DoD's $23.4M Ft. Benning construction contract awarded to Brasfield & Gorrie LLC shows fair value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,420,741 ($23.4M)

Contractor: Brasfield & Gorrie LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-01-04

End Date: 2012-04-10

Contract Duration: 827 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 23

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCT ECS & TEMF, FT BENNING, GA

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BENNING, CHATTAHOOCHEE County, GEORGIA, 31905

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.4 million to BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCT ECS & TEMF, FT BENNING, GA Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type likely transferred risk to the contractor, potentially stabilizing costs. 3. The duration of the contract (827 days) indicates a significant project scope. 4. The contract was awarded to a single entity, Brasfield & Gorrie LLC. 5. The project falls under commercial and institutional building construction. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of approximately $23.4 million for construction services at Ft. Benning, Georgia, appears reasonable given the project's scope and duration. While direct comparisons are difficult without specific project details, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the initial bid reflected the expected costs and risks. The award amount was within the expected range for similar large-scale construction projects managed by the Department of the Army.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely invited to submit proposals. The presence of 23 bids suggests a robust competitive process, which typically drives down prices and encourages efficiency. The government received a competitive offer from Brasfield & Gorrie LLC.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army and its personnel stationed at Ft. Benning, Georgia, who will utilize the constructed facilities. The contract delivered essential construction services for institutional buildings. The geographic impact is localized to Ft. Benning, Georgia. The project likely supported construction jobs in the Georgia region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, though mitigated by firm-fixed-price.
Contractor performance risks, including schedule delays or quality issues, are inherent in large construction projects.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
The contractor, Brasfield & Gorrie LLC, is a well-established construction firm.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The Department of Defense is a significant client for construction services, undertaking numerous projects to maintain and expand its infrastructure. Benchmarks for similar projects would typically consider factors like square footage, complexity, and location. The $23.4 million award is substantial, reflecting a significant construction undertaking.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Brasfield & Gorrie LLC voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army's contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified construction within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Projects
Department of Defense Facilities Management

Risk Flags

Potential for schedule delays
Risk of unforeseen site conditions
Quality control during construction

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.4 million to BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC. CONSTRUCT ECS & TEMF, FT BENNING, GA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-01-04. End: 2012-04-10.

What was the specific nature of the 'ECS & TEMF' construction at Ft. Benning?

The abbreviation 'ECS & TEMF' likely refers to specific types of facilities or construction elements at Ft. Benning. 'ECS' could stand for 'Enlisted Complex Services' or similar, relating to barracks or support buildings for enlisted personnel. 'TEMF' might denote 'Training and Equipment Maintenance Facility' or a related support structure. Without further documentation, the precise nature remains speculative, but it clearly falls under the umbrella of institutional building construction essential for military base operations and training.

How does the $23.4 million contract value compare to similar construction projects at other military bases?

Comparing the $23.4 million value requires context on the scope, size, and specific purpose of the construction. However, for large-scale institutional or barracks construction at major military installations, this figure is within a common range. Projects involving new building construction, significant renovations, or specialized facilities can easily reach tens of millions of dollars. Factors like prevailing wages, material costs in the specific region (Georgia), and the complexity of the build (e.g., specialized infrastructure requirements) influence the final cost. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests this was the agreed-upon cost after competitive bidding.

What is Brasfield & Gorrie LLC's track record with large federal construction contracts?

Brasfield & Gorrie LLC is a well-established and reputable general contractor with extensive experience in large-scale commercial, institutional, and infrastructure projects, including significant work for government and military clients. They have a history of successfully completing complex projects across various sectors. Their track record typically involves managing substantial budgets, adhering to strict timelines, and meeting rigorous quality standards, which are critical for federal contracts. Their experience suggests a lower risk profile for performance compared to less experienced firms.

Were there any significant cost changes or contract modifications during the life of this contract?

The provided data does not detail contract modifications or changes to the original award amount. However, for a contract of this duration (827 days, over two years), it is not uncommon for modifications to occur due to unforeseen circumstances, scope adjustments, or change orders. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to minimize cost increases, but modifications can still happen, often related to differing site conditions or government-directed changes. A thorough review of the contract's official modification history would be needed to confirm any changes.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract?

Key performance indicators for a construction contract like this typically revolve around schedule adherence, quality of work, safety compliance, and adherence to the contract specifications. For the Department of the Army, meeting deadlines for facility readiness is crucial. Quality would be assessed against construction standards and blueprints. Safety is paramount on construction sites, with metrics often tracked for incident rates. While specific KPIs for this contract aren't listed, these are standard expectations for federal construction projects, and performance against them would inform contractor evaluations.

How does the number of bids (23) reflect the competitiveness of the market for this type of construction?

Receiving 23 bids for a construction project of this magnitude ($23.4 million) indicates a highly competitive market for commercial and institutional building construction services, particularly within the geographic region of Georgia and for Department of Defense contracts. A large number of bidders suggests that the opportunity was attractive and that multiple firms possessed the capability and interest to pursue the work. This level of competition generally benefits the government by driving down prices and encouraging innovation and efficiency from the bidders.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912QR09R0086

Offers Received: 23

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3021 7TH AVE SOUTH, BIRMINGHAM, AL, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,420,741

Exercised Options: $23,420,741

Current Obligation: $23,420,741

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline