Fort Campbell Microgrid Project Awarded to Ameresco Inc. for $19.4M Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,441,824 ($19.4M)
Contractor: Ameresco Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-09-28
End Date: 2025-11-27
Contract Duration: 1,156 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: DESIGN-BUILD (D/B) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF A MICROGRID AT FORT CAMPBELL, KY
Place of Performance
Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.4 million to AMERESCO INC for work described as: DESIGN-BUILD (D/B) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF A MICROGRID AT FORT CAMPBELL, KY Key points: 1. Project involves design-build construction of a microgrid at Fort Campbell, KY. 2. Ameresco Inc. secured the $19.4M contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price definitive contract with a duration of 1156 days. 4. This project falls under the Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction NAICS code. 5. The award value is $19,441,823.73.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award value of $19.4M for a design-build microgrid project appears reasonable given the scope and complexity. Benchmarking against similar large-scale energy infrastructure projects would provide a more precise assessment, but the firm fixed price structure suggests a degree of cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This method is generally expected to drive competitive pricing and ensure the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds are being utilized efficiently, as the price was determined through a market-based process.
Public Impact
Enhances energy resilience and reliability for Fort Campbell, ensuring critical operations continue during power outages. Supports the Department of Defense's broader goals for energy independence and modernization of military infrastructure. Potential for reduced long-term energy costs for the base through more efficient power generation and distribution. Creates construction jobs and economic activity in Kentucky during the project's execution.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction challenges arise.
- Dependency on a single contractor (Ameresco Inc.) for both design and build phases.
- Long project duration increases exposure to market fluctuations in material costs.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive award price.
- Project addresses critical infrastructure needs for national security.
- Enhances energy security and resilience for a key military installation.
Sector Analysis
This project falls within the construction sector, specifically related to power infrastructure. Spending on military base modernization and energy resilience projects has been a priority for the Department of Defense, with significant investments in microgrids and renewable energy solutions.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). While the primary contractor is Ameresco Inc., there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors on this project, though this is not explicitly stated in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made under a definitive contract by the Department of the Army, suggesting established procurement processes. Oversight will be crucial to ensure the project stays on schedule and within budget, given its complexity and duration.
Related Government Programs
- Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to construction complexity.
- Long contract duration increases risk exposure.
- Lack of explicit small business participation noted.
- Dependency on a single prime contractor for design and build.
Tags
power-and-communication-line-and-related, department-of-defense, ky, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.4 million to AMERESCO INC. DESIGN-BUILD (D/B) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF A MICROGRID AT FORT CAMPBELL, KY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMERESCO INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-09-28. End: 2025-11-27.
What are the specific performance metrics for the microgrid's reliability and efficiency, and how will they be measured and verified post-construction?
Performance metrics typically include uptime percentages, power quality standards (voltage and frequency stability), and energy efficiency ratings. Verification involves rigorous testing during commissioning and ongoing monitoring throughout the system's operational life. The contract should detail these metrics and the government's right to inspect and test the system to ensure compliance.
What are the contingency plans and associated budget allocations for potential construction delays or unforeseen site conditions at Fort Campbell?
Contingency plans often involve pre-defined procedures for addressing issues like weather delays, discovery of hazardous materials, or unexpected subsurface conditions. A portion of the contract value, or a separate contingency fund, is usually allocated for these unforeseen circumstances. The contract's clauses on change orders and dispute resolution would outline the process for managing and funding such events.
How does the projected long-term operational cost savings from the microgrid compare to the initial investment and ongoing maintenance expenses?
The projected savings are typically calculated based on reduced energy procurement costs, potential for grid services revenue, and avoidance of costs associated with power outages. A thorough life-cycle cost analysis should compare these savings against the upfront construction cost and projected annual maintenance, repair, and operational expenses to determine the overall return on investment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Utility System Construction › Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912QR22R0008
Offers Received: 14
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: SUITE 410, FRAMINGHAM, MA, 01701
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,441,824
Exercised Options: $19,441,824
Current Obligation: $19,441,824
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-09-28
Current End Date: 2025-11-27
Potential End Date: 2025-11-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-06
More Contracts from Ameresco Inc
- Energy Savings Performance Contract, National Deep Energy Retrofit Program Round 7, Region 5 for Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures AT the Bean Federal Center, Indianapolis and 24 Other Buildings Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin — $217.3M (General Services Administration)
- Energy Savings Performance Contract, National Deep Energy Retrofit Program Round 6, Region 8 for Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures AT the Denver Federal Center and the US Courthouse in Downtown Denver — $111.9M (General Services Administration)
- Veterans Integrated Service Network (visn) 7 Energy Savings Performance Contract (espc) — $94.7M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Butner Espc — $80.7M (Department of Justice)
- Energy Savings Performance Contract for Norfolk Naval Ship Yard, Portsmouth, Virginia — $74.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)