DoD's $33.3M environmental remediation contract awarded to HydroGeoLogic, Inc. for Florida bases
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $33,324,896 ($33.3M)
Contractor: Hydrogeologic, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-09-30
End Date: 2031-09-29
Contract Duration: 3,651 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OPTIMIZED ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES FOR AFCEC IN EAST FLORIDA AT CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, PATRICK SPACE FORCE BASE, AND HOMESTEAD AIR RESERVE BASE
Place of Performance
Location: CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32920
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $33.3 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC. for work described as: OPTIMIZED ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES FOR AFCEC IN EAST FLORIDA AT CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, PATRICK SPACE FORCE BASE, AND HOMESTEAD AIR RESERVE BASE Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical environmental remediation services at key Air Force installations. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The contract duration is extensive, spanning over 10 years, indicating long-term needs. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 562910 points to specialized remediation services. 6. Geographic focus on Florida bases highlights regional environmental priorities. 7. No small business set-aside was applied, potentially limiting direct small business participation.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of $33.3 million over 10 years averages to approximately $3.3 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale environmental remediation contracts for federal agencies is challenging without more specific service details. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests an effort to control costs. The award to a single contractor implies a thorough evaluation process was completed, aiming for best value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' While the 'full and open' aspect indicates a broad solicitation, the 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests specific criteria or prior exclusions may have been applied, which warrants further investigation. The number of bidders is not specified, but the competitive nature should theoretically drive price discovery and ensure fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to solicit the widest range of potential solutions and pricing, leading to potentially lower costs and better service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its installations, ensuring environmental compliance and safety. Services delivered include optimized environmental remediation, crucial for maintaining operational readiness and environmental stewardship. The geographic impact is concentrated in Florida, specifically at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Patrick Space Force Base, and Homestead Air Reserve Base. Workforce implications may include specialized environmental scientists, engineers, and technicians employed by the prime contractor and potentially subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'exclusion of sources' clause in the competition type requires clarification to ensure no viable small businesses were unduly excluded.
- Lack of explicit small business set-aside or subcontracting goals may limit opportunities for small businesses in this significant contract.
Positive Signals
- The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, reducing the risk of cost overruns.
- The long-term nature of the contract (over 10 years) allows for consistent application of remediation strategies and builds contractor expertise.
- Awarding to a single entity suggests a thorough vetting process, potentially indicating a contractor with a strong track record in environmental remediation.
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation services represent a significant sector within government contracting, driven by regulatory requirements and the need to manage legacy contamination at federal facilities. The market includes specialized firms capable of handling complex environmental challenges. This contract fits within the broader defense sector's infrastructure and environmental management needs, with comparable spending benchmarks varying widely based on the scope and complexity of remediation required.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside, as indicated by the 'ss' field being false. This means the competition was open to all responsible sources, including large businesses. While subcontracting opportunities may exist, there are no explicit requirements detailed here for small business participation. This could limit the direct flow of funds to the small business ecosystem for this specific contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting command and the relevant Air Force installation commands. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental Programs
- Department of Defense Environmental Restoration Program
- Superfund Remedial Actions
Risk Flags
- Potential limitation of competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals.
- Long contract duration may require adaptive management for evolving environmental regulations.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts can sometimes disincentivize innovation if not structured carefully.
Tags
environmental-remediation, department-of-defense, air-force, florida, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, long-term-contract, cape-canaveral-air-force-station, patrick-space-force-base, homestead-air-reserve-base, remediation-services, hydrogeologic-inc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $33.3 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC.. OPTIMIZED ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES FOR AFCEC IN EAST FLORIDA AT CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, PATRICK SPACE FORCE BASE, AND HOMESTEAD AIR RESERVE BASE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $33.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-09-30. End: 2031-09-29.
What is the historical spending pattern for environmental remediation services at these specific Florida Air Force bases?
Analyzing historical spending for environmental remediation at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Patrick Space Force Base, and Homestead Air Reserve Base would provide crucial context for the $33.3 million awarded to HydroGeoLogic, Inc. Without access to specific historical contract data for these installations, it's difficult to establish a precise pattern. However, federal agencies, particularly the Department of Defense, consistently allocate significant funds towards environmental compliance and remediation due to the long-term impact of past activities. Spending often fluctuates based on identified contamination, regulatory changes, and the lifecycle of remediation projects. A multi-year contract like this suggests a sustained need, potentially indicating ongoing or newly identified environmental challenges requiring long-term management and cleanup efforts across these Florida bases.
How does the per-unit cost of remediation services under this contract compare to industry benchmarks?
Determining a precise per-unit cost for comparison is challenging without detailed breakdowns of the specific remediation tasks and their associated units (e.g., cubic yards of soil treated, gallons of water remediated, monitoring well installations). The contract is a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) award valued at $33.3 million over approximately 10 years. This structure aims for cost certainty for the government. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare the contractor's proposed costs for specific, quantifiable remediation activities against prevailing market rates for similar services in the Florida region and nationally. Industry reports from environmental consulting firms or government cost-analysis databases could provide benchmarks, but direct comparison requires granular data on the scope of work and the pricing structure within the awarded contract.
What is HydroGeoLogic, Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale environmental remediation contracts for the Department of Defense?
HydroGeoLogic, Inc. (now part of AECOM) has a documented history of performing environmental services for various government agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their portfolio often includes site investigation, remediation design, and construction management for complex environmental projects. For large-scale remediation contracts, their experience would likely encompass managing multiple sites, adhering to stringent regulatory requirements (like RCRA and CERCLA), and employing diverse remediation technologies. Assessing their specific track record for contracts of similar magnitude and complexity to this $33.3 million award would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, contract awards databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov), and any publicly available project summaries or case studies provided by the company or its parent organization. Their successful bid suggests they met the DoD's criteria for capability and past performance.
What are the primary environmental risks being addressed by this contract, and how effective are the planned remediation strategies?
The primary environmental risks addressed by this contract likely stem from historical activities at the Air Force installations, potentially involving fuel spills, chemical storage, aircraft maintenance operations, and waste disposal. These could lead to soil and groundwater contamination by volatile organic compounds (VOCs), heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, and other hazardous substances. The effectiveness of the planned remediation strategies is contingent upon the specific technologies selected (e.g., in-situ chemical oxidation, soil vapor extraction, groundwater pump-and-treat) and their suitability for the identified contaminants and site geology. While the contract specifies 'optimized environmental remediation,' detailed effectiveness metrics and monitoring plans would be outlined in the contract's statement of work and subsequent technical proposals. Ongoing performance monitoring and periodic reviews by the government contracting officer's representative (COR) are crucial for ensuring the strategies remain effective throughout the contract's duration.
How does the 'exclusion of sources' clause in the competition type potentially impact the overall value and innovation brought to the contract?
The 'exclusion of sources' clause within a 'full and open competition' framework is unusual and warrants careful consideration. Typically, 'full and open' implies soliciting bids from all responsible sources without restriction. The addition of 'exclusion of sources' suggests that prior to the final solicitation, certain potential bidders may have been identified and excluded, possibly due to pre-qualification requirements, specific technical capabilities needed, or previous performance issues. While this might streamline the process by focusing on a known pool of capable contractors, it could inadvertently limit the breadth of innovation and potentially reduce competitive pressure if the excluded sources represented significant competition. The impact on overall value depends heavily on the justification for the exclusion; if based on essential, unique qualifications, it might ensure specialized expertise. However, if the exclusions were arbitrary, it could lead to a less competitive environment and potentially higher costs or fewer innovative solutions than a truly unrestricted competition.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912QR18R0007
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11107 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 400, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $49,949,239
Exercised Options: $33,324,896
Current Obligation: $33,324,896
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912QR19D0051
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-09-30
Current End Date: 2031-09-29
Potential End Date: 2031-09-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-29
More Contracts from Hydrogeologic, Inc.
- Racs II Region III Contract — $59.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- FY21 Norco HGL — $55.7M (Department of Defense)
- Remediation/Demolition of U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center (ccdc) and U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (mricd) Facilities Group 2 Facilities Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland — $49.9M (Department of Defense)
- Performance Based Remediation Services — $48.6M (Department of Defense)
- APG Remediation/Demolition Group 1 — $37.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)