Roy Anderson Corp awarded $18.3M for USAFCENT HQ construction, a significant project in commercial building

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,339,053 ($18.3M)

Contractor: ROY Anderson Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-21

End Date: 2013-05-17

Contract Duration: 969 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: P03002 ADD/ALTER USAFCENT HQ

Place of Performance

Location: SHAW AFB, SUMTER County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29152

State: South Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.3 million to ROY ANDERSON CORP for work described as: P03002 ADD/ALTER USAFCENT HQ Key points: 1. The contract value represents a substantial investment in infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics for this project are assessed to understand pricing efficiency. 3. Risk indicators are evaluated based on project duration and contractor history. 4. Performance context is provided by comparing to similar construction projects. 5. The contract positions the awardee within the large-scale commercial construction sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $18.3 million for the USAFCENT HQ construction appears reasonable given the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar large-scale institutional building projects suggests that the pricing is within expected ranges. The firm fixed-price contract type generally provides cost certainty, although potential for change orders exists. The awardee's experience in similar projects will be a key factor in assessing overall value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of four bidders (no=4) suggests a healthy level of competition for this significant construction project. This competitive environment is expected to drive more favorable pricing and terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging the best value proposals.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the United States Air Force Central Command (USAFCENT) personnel who will utilize the new headquarters. The project delivers essential construction services for a critical military facility. The geographic impact is concentrated in South Carolina, where the construction will take place. Workforce implications include job creation for construction workers and related trades in the local area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise during construction.
Delays in project completion could impact operational readiness of USAFCENT.
Ensuring compliance with all environmental and safety regulations throughout the build.

Positive Signals

Award to an experienced contractor with a track record in large-scale construction.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget predictability.
Full and open competition likely resulted in competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. The market for large-scale government and military facility construction is characterized by substantial project values and stringent requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar military headquarters or large institutional buildings would typically range in the tens of millions of dollars, aligning with this contract's value.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary awardee is a large business, and the impact on the small business ecosystem will be indirect, potentially through opportunities for lower-tier subcontractors if they are engaged by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and their representatives within the Department of the Navy, overseeing the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of the specified construction. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project progress reports may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Projects
Department of Defense Facilities Management
General Building Construction

Risk Flags

Potential for schedule delays
Risk of cost escalation due to market volatility
Complexity of large-scale construction projects

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.3 million to ROY ANDERSON CORP. P03002 ADD/ALTER USAFCENT HQ

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROY ANDERSON CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-21. End: 2013-05-17.

What is the contractor's track record with similar large-scale government construction projects?

Roy Anderson Corp has a history of undertaking significant construction projects, including those for government and institutional clients. While specific details on past projects of identical scope and scale to the USAFCENT HQ are not provided here, their experience in commercial and institutional building construction suggests a capacity to handle complex projects. Further investigation into their past performance on Department of Defense contracts or similar large-scale builds would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and potential risks associated with this award.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or budget for this project?

The provided data indicates an award amount of $18,339,053.30. Without access to the original contract solicitation, estimated cost, or budget allocated for the USAFCENT HQ construction, a direct comparison is not possible. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition with four bidders suggests that the final negotiated price was deemed acceptable by the government. If the award was significantly below or above initial estimates, it would warrant further scrutiny.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract?

Key risk indicators for this contract include the project's duration (969 days, approximately 2.6 years), which increases the potential for unforeseen issues like material cost fluctuations, labor availability challenges, or changes in regulatory requirements. The complexity of constructing a headquarters facility also presents inherent risks related to design integration, site conditions, and coordination of various trades. The contractor's past performance on similar projects, while not detailed here, is a critical factor in assessing execution risk.

How effective has Roy Anderson Corp been in delivering projects on time and within budget in the past?

Assessing the effectiveness of Roy Anderson Corp in delivering projects on time and within budget requires access to their historical performance data, including project completion dates, final costs, and any documented delays or cost overruns. This information is typically found in contractor performance evaluation reports (e.g., CPARS in the US federal system). Without this specific data, it is difficult to definitively state their effectiveness. However, their continued ability to win competitive bids for substantial projects suggests a generally satisfactory performance record.

What is the historical spending pattern for USAFCENT HQ construction or similar facilities?

Historical spending on USAFCENT HQ construction or similar facilities would typically be found by analyzing past Department of Defense construction budgets and contract awards for military installations. Projects of this nature are often multi-year endeavors funded through specific military construction appropriations. Analyzing trends in construction costs, inflation, and the scale of previous headquarters builds would provide context for the $18.3 million award. This specific contract represents a single, significant investment rather than a recurring operational expense.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N6945009R1258

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tutor Perini Corporation (UEI: 006954432)

Address: 11400 REICHOLD RD, GULFPORT, MS, 39503

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,339,053

Exercised Options: $18,339,053

Current Obligation: $18,339,053

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6945009D1280

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline