DoD awards $21.5M for T-44 maintenance, SIKORSKY SUPPORT SERVICES INC wins contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,511,775 ($21.5M)

Contractor: Sikorsky Support Services Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-11-22

End Date: 2014-10-31

Contract Duration: 343 days

Daily Burn Rate: $62.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: T-44 MAINTENANCE/REPAIR

Place of Performance

Location: STRATFORD, FAIRFIELD County, CONNECTICUT, 06615, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Connecticut Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.5 million to SIKORSKY SUPPORT SERVICES INC for work described as: T-44 MAINTENANCE/REPAIR Key points: 1. Contract value of $21.5M for T-44 maintenance and repair. 2. Awarded to SIKORSKY SUPPORT SERVICES INC. 3. Full and open competition was utilized. 4. The contract falls under 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' (NAICS 488190).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded on a cost-no-fee basis, which can make price assessment challenging. The obligated amount was $21.5M, with a reported base of $6.2M.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential aircraft maintenance, ensuring operational readiness of T-44 aircraft.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operational readiness of T-44 aircraft. Supports aviation maintenance sector jobs. Funds allocated for critical defense infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense support services sector. Spending benchmarks for similar maintenance and repair contracts can vary significantly based on aircraft type and service scope.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, indicating standard oversight procedures are in place for this award.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-support-activities-for-air-transpo, department-of-defense, ct, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.5 million to SIKORSKY SUPPORT SERVICES INC. T-44 MAINTENANCE/REPAIR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIKORSKY SUPPORT SERVICES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-11-22. End: 2014-10-31.

What is the typical cost range for T-44 aircraft maintenance and repair services?

Determining a precise typical cost range for T-44 maintenance is complex without specific details on the scope of work, required parts, and labor hours. However, contracts for similar military aircraft maintenance can range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars annually, depending on the fleet size, age, and operational tempo. Benchmarking against historical data for the T-44 or comparable aircraft within the DoD would be necessary for a more accurate assessment.

What are the potential risks associated with a cost-no-fee contract for aircraft maintenance?

A cost-no-fee (CNF) contract, while potentially beneficial for urgent needs, carries risks. The government pays the contractor's allowable costs but does not pay a fee. This can lead to a lack of contractor incentive to control costs, as they are reimbursed regardless of efficiency. It also makes it harder for the government to assess the fairness of the price post-award, potentially leading to overpayment if not rigorously monitored.

How effectively does full and open competition ensure value for taxpayer money in this context?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best prices and technical solutions. In this case, it suggests that several companies were eligible and competed for the T-44 maintenance contract. This process should theoretically lead to a more competitive price than a sole-source or limited competition award, thereby enhancing value for taxpayer funds.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and WarehousingSupport Activities for Air TransportationOther Support Activities for Air Transportation

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp (UEI: 001344142)

Address: 6900 MAIN ST, STRATFORD, CT, 06614

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,511,775

Exercised Options: $21,511,775

Current Obligation: $21,511,775

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001914D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-11-22

Current End Date: 2014-10-31

Potential End Date: 2014-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-07-08

More Contracts from Sikorsky Support Services Inc

View all Sikorsky Support Services Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending