DOD awards $27.8M for Fort Campbell Operations Complex construction, completed in 2011
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,840,776 ($27.8M)
Contractor: BL Harbert International LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-06-28
End Date: 2011-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,372 days
Daily Burn Rate: $20.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: FT CAMPBELL BN OPNS COMPLEX
Place of Performance
Location: FORT CAMPBELL, LAUREL County, KENTUCKY, 42223
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.8 million to BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL LLC for work described as: FT CAMPBELL BN OPNS COMPLEX Key points: 1. Construction project completed on time and within budget. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract indicates clear cost expectations. 3. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 4. Project was awarded to a single contractor, BL Harbert International LLC. 5. The contract duration was 1372 days. 6. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $27.8 million for a large-scale operations complex appears reasonable given the scope of construction. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects of this size and complexity would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that cost overruns were largely borne by the contractor, which is a positive indicator for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With 4 bidders, the competition level was moderate, suggesting that the government received multiple proposals. This level of competition generally helps in achieving fair market prices and encourages contractors to offer competitive bids.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
Military personnel at Fort Campbell will benefit from improved operational facilities. The construction services delivered enhance the infrastructure supporting military readiness. The geographic impact is localized to Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The project likely involved a significant construction workforce, contributing to local employment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if initial estimates were inaccurate, though mitigated by FFP.
- Dependence on a single contractor for the entire project scope.
- Quality control and adherence to construction standards require diligent oversight.
Positive Signals
- Completion within the scheduled timeframe.
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting fair pricing.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The market for large-scale military construction is characterized by a limited number of large, experienced firms capable of undertaking such projects. Spending in this area is driven by military modernization, base infrastructure upgrades, and operational needs, often involving significant capital investment.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. While the prime contractor, BL Harbert International LLC, is a large business, there may have been opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this construction contract would typically involve the Department of the Army's contracting officer representatives (CORs) and potentially quality assurance personnel to monitor progress, ensure compliance with specifications, and manage payments. Inspector General involvement would be triggered by allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction (MILCON) Program
- Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) projects
- Department of Defense Facilities Management
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope changes were not managed effectively.
- Quality assurance and adherence to construction standards require ongoing monitoring.
- Dependence on a single contractor for project completion.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, construction, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, military-construction, operations-complex, fort-campbell, kentucky, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.8 million to BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL LLC. FT CAMPBELL BN OPNS COMPLEX
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-06-28. End: 2011-03-31.
What was the initial estimated cost of the project compared to the final award amount?
The provided data indicates a final award amount of $27,840,776. However, the initial estimated cost is not available in the provided data. To assess the value and efficiency of the procurement, a comparison between the government's estimate and the final award price is crucial. A significant difference could indicate issues with the initial estimate, the bidding process, or scope changes during the contract period. Without the estimate, it's difficult to definitively state if the award was optimal from a cost perspective, though the firm fixed-price nature suggests cost control was a priority.
How does the cost per square foot of this operations complex compare to similar military construction projects?
The provided data does not include the square footage of the Fort Campbell Operations Complex, making a direct cost-per-square-foot comparison impossible. To benchmark effectively, one would need the total square footage and compare it to the cost per square foot of other recently constructed military operations facilities or similar institutional buildings. Factors such as building complexity, materials used, and specific functional requirements heavily influence cost per square foot. A higher cost per square foot might be justified by specialized features or higher-end finishes, while a lower cost could indicate efficient design or standard construction methods.
What is BL Harbert International LLC's track record with similar Department of Defense construction contracts?
BL Harbert International LLC has a significant history of contracting with the Department of Defense for construction projects, including overseas and domestic military facilities. Their portfolio often includes large-scale projects similar in nature to the Fort Campbell Operations Complex. Analyzing their past performance ratings, any contract disputes, or instances of cost overruns/delays on previous DoD contracts would provide insight into their reliability and capability for executing complex projects. Generally, their extensive experience suggests a strong capacity for such work.
Were there any significant scope changes or change orders issued during the contract period?
The provided data does not detail any change orders or scope modifications that may have occurred during the contract's performance period (June 28, 2007, to March 31, 2011). For a firm fixed-price contract, change orders can significantly impact the final cost and timeline if not managed carefully. Investigating the contract's modification history would reveal if adjustments were made and whether they were adequately justified and priced, ensuring that the final cost remained competitive and aligned with the project's evolving needs.
What were the primary performance metrics used to evaluate the success of this construction project?
While specific performance metrics are not detailed in the provided data, typical evaluations for large construction projects like this would focus on adherence to the construction schedule, quality of workmanship, compliance with design specifications and building codes, safety record, and overall project management. The successful completion within the contract duration (1372 days) and the firm fixed-price nature suggest that key performance indicators related to cost and schedule were likely met. Post-occupancy evaluations might also assess the functionality and durability of the completed facility.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912QR07R0018
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: B.L. Harbert Holdings, L.L.C. (UEI: 147371236)
Address: 820 SHADES CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,840,776
Exercised Options: $27,840,776
Current Obligation: $27,840,776
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-06-28
Current End Date: 2011-03-31
Potential End Date: 2011-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-11-15
More Contracts from BL Harbert International LLC
- TAS::19 0535 000::TAS NEW Embassey Compound and Housing, Islamabad, Pakistan — $871.5M (Department of State)
- Base Award for Construction Manager AS Constructor Clin-001 for Design-Phase Services for Hanoi NEC — $815.9M (Department of State)
- Beirut, Lebanon NEW Embassy Constructionigf::cl::igf — $731.6M (Department of State)
- Construction Services for the NEW Embassy Compound in NEW Delhi, India — $685.1M (Department of State)
- Construction Services for NEW Emabssy Compound in London, England. Igf::ot::igf — $636.0M (Department of State)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)