Army awards $48.6M Fort Benjamin Harrison construction contract to Hunt Construction Group
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $48,559,760 ($48.6M)
Contractor: Hunt Construction Group Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-05-04
End Date: 2015-10-10
Contract Duration: 1,254 days
Daily Burn Rate: $38.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF FT. BENJAMIN ARC CONSTRUCTION
Place of Performance
Location: INDIANAPOLIS, MARION County, INDIANA, 46205
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $48.6 million to HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF FT. BENJAMIN ARC CONSTRUCTION Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Hunt Construction Group for $48.6 million. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this contract. 3. The contract duration was 1254 days. 4. The project falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Army.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $48.6 million for a large construction project appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale institutional building projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition suggests a robust price discovery process. This method allows multiple qualified contractors to bid, driving competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently due to the competitive bidding process, ensuring a fair market price for the construction services.
Public Impact
Construction project at Fort Benjamin Harrison will enhance facilities. Local and national construction firms had the opportunity to bid. The project supports military infrastructure development. Completion of the project contributes to operational readiness.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in large construction projects.
- Delays in project completion could impact facility readiness.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Contract awarded to a known construction entity.
- Fixed price contract helps control costs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Spending in this sector is crucial for maintaining and upgrading federal infrastructure, with benchmarks varying significantly based on project size and complexity.
Small Business Impact
While the primary award went to Hunt Construction Group, the full and open competition process may have allowed for subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within specific trades or services required for the project.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army's contracting process, including the use of full and open competition, is subject to oversight to ensure fairness and adherence to federal acquisition regulations. Performance monitoring throughout the contract duration is key.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Large contract value increases potential for cost overruns.
- Long contract duration presents schedule risk.
- Construction projects are susceptible to external economic factors (e.g., material costs).
- Potential for change orders impacting final cost.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, in, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $48.6 million to HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC. IGF::OT::IGF FT. BENJAMIN ARC CONSTRUCTION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $48.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-05-04. End: 2015-10-10.
What was the specific scope of work for this construction project and how did it align with the awarded price?
The data indicates the project was for Commercial and Institutional Building Construction at Fort Benjamin Harrison. While the exact scope isn't detailed, the $48.6 million price tag suggests a substantial undertaking, likely involving new construction or significant renovation of facilities. A detailed breakdown of the construction elements, materials, and labor would be needed to fully assess the value proposition against the cost.
Were there any significant risks identified during the bidding process or contract execution that could have impacted the final cost or timeline?
Large construction projects inherently carry risks such as unforeseen site conditions, material price fluctuations, and labor availability. The fixed-price nature of this contract shifts some of that risk to the contractor, Hunt Construction Group. However, the agency would still monitor for scope creep or change orders that could increase costs.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers in this instance?
The full and open competition method is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bids, which typically drives down prices. Assuming Hunt Construction Group submitted a competitive bid among several qualified offers, this process likely resulted in a fair market price for the construction services, benefiting taxpayers by avoiding inflated costs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912QR12R0010
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)
Address: 6720 N SCOTTSDALE RD STE 300, SCOTTSDALE, AZ, 85253
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $48,559,760
Exercised Options: $48,559,760
Current Obligation: $48,559,760
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $14,027,156
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-05-04
Current End Date: 2015-10-10
Potential End Date: 2015-10-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-06-04
More Contracts from Hunt Construction Group Inc
- Cleveland/Hopkins International Airport (CLE) NEW Atct: Construction Funds Request TAS::69 8107::TAS — $47.7M (Department of Transportation)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)