DoD's $32.8M IT contract with A & T Systems faces scrutiny over competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,860,438 ($32.9M)

Contractor: A & T Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-11-09

End Date: 2022-06-08

Contract Duration: 2,037 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CARLISLE BARRACKS IMCS III INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SYSTEMS SPT

Place of Performance

Location: CARLISLE, CUMBERLAND County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17013

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $32.9 million to A & T SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CARLISLE BARRACKS IMCS III INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SYSTEMS SPT Key points: 1. The contract value of $32.8M for IT systems support is significant. 2. Competition was limited, raising questions about price discovery. 3. Potential risks include overpayment and lack of market-driven pricing. 4. The IT sector is prone to rapid technological change, impacting long-term value.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt at cost control. However, without robust competition, it's difficult to benchmark against similar IT support contracts to definitively assess value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a restricted bidding process. This limited competition likely hindered effective price discovery and may have resulted in a higher price than a fully open competition would yield.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition raises concerns about taxpayer dollars being spent efficiently, as the government may not have secured the best possible price.

Public Impact

Military base IT infrastructure relies on this contract for operational continuity. Service members and civilian personnel depend on reliable IT systems. The duration of the contract (2037) suggests a long-term commitment to this vendor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically wired telecommunications carriers, supporting essential functions at Carlisle Barracks. Spending benchmarks in this area vary widely based on the scope of services, but significant investments are common for maintaining secure and operational IT infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'sb' field is false. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract type and award method warrant further oversight to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery. Regular performance reviews and market research would be beneficial.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

wired-telecommunications-carriers, department-of-defense, pa, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $32.9 million to A & T SYSTEMS, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF CARLISLE BARRACKS IMCS III INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SYSTEMS SPT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is A & T SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-11-09. End: 2022-06-08.

What specific IT systems are covered under this contract, and how does their criticality justify the limited competition award?

The contract covers IT systems support at Carlisle Barracks. While the specific systems aren't detailed, the 'na' code 517110 suggests wired telecommunications infrastructure. Criticality is implied by the need for continuous support, but the justification for excluding other sources needs clearer documentation to ensure the government wasn't deprived of potentially better offers or pricing.

How was the price determined to be fair and reasonable given the limited competition and exclusion of sources?

The determination of fair and reasonable pricing under limited competition often relies on historical pricing, data from similar contracts (if available), or certified cost and pricing data from the contractor. Without transparency into this process, it's difficult to assess if the government truly received competitive pricing or if the exclusion of sources led to an inflated cost.

What is the projected cost savings or benefit achieved by using A & T Systems compared to a fully open and competitive procurement?

It is not possible to determine projected cost savings or benefits without a comparative analysis against a fully open procurement. The current award structure, with limited competition, inherently suggests a potential trade-off between speed/simplicity and cost-effectiveness. A post-award analysis or a hypothetical 'what-if' scenario could attempt to quantify this, but it remains speculative.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationWired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite)Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W91RUS13R0004

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12200 TECH RD STE 200, SILVER SPRING, MD, 20904

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $35,336,775

Exercised Options: $35,225,530

Current Obligation: $32,860,438

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91RUS15D0004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-11-09

Current End Date: 2022-06-08

Potential End Date: 2022-06-08 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-01-03

More Contracts from A & T Systems, Inc.

View all A & T Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending