THE Boeing Company Contracts in Alabama

Overview

Total Contract Value: $48,658,723,715

Contract Count: 31

Average Contract Size: $1.6B

Sole Source Rate: 0%

Small Business Rate: 0%

Awarding Agencies

1. Department of Defense — $34.2B (26 contracts)
2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration — $14.3B (4 contracts)
3. Department of Homeland Security — $199.2M (1 contracts)

Spending by Sector

• Defense: $24.3B (14 contracts)
• R&D: $13.7B (15 contracts)
• Other: $10.7B (2 contracts)

Contracts

• 200112!000108!9700!ZD60 !BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORG. !HQ000601C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20001222!20080930!848025649!848025649!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !3370 E MIRALOMA AVE !ANAHEIM !CA!92806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000383571022!N!N!000000000000!AD93!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-ADV TECH DEV !S1 !SERVICES !1CAA!BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYS !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !U!R!2!001!B! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $18.8B
• PROVIDE DEVELOPMENTAL HARDWARE AND TEST ARTICLES, AND MANUFACTURE AND ASSEMBLE ARES I UPPER STAGES. THE UPPER STAGE (US) ELEMENT IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PROVIDES THE SECOND STAGE OF FLIGHT. THE US ELEMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROLL CONTROL DURING THE FIRST STAGE BURN AND SEPARATION; AND WILL PROVIDE THE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION, COMMAND AND DATA HANDLING, AND OTHER AVIONICS FUNCTIONS FOR THE ARES I DURING ALL PHASES OF THE ASCENT FLIGHT. THE US ELEMENT IS A NEW DESIGN THAT EMPHASIZES SAFETY, OPERABILITY, AND MINIMUM LIFE CYCLE COST. THE OVERALL DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION (DDT&E), PRODUCTION, AND SUSTAINING ENGINEERING EFFORTS INCLUDE ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY THREE ORGANIZATIONS; THE NASA DESIGN TEAM (NDT), THE UPPER STAGE PRODUCTION CONTRACTOR (USPC) AND THE INSTRUMENT UNIT PRODUCTION CONTRACTOR (IUPC). FOR CLARITY, THE USPC WILL BE REFERRED TO AS THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THIS DOCUMENT. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE PRIMARY ELEMENTS OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE INCLUDING: THE FIRST STAGE, US INCLUDING INSTRUMENT UNIT (IU), AND US ENGINE; AND WILL ALSO INTEGRATE THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AT THE LAUNCH SITE. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DDT&E, INCLUDING TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC INTEGRATION OF THE US SUBSYSTEMS AND GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY. NASA WILL LEAD THE EFFORT TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE US ELEMENT, THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS, AND ALL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION, INITIAL MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY PROCESS PLANNING, LOGISTICS PLANNING, AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT, QUALIFICATION, AND ACCEPTANCE TESTING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY NASA AND THE CONTRACTOR TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS AND FOR RISK MITIGATION. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OVERALL UPPER STAGE VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PROCESS AND WILL REQUIRE SUPPORT FROM THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND ASSEMBLY OF THE UPPER STAGE TEST FLIGHT AND OPERATIONAL UPPER STAGE UNITS INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION OF UPPER STAGE INSTRUMENT UNIT, THE GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED US ENGINE, BOOSTER SEPARATION MOTORS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY. A DESCRIPTION OF THE NASA MANAGED AND PERFORMED EFFORTS IS CONTAINED IN THE US WORK PACKAGES AND WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE NDT, IUPC, AND CONTRACTOR DURING THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATION OF THE US ELEMENT. THE US CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DESCRIBED IN THE USO-CLV-SE-25704 US DESIGN DEFINITION DOCUMENT (DDD) IS THE BASELINE DESIGN FOR THIS CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTORS EARLY ROLE WILL BE TO PROVIDE PRODUCIBILITY ENGINEERING SUPPORT TO NASA VIA THE ESTABLISHED US OFFICE STRUCTURE AND TO PROVIDE INPUTS INTO THE FINAL DESIGN CONFIGURATION, SPECIFICATIONS, AND STANDARDS. NASA WILL TRANSITION THE MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY, LOGISTICS SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, AND THE SUSTAINING ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS TO THE CONTRACTOR AT THE KEY POINTS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM CURRENTLY PLANNED TO OCCUR NO LATER THAN 90 DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE FOLLOWING MAJOR MILESTONES: MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY US PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW (PDR) LOGISTICS SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE US PDR CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT US CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW CDR) SUSTAINING ENGINEERING US DESIGN CERTIFICATION REVIEW (DCR) AFTER THE COMPLETION OF AN ORDERLY TRANSITION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE CONTRACTOR, NASA WILL ASSUME AN INSIGHT ROLE INTO THE CONTRACTORS PRODUCTION, SUSTAINING ENGINEERING, AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT OF THE ARES I US TEST PROGRAM AND FLIGHT HARDWARE. AFTER DCR, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUSTAINING ENGINEERING PER SOW SECTION 4.7, AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AND SUPPORT THE US CONFIGURATION AND FOR PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT. — $10.5B
• THE MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY (MDA), GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE (GMD) DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINMENT CONTRACT (DSC) THE GMD DSC WORK INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: 1) FUTURE DEVELOPMENT; 2) FIELDING; 3) TEST; 4) SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INTEGRATION AND CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT; 5) EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING AND REFURBISHMENT; 6) TRAINING; AND 7) OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR THE GMD WEAPON SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT FACILITIES. — $6.5B
• GBI/AUR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS ENG — $4.4B
• SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS) STAGES PRODUCTION AND EVOLUTION CONTRACT (SPEC) — $2.4B
• LETTER CONTRACT TO BOEING — $1.3B
• INTERIM CRYOGENIC PROPULSION STAGE FOR SLS — $1.3B
• MAINTENANCE SUPPORT - CY09 — $730.3M
• SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES — $346.7M
• ELEMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING — $315.7M
• AWARD FOLLOW-ON APACHE D UNIQUE PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS (PBL) — $304.8M
• IGF::OT::IGF GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETTERENT TECHNOLOGY MATURATION AND RISK REDUCTION — $261.1M
• ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING PHASE FOR THE ENHANCED MEDIUM ALTITUDE RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (EMARSS), RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO PRODUCE FOUR EMD EMARSS UNITS WITH OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL EMD UNITS AND LRIP UNITS AND ICLS SUPPORT. — $218.8M
• SYSTEMS TASK ORDER (STO) UNDER SECURE BORDER INITIATIVE, PROVIDING SYSTEM-LEVEL ENGINEERING AND PROGRAM EXECUTION SERVICES — $199.2M
• ARES I UPPER STAGE INSTRUMENT UNIT AVIONICS DEVELOPMENT. THE UPPER STAGE (US) ELEMENT IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PROVIDES THE SECOND STAGE OF FLIGHT. THE US ES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROLL CONTROL DURING THE FIRST STAGE BURN AND SEPARATION AND WILL PROVIDE THE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION, COMMAND AND DATA HANDLING, AND OTHER AVIONICS FUNCTIONS FOR THE ARES I DURING ALL PHASES OF THE ASCENT FLIGHT. THE US IS A NEW DESIGN THAT EMPHASIZES SAFETY, OPERABILITY, AND MINIMUM LIFE-CYCLE COST. THE OVERALL DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION (DDT&E), PRODUCTION, AND SUSTAINING ENGINEERING EFFORTS INCLUDE ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY THREE ORGANIZATIONS: THE NASA DESIGN TEAM (NDT), THE UPPER STAGE PRODUCTION CONTRACTOR (USPC) AND THE INSTRUMENT UNIT AVIONICS CONTRACTOR (IUAC). THE USPC WAS SELECTED VIA A SEPARATE ACQUISITION. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE PRIMARY ELEMENTS OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE INCLUDING: THE FIRST STAGE, US INCLUDING INSTRUMENT UNIT (IU), US ENGINE, AND ORION AND WILL ALSO INTEGRATE THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AT THE LAUNCH SITE. THE US AVIONICS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE DEVELOPED BY THE NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER (MSFC) LED TEAM, IN CONJUNCTION WITH GLENN RESEARCH CENTER (GRC), AMES RESEARCH CENTER (ARC), AND KENNEDY SPACE CENTER (KSC). THE NDT IS COMPOSED OF BOTH GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVANTS AND SUPPORT CONTRACTORS FROM EACH OF THE AFOREMENTIONED CENTERS. THE NDTS AVIONICS AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH IS DOCUMENTED IN USO-CLV-DE-25106, UPPER STAGE AVIONICS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE INSTRUMENT UNIT (IU) WILL HOUSE THE MAJORITY OF THE ARES I US AVIONICS. A SMALLER SET OF ELECTRONICS AND CABLE HARNESSES WILL BE LOCATED ON THE US CORE STRUCTURE AND INTERSTAGE STRUCTURE. THE US CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DESCRIBED IN THE USO-CLV-SE-25704 US DESIGN DEFINITION DOCUMENT (DDD) IS THE BASELINE VEHICLE DESIGN. THE ARES I US AVIONICS AND SOFTWARE SUBSYSTEM SPECIFICATION (USO-CLV-DE-25107), THE ELECTRICAL GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (EGSE) SUBSYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION (USO-CLV-DE-25135), AND THE ARES I US AVIONICS AND SOFTWARE COMPONENT END ITEM (CEI) SPECIFICATIONS (USO-CLV-DE-25107), LISTED IN SECTION 5, WILL SERVE AS THE SOURCE FOR TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTRACTOR. THIS IS A COST PLUS AWARD FEE (CPAF) TYPE OF CONTRACT AND FEE FOR CLINS 1 AND 2 IS EARNED BASED ON THE AWARD FEE SCORE GIVEN AT THE END OF EACH AWARD FEE PERIOD. FEE FOR CLINS 1 AND 2 ARE EVALUATED UNDER NASA FAR SUPPLEMENT (NFS) CLAUSE 1852.216-76, AWARD FEE FOR SERVICE CONTRACTS. THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE AWARD FEE SHOWN IN TABLE 3 OF PARAGRAPH 1.4, BELOW, IS SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT BASED ON IDIQ WORK AUTHORIZED UNDER CLIN 2. ADDITIONALLY, THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE AWARD FEE IN EACH PERIOD IS SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENTS ARISING FROM CHANGES OR OTHER CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS. — $196.3M
• GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE READINESS — $176.3M
• IGF::OT::IGF CORE MET-I TECHNICAL SE&I REQUIREMENTS — $145.7M
• IGF::OT::IGF THE TASKING OF MET-I CORE [MDA/DE] SYSTEMS ENGINEERING&INTEGRATION (SE&I) REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE BMDS. — $104.2M
• SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES — $98.4M
• IGF::CT::IGF BASELINE ENGINEERING — $89.9M

Frequently Asked Questions

How many contracts does THE Boeing Company have in Alabama?

THE Boeing Company has 31 contracts performed in Alabama worth a combined $48.7B.

What is the average contract size for THE Boeing Company in Alabama?

The average contract size is $1.6B.

Explore More