Fort Meade Barracks Replacement Contract Awarded to Consigli Construction for $85.9M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $85,866,319 ($85.9M)

Contractor: Consigli Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-05-31

End Date: 2025-10-29

Contract Duration: 882 days

Daily Burn Rate: $97.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: UNACCOMPANIED ENLISTED PERSONNEL HOUSING (UEPH) BARRACKS REPLACEMENT, FORT. MEADE, MARYLAND

Place of Performance

Location: MILFORD, WORCESTER County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01757

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $85.9 million to CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: UNACCOMPANIED ENLISTED PERSONNEL HOUSING (UEPH) BARRACKS REPLACEMENT, FORT. MEADE, MARYLAND Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in military infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The project duration of 882 days indicates a substantial construction timeline. 5. The award is for a critical need: replacing unaccompanied enlisted personnel housing. 6. The contractor, Consigli Construction Co., Inc., has a track record in large-scale projects.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $85.9 million for barracks replacement at Fort Meade appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scale and complexity. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more precise assessment, but the firm-fixed-price structure suggests the government has negotiated a defined cost. The contractor's experience in similar large-scale construction projects also supports the valuation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With five bids received, the competition level appears adequate, suggesting that the Army sought multiple proposals to ensure a competitive price. This process is designed to foster price discovery and potentially lead to a more favorable outcome for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this barracks replacement project likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are unaccompanied enlisted personnel at Fort Meade, who will receive updated and improved housing. The project will deliver new barracks facilities, enhancing the quality of life and living conditions for service members. The geographic impact is localized to Fort Meade, Maryland, improving the base's infrastructure. The construction activities will likely create temporary jobs in the local and regional workforce during the project's duration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite the firm-fixed-price contract.
Delays in construction could impact the availability of adequate housing for service members.
Ensuring the quality of construction meets military standards is crucial for long-term durability.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract mitigates budget uncertainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
The project addresses a critical need for improved military housing.
The contractor has experience in large-scale construction, indicating capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. The market for military construction is substantial, with significant government investment annually in upgrading and maintaining defense facilities. This project aligns with the Department of Defense's ongoing efforts to modernize its infrastructure and improve living conditions for service members. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale barracks or dormitory construction projects awarded by federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if Consigli Construction Co., Inc. has a subcontracting plan that includes opportunities for small businesses, which is a common requirement in federal contracts of this magnitude.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this project will likely be managed by the Department of the Army, potentially through contracting officers and project managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the project within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is typically facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting, though specific oversight reports or inspector general involvement would depend on project milestones and any identified issues.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction, Army
Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing
Department of Defense Facilities Modernization
Federal Building Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost escalation due to unforeseen site conditions.
Risk of construction delays impacting project timeline.
Ensuring adherence to stringent military construction quality standards.
Dependency on contractor's financial stability and performance history.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $85.9 million to CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. UNACCOMPANIED ENLISTED PERSONNEL HOUSING (UEPH) BARRACKS REPLACEMENT, FORT. MEADE, MARYLAND

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $85.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-05-31. End: 2025-10-29.

What is Consigli Construction Co., Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense and similar large-scale construction projects?

Consigli Construction Co., Inc. has a significant history of undertaking large-scale construction projects, including those for government and institutional clients. While specific details on their past performance exclusively with the Department of Defense for barracks construction require deeper database dives, their portfolio often includes complex projects such as educational facilities, healthcare centers, and public infrastructure. Their experience in managing large budgets, complex schedules, and stringent quality requirements is a key indicator of their capability for this Fort Meade project. Reviewing past performance evaluations and any contract disputes or awards from federal agencies would provide a more granular understanding of their reliability and expertise in delivering similar military construction projects.

How does the awarded price of $85.9 million compare to similar barracks replacement projects at other military installations?

Benchmarking the $85.9 million award for the Fort Meade barracks replacement against similar projects requires access to a comprehensive database of federal construction contracts. Factors such as project size (square footage, number of beds), location (labor costs, material availability), specific construction complexities (e.g., site conditions, historical preservation), and the year of award significantly influence pricing. Generally, large-scale barracks projects can range from tens of millions to over a hundred million dollars. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract suggests a defined cost ceiling. A detailed comparison would involve identifying projects with comparable scope, scale, and timeline awarded within the last few years to assess if this contract represents good value for money, considering market conditions and specific project requirements.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for barracks construction?

While firm-fixed-price contracts are generally favorable for the government by capping costs, risks remain. For this barracks replacement project, key risk indicators include potential contractor underestimation of costs, leading to quality compromises or requests for change orders. Unforeseen site conditions (e.g., environmental issues, subsurface obstructions) at Fort Meade could necessitate costly modifications, even under a fixed-price agreement. Schedule delays, whether due to weather, labor shortages, or supply chain disruptions, pose another risk, potentially impacting the military's operational readiness. Ensuring robust oversight and clear contract specifications are crucial to mitigating these risks and ensuring the project's successful completion within budget and on time.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' process likely to be in ensuring program effectiveness for this housing project?

The 'full and open competition' process is designed to maximize the pool of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of selecting a contractor capable of delivering a high-quality project at a competitive price. For this barracks replacement, this means the Army likely received proposals from multiple qualified construction firms. The effectiveness in ensuring program success hinges on the clarity of the solicitation requirements, the evaluation criteria used, and the thoroughness of the pre-award due diligence. If the competition process effectively identified a contractor with the right technical expertise, financial stability, and a realistic understanding of the project scope, it significantly enhances the probability of the project meeting its objectives: providing safe, modern, and functional housing for unaccompanied enlisted personnel within the specified timeframe and budget.

What are the historical spending patterns for unaccompanied enlisted personnel housing (UEPH) replacement projects within the Department of the Army?

Historical spending patterns for UEPH replacement projects within the Department of the Army reveal a consistent and substantial investment in military housing infrastructure. These projects are often multi-year endeavors, with individual contract values varying significantly based on the size and scope of the barracks being replaced, as well as geographic location and construction costs. Over the past decade, the Army has allocated billions of dollars towards modernizing its barracks, driven by the need to improve living conditions and meet evolving standards. Spending often fluctuates based on congressional appropriations, military readiness priorities, and the backlog of aging facilities requiring replacement. Analyzing past budgets and contract awards for similar UEPH projects provides context for the current $85.9 million award, indicating whether it aligns with historical investment levels or represents a significant deviation.

What are the implications of the 'MASSACHUSETTS' state code (ST: MA) for this contract awarded to Consigli Construction Co., Inc.?

The state code 'MA' indicates that Consigli Construction Co., Inc. is registered or primarily based in Massachusetts. While the contract is for a project at Fort Meade, Maryland, the contractor's home state can have several implications. It may influence logistical considerations, such as the mobilization of workforce and equipment to Maryland. It could also suggest that the company has strong ties to the New England construction market, potentially leveraging established supply chains or labor pools from that region. Furthermore, state-based registration is a standard requirement for federal contractors. The specific location of the contractor does not inherently alter the contract's terms or the project's requirements but provides context regarding the company's operational base and potential regional economic impact.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912DR23R0008

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 72 SUMNER ST, MILFORD, MA, 01757

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $85,866,319

Exercised Options: $85,866,319

Current Obligation: $85,866,319

Actual Outlays: $15,498,976

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline