DoD's $22.6M environmental remediation contract for Allegany Ballistics Laboratory awarded to Tetra Tech EC, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,627,169 ($22.6M)
Contractor: Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2014-03-31
End Date: 2022-09-21
Contract Duration: 3,096 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF PERFORMING THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION FOR SITE 1 SOILS, OPERABLE UNIT 4 (OU-4), AT ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY, ROCKET CENTER, WV
Place of Performance
Location: KEYSER, MINERAL County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26726
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.6 million to TETRA TECH EC, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF PERFORMING THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION FOR SITE 1 SOILS, OPERABLE UNIT 4 (OU-4), AT ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY, ROCKET CENTER, WV Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which incentivizes performance but can lead to higher costs. 3. Duration of the contract was substantial at 3096 days, indicating a long-term project. 4. The contract was for remediation services, a critical environmental function for government facilities. 5. The contract was a delivery order, implying it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without access to the original IDIQ or comparable remediation contracts. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure means the final cost is tied to performance, making direct price comparisons difficult. However, the total award amount of $22.6 million over nearly 8.5 years suggests a significant investment in environmental cleanup. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit remediation costs against industry standards for similar soil remediation projects.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically leads to a more robust price discovery process and potentially better value for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests multiple entities likely vied for this work.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the public, through the environmental cleanup of a former military site. Services delivered include remediation of soils at Operable Unit 4 (OU-4) of the Allegany Ballistics Laboratory. The geographic impact is localized to Rocket Center, West Virginia, where the facility is located. The contract supports the environmental remediation workforce, likely involving specialized engineers and technicians.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can sometimes lead to costs exceeding initial estimates if award fees are consistently met without strict cost controls.
- The long duration of the contract (over 8 years) increases the risk of scope creep or unforeseen environmental challenges.
- Lack of specific details on the number of bidders and the competitive range makes it difficult to fully assess the price competitiveness.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing.
- The contract addresses a critical environmental remediation need for a Department of Defense facility.
- The Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivizes contractor performance and successful project completion.
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation services represent a significant sector within government contracting, particularly for agencies managing legacy industrial or military sites. The market includes specialized firms capable of handling complex cleanup operations. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements, environmental stewardship goals, and the need to manage risks associated with contaminated sites. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale environmental cleanup contracts awarded by agencies like the EPA or other military branches.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. Given the nature and scale of environmental remediation, it is possible that larger firms like Tetra Tech EC, Inc. would be the primary awardees, potentially utilizing small businesses for specialized support services if subcontracting opportunities were available.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigate fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics and detailed cost breakdowns may not always be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Cleanup Programs
- Superfund Site Remediation
- Military Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental Actions
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost growth due to Cost Plus Award Fee structure.
- Long contract duration increases risk of unforeseen issues.
- Lack of specific competition details limits value assessment.
Tags
environmental-remediation, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, west-virginia, remediation-services, long-term-contract, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.6 million to TETRA TECH EC, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF PERFORMING THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR THE REMEDIAL ACTION FOR SITE 1 SOILS, OPERABLE UNIT 4 (OU-4), AT ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LABORATORY, ROCKET CENTER, WV
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH EC, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-03-31. End: 2022-09-21.
What was the specific nature of the soil contamination at OU-4, and what remediation technologies were employed?
The provided data does not specify the exact contaminants or remediation technologies used for Operable Unit 4 (OU-4) soils at the Allegany Ballistics Laboratory. Environmental remediation projects of this nature often address a range of contaminants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), heavy metals, or petroleum products, depending on the historical industrial activities at the site. Remediation techniques can vary widely and may include excavation and off-site disposal, in-situ treatment (e.g., bioremediation, chemical oxidation), soil vapor extraction, or containment measures. A detailed project report or the contract's statement of work would be necessary to identify the specific contaminants and methods.
How did Tetra Tech EC, Inc.'s performance compare to the award fee criteria, and did they consistently achieve maximum award fees?
The provided data does not include details on Tetra Tech EC, Inc.'s performance against the award fee criteria for this contract. Contracts structured as Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) include specific performance metrics related to cost control, schedule adherence, technical execution, and safety. The contractor is eligible for award fees based on how well they meet or exceed these predefined criteria. Without access to the contract's performance evaluations or award fee determinations, it's impossible to assess whether Tetra Tech consistently achieved maximum award fees or how their performance was rated. This information is typically found in contract administration records.
What was the total number of bidders for this delivery order, and what was the range of proposed prices?
The data indicates the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' which implies that multiple bidders were likely solicited. However, the specific number of bidders and the range of proposed prices are not provided in the summary data. For delivery orders under an IDIQ contract, the competition details (number of bidders, price range) are often documented in the internal procurement records of the issuing agency (Department of the Navy in this case). Publicly available contract databases may list the awardee and total value but often omit these granular competitive details.
What is the historical spending trend for environmental remediation services at the Allegany Ballistics Laboratory or similar DoD facilities?
The provided data focuses solely on this specific $22.6 million contract awarded in 2014. It does not offer historical spending trends for environmental remediation at the Allegany Ballistics Laboratory or comparable Department of Defense (DoD) facilities. Analyzing historical spending would require accessing multi-year contract databases, budget reports, and program documentation for the DoD's environmental restoration programs. Such an analysis would reveal patterns in funding allocation, the types of remediation projects undertaken, and the average cost of similar cleanup efforts over time.
Were there any significant cost overruns or schedule delays associated with this contract, and if so, what were the reasons?
The provided data indicates the contract duration was 3096 days (approximately 8.5 years) and the total award amount was $22,627,169. While this represents a substantial period and value, the data does not specify whether there were significant cost overruns or schedule delays beyond the initial estimates. Contracts with long durations, especially in complex fields like environmental remediation, often experience adjustments due to unforeseen site conditions, regulatory changes, or evolving remediation strategies. A thorough review of contract modifications, performance reports, and agency documentation would be needed to determine the extent and reasons for any deviations from the original plan.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6247011R8005
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc. (UEI: 045224250)
Address: 5250 CHALLEDON DR, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23462
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,627,169
Exercised Options: $22,627,169
Current Obligation: $22,627,169
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 72
Total Subaward Amount: $13,079,845
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247013D8007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-03-31
Current End Date: 2022-09-21
Potential End Date: 2022-09-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-03-04
More Contracts from Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
- Federal Contract — $238.4M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $83.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200511!001673!5700!fa8903!hsw/Pkv !FA890304D8677 !A!N! !N!0034 ! !20050808!20060131!129280421!128974271!045224250!n!tetra Tech EC, Inc !143 Union Blvd STE 1010 !lakewood !CO!80228!00000! !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000002576213!n!n!000000000000!z111!maint/Office Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !* !562910!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20081231!B! ! !A! !a!u!u!2!003!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $64.3M (Department of Defense)
- Bachelor Enlisted Quarters and Expeditionary Housing — $63.7M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $56.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)