DOD Awards $15.3M Construction Contract for Site 3B and 5 AOC to Mascaro Construction CO LP
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,287,556 ($15.3M)
Contractor: Mascaro Construction CO LP
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-30
End Date: 2012-05-31
Contract Duration: 2,070 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: SITE 3B AND 5 AOC
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20510
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.3 million to MASCARO CONSTRUCTION CO LP for work described as: SITE 3B AND 5 AOC Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. The duration of the contract is substantial at 2070 days, indicating a long-term project. 4. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DOD. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. 6. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar vehicle.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without knowing the exact scope of work for SITE 3B AND 5 AOC. However, the total award amount of $15.3 million for a construction project of this duration (over 5 years) appears within a reasonable range for large-scale institutional building construction. Further analysis would require comparing the cost per square foot or per unit of work against similar projects in the same geographic region and of comparable complexity.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally promotes a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and value for the government. The open nature of the competition suggests that the agency sought the best possible offer from the market.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically drives down prices through market forces, ensuring that the government is not overpaying for services or goods.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the personnel who will utilize the facilities at SITE 3B AND 5 AOC. The contract delivers construction services for institutional buildings, likely involving new construction or significant renovation. The geographic impact is localized to the District of Columbia, where the contract was performed. The project will likely involve a significant construction workforce, including skilled trades and laborers, contributing to local employment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (2070 days) could introduce risks related to material cost fluctuations and evolving construction standards.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts can lead to disputes if unforeseen issues arise that significantly impact costs.
- Reliance on a single delivery order under a potential IDIQ could indicate a concentrated scope of work, requiring careful monitoring.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contractor, MASCARO CONSTRUCTION CO LP, has experience in large-scale construction projects.
Sector Analysis
The construction sector is a significant part of the federal spending landscape, encompassing a wide range of projects from infrastructure to facility maintenance. This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a segment that includes the building of non-residential structures like government facilities. Federal spending in this area is often driven by modernization needs, new installations, or upgrades to existing infrastructure, with significant annual outlays across various agencies.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a specific set-aside requirement. However, the prime contractor, MASCARO CONSTRUCTION CO LP, may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their overall business strategy, which could indirectly benefit the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the project within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project-specific oversight reports are not always publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Construction Contracts
- Army Corps of Engineers Projects
- Federal Building Construction
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction Contracts
- Firm Fixed Price Construction Awards
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase exposure to market volatility.
- Potential for scope creep or unforeseen site conditions in large construction projects.
- Reliance on a single delivery order could indicate a concentrated risk if part of a larger IDIQ.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, district-of-columbia, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, large-contract, long-duration
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.3 million to MASCARO CONSTRUCTION CO LP. SITE 3B AND 5 AOC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MASCARO CONSTRUCTION CO LP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2012-05-31.
What is the specific nature of the work performed under SITE 3B AND 5 AOC?
The contract identifier 'SITE 3B AND 5 AOC' suggests a specific location or set of facilities requiring construction or renovation. Without access to the detailed contract statement of work (SOW), the precise nature of the construction remains unspecified. However, given the NAICS code 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction), it likely involves the erection, alteration, or repair of non-residential buildings. This could range from new administrative buildings, barracks, training facilities, or maintenance structures within a Department of Defense installation. The 'AOC' might refer to 'Area of Construction' or a specific facility designation. Further details would be found in the contract's SOW and any associated technical specifications.
How does the $15.3 million award compare to similar construction projects by the Department of Defense?
Comparing the $15.3 million award requires context regarding the scope, complexity, and location of the project. The Department of Defense undertakes a vast array of construction projects, from small renovations to multi-billion dollar infrastructure developments. For a project spanning over five years (2070 days), $15.3 million is a moderate-sized award. Larger projects might involve new base construction or major facility upgrades, while smaller ones could be specific building renovations. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare metrics like cost per square foot, cost per specific unit of work (e.g., per housing unit, per laboratory space), and project complexity against other similar institutional building projects awarded by the DOD or other federal agencies in the same fiscal period and geographic region.
What are the primary risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract of this duration?
The primary risk with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, especially one lasting over five years (2070 days), is the potential for cost overruns if unforeseen circumstances arise that are not adequately addressed in the contract's contingency planning or force majeure clauses. Material price escalation over such a long period can significantly impact the contractor's profitability if not properly managed or hedged. Changes in regulatory requirements, environmental standards, or unforeseen site conditions (e.g., hazardous materials, unexpected subsurface issues) can also lead to costly change orders or disputes. The government's risk is primarily related to potentially paying a premium if the contractor accurately anticipates these risks and prices them into the initial FFP, or if disputes arise that delay the project and incur additional management costs.
What does the 'Delivery Order' award type signify in this context?
The 'Delivery Order' award type typically indicates that this contract is a task order issued under a larger, pre-existing indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar multiple-award contract vehicle. This means that the Department of the Army likely established a contract with one or more vendors for a broad category of construction services, and this specific delivery order represents a defined scope of work, a specific quantity of goods, or a particular project with a set price and delivery schedule. The advantage of this structure is that it allows for streamlined procurement of services as needed, without requiring a full, new competitive solicitation for each individual project. It implies that MASCARO CONSTRUCTION CO LP was likely one of several awardees on a broader IDIQ contract.
How has federal spending in commercial and institutional building construction evolved, and where does this contract fit?
Federal spending in commercial and institutional building construction fluctuates based on government priorities, infrastructure needs, and economic conditions. Historically, significant investments are made during periods of military expansion, agency consolidation, or when addressing deferred maintenance backlogs. The NAICS code 236220 covers a broad spectrum of non-residential construction. This $15.3 million contract for SITE 3B AND 5 AOC represents a specific project within this larger category. Its significance lies in its contribution to the Department of Defense's facility management and development goals. Benchmarking this against overall federal construction spending would require analyzing aggregate data for this NAICS code across all agencies, which typically runs into billions of dollars annually, reflecting the government's continuous need for physical infrastructure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: FURNACE/STEAM/DRYING; NUCL REACTOR
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 1720 METROPOLITAN ST, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15233
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,287,556
Exercised Options: $15,287,556
Current Obligation: $15,287,556
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DACA3103D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-30
Current End Date: 2012-05-31
Potential End Date: 2012-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-03-28
More Contracts from Mascaro Construction CO LP
- Construction Manager AS Constructor (CMC) for the U.S. Courthouse in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania — $169.9M (General Services Administration)
- Constructability Review of Construction Documents for Buffalo Courthouse — $113.1M (General Services Administration)
- TAS::47 4543::TAS. Construction Manager AS Constructor Services, Huntington Federal Building, Huntigton, WV — $42.2M (General Services Administration)
- 200605!604871!2100!w912dr!usa Engineer Dist Baltimore !w912dr06c0001 !A!N! !N! ! !20060222!20080901!088165972!088165972!088165972!n!mascaro Construction Company, !1720 Metropolitan ST !pittsburgh !pa!15233!30325!021!24!frederick !frederick !maryland !+000026448000!n!n!000026448000!y199!other Miscellaneous Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !NOT Discernable !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!2!004!b! !D!W!A! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !z!z!a!a!000!a!c!y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $26.8M (Department of Defense)
- Power Enhancement-Cjis — $23.4M (Department of Justice)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)