Cox Construction awarded $19.9M contract for heavy civil engineering construction by the Department of the Army
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,937,887 ($19.9M)
Contractor: COX Construction CO
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-03-11
End Date: 2006-12-13
Contract Duration: 642 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Place of Performance
Location: FORT IRWIN, SAN BERNARDINO County, CALIFORNIA, 92310, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.9 million to COX CONSTRUCTION CO for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $19.9 million indicates a significant investment in infrastructure. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs and manage contractor risk. 4. Duration of 642 days points to a substantial, multi-year project. 5. Project located in California, potentially impacting regional economic development. 6. Contractor Cox Construction Co. has secured a notable federal award.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $19.9 million for heavy and civil engineering construction appears reasonable given the project's scope and duration. Without specific details on the exact services rendered or comparable projects in the immediate vicinity, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests an effort to ensure cost predictability. The number of bids received (4) indicates a degree of market interest, which can contribute to fair pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Four bids were received, indicating a competitive environment for this project. The level of competition suggests that the government likely received a range of pricing and technical proposals, allowing for selection of the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation, leading to better value for public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Army, receiving essential heavy and civil engineering construction services. The project will result in the delivery of critical infrastructure improvements. Geographic impact is concentrated in California, potentially creating local jobs and stimulating the regional economy. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for skilled construction labor in California.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite the fixed-price nature.
- Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage a complex, multi-year project effectively.
- Risk of delays due to weather, permitting, or supply chain issues common in large construction projects.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a thorough vetting of potential contractors.
- Award to Cox Construction Co. indicates a selection based on qualifications and proposed value.
- Project duration of over 600 days allows for phased execution and quality control.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, a critical component of national infrastructure development. This sector encompasses a wide range of projects, including roads, bridges, utilities, and other large-scale public works. Federal spending in this area is often driven by military base improvements, transportation initiatives, and disaster recovery efforts. The market size for federal construction contracts is substantial, with numerous firms competing for awards.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. The award to Cox Construction Co. suggests that larger firms were the primary participants in this competitive bidding process. This may limit direct opportunities for small businesses to engage in this specific federal project, though they might be involved further down the supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and their representatives within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project details and oversight reports may vary in accessibility.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction Projects
- Federal Infrastructure Development
- Heavy Equipment Procurement
- Civil Engineering Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise.
- Risk of project delays due to external factors.
- Contractor performance risk on a multi-year project.
Tags
construction, heavy-civil-engineering, department-of-the-army, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, california, large-contract, infrastructure, dod
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.9 million to COX CONSTRUCTION CO. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is COX CONSTRUCTION CO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-03-11. End: 2006-12-13.
What specific types of heavy and civil engineering construction were performed under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' category (NAICS 237990). This broad classification typically includes projects such as the construction of dams, reservoirs, tunnels, bridges, highways, streets, airports, and other large-scale infrastructure. Without more specific contract line item details or project descriptions, the exact nature of the work performed by Cox Construction Co. remains general. However, given the Department of the Army as the awarding agency, it could involve improvements to military bases, training facilities, or related logistical infrastructure.
How does the $19.9 million award compare to typical federal spending on similar heavy and civil engineering projects?
The $19.9 million award is a substantial sum, placing it in the mid-to-large range for federal construction contracts. Federal spending on heavy and civil engineering projects can vary widely, from smaller repair and maintenance contracts to multi-billion dollar programs like major highway or airport expansions. For a single project awarded under full and open competition with four bidders, this value suggests a significant undertaking. Benchmarking requires comparison to projects of similar scope, complexity, and location, which is not fully detailed here. However, it represents a considerable investment in infrastructure by the Department of the Army.
What are the key risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract of this duration (642 days)?
While a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract aims to control costs, risks remain, especially for a project spanning 642 days. The primary risk for the government is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or materials to maintain profitability if unforeseen issues arise, although quality assurance measures should mitigate this. For the contractor, the main risk is underestimating costs or encountering unforeseen site conditions, scope creep, or material price escalations, which could lead to financial losses if not managed carefully. Delays due to external factors (weather, permits) can also strain the contractor's resources and potentially impact project completion, even under an FFP agreement.
What is the track record of Cox Construction Co. with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?
The provided data indicates Cox Construction Co. (CO) received this specific award from the Department of the Army (ag). To assess their track record, one would need to examine historical contract data for Cox Construction Co. across various federal agencies, especially the Department of Defense. This would involve looking at the number, value, type, and performance history of their previous federal awards. A positive history of timely completion, adherence to budget, and quality delivery on prior contracts would suggest a lower risk profile for this current award. Conversely, a history of disputes, delays, or performance issues would raise concerns.
How might this contract contribute to the economic landscape in California?
A federal contract of $19.9 million awarded to Cox Construction Co. for heavy and civil engineering work in California is likely to have a positive economic impact on the region. It will directly create jobs for construction workers, engineers, project managers, and administrative staff employed by Cox Construction Co. and potentially its subcontractors. Furthermore, the procurement of materials, equipment, and services from local suppliers and businesses will generate indirect economic activity. The completion of the project itself will likely result in improved infrastructure, which can enhance economic efficiency and quality of life in the affected area.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3170 SCOTT ST, VISTA, CA, 92081
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-03-11
Current End Date: 2006-12-13
Potential End Date: 2006-12-13 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-09-26
More Contracts from COX Construction CO
- NEW Construction, SQ OPS and AMU Beale AFB — $36.3M (Department of Defense)
- Construction of a NEW 800 Member Army Reserve Center (ARC) Located in Fallbrook, CA — $34.6M (Department of Defense)
- Construct an Unmanned Aircarft Systems Hangar AT FT Irwin. Work Includes Operations and Maintenance Hangar With Shops, Company Administration, Aircraft Container Storage, Organizational Vehicle Parking. Work Also Includes Asphalt Overaly of Existing Runway, Taiway, and Access Aparon — $33.2M (Department of Defense)
- Nogales Central Processing Center, AZ Construction — $33.0M (General Services Administration)
- Construction of Afrc AT Moreno Valley, CA — $31.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)