DoD's $39.2M Newport Fitness Facility Construction Awarded to Consigli Construction Co., Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,240,099 ($39.2M)

Contractor: Consigli Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-08-10

End Date: 2014-05-02

Contract Duration: 1,726 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: FUND ACRN AA; P-347 CONSTRUCT FITNESS FACILITY, NEWPORT, RI

Place of Performance

Location: NEWPORT, NEWPORT County, RHODE ISLAND, 02840

State: Rhode Island Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $39.2 million to CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: FUND ACRN AA; P-347 CONSTRUCT FITNESS FACILITY, NEWPORT, RI Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in military infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this project. 3. Project duration of 1726 days indicates a substantial construction timeline. 4. The firm fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 5. Geographic focus on Rhode Island highlights regional infrastructure development. 6. The award falls within the broad category of commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $39.2 million for a fitness facility appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would be necessary to definitively assess value for money. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to cap costs, but the final cost relative to the initial bid and the scope of work is key to evaluating overall value. Without specific cost breakdowns or comparisons to similar facilities, a precise value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this construction project. A competitive environment generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to vie for the contract, driving down prices and improving the quality of proposals received.

Public Impact

Service members at the Newport facility will benefit from improved fitness amenities. The project delivers essential infrastructure upgrades for the Department of the Navy. The construction work is geographically concentrated in Rhode Island. The project likely created numerous construction jobs in the local Rhode Island workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns given the project's duration and fixed-price nature.
Scope creep could be a risk if not managed tightly throughout the extended construction period.
Quality control during a long construction project requires consistent oversight.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Award to a single contractor streamlines project management and execution.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The Department of Defense is a major client for construction services, with significant annual spending on facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large-scale military base construction or renovation projects, particularly those involving recreational or support facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business. Further investigation would be needed to determine if Consigli Construction Co., Inc. has a history of subcontracting with small businesses on projects of this scale.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) and the relevant Navy facilities engineering command. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, which penalizes the contractor for exceeding agreed-upon costs. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Projects
Department of Defense Infrastructure
Fitness and Recreation Facilities

Risk Flags

Long project duration may increase risk of unforeseen issues.
Firm Fixed Price contracts can sometimes lead to contractor disputes if scope is not perfectly defined.
Construction projects inherently carry risks related to site conditions, materials, and labor.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $39.2 million to CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. FUND ACRN AA; P-347 CONSTRUCT FITNESS FACILITY, NEWPORT, RI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-08-10. End: 2014-05-02.

What was the initial estimated cost versus the final awarded cost for this fitness facility project?

The provided data shows a final award amount of $39,240,098.78. However, it does not include the initial estimated cost or any breakdown of how the final cost was reached. To assess the value and efficiency of this contract, a comparison between the initial estimate, the bids received, and the final expenditure is crucial. Without this information, it's difficult to determine if the project was completed within budget or if there were significant cost escalations.

How does the per-square-foot construction cost of this facility compare to similar projects in Rhode Island or other Navy installations?

The provided data does not include the square footage of the fitness facility, making a per-square-foot cost comparison impossible. To benchmark the value effectively, one would need to obtain the facility's dimensions and then compare its cost per square foot against similar military or commercial fitness centers built around the same time period, both regionally and nationally. This would help determine if the $39.2 million expenditure was cost-effective for the size and type of facility delivered.

What is Consigli Construction Co., Inc.'s track record with Department of Defense contracts, particularly in construction?

Consigli Construction Co., Inc. has a history of working with the Department of Defense, as evidenced by this award. A deeper dive into their contract history with the DoD would reveal the number and value of previous contracts, their performance ratings, and any instances of disputes or contract modifications. Understanding their past performance on similar projects, especially large-scale construction for military branches, provides insight into their reliability and capability for executing complex government projects.

Were there any significant delays or cost overruns during the 1726-day performance period of this contract?

The provided data indicates a performance period of 1726 days (approximately 4.7 years), which is a substantial duration for a construction project. While the data confirms the award amount and dates, it does not detail project execution specifics like delays or cost overruns. Information regarding project milestones, change orders, or claims filed by the contractor would be necessary to assess if the project stayed on schedule and within budget relative to the firm fixed-price agreement.

How did the winning bid from Consigli Construction Co., Inc. compare to the other four bids received?

The data confirms that there were 5 bidders for this contract, indicating a competitive process. However, it does not provide the specific bid amounts submitted by each competitor. Knowing how Consigli's winning bid compared to the others (e.g., lowest bid, second lowest, or if price was one of several factors) is essential for understanding the effectiveness of the competition and whether the government secured the best possible price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N4008508R2108

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Consigli Building Group Inc (UEI: 963443499)

Address: 72 SUMNER ST, MILFORD, MA, 01757

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,240,099

Exercised Options: $39,240,099

Current Obligation: $39,240,099

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N4008508D2112

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline