Robins AFB building renovation awarded to Copper Construction for $45.3M, highlighting construction sector activity

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $45,264,226 ($45.3M)

Contractor: Copper Construction Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-02

End Date: 2028-11-03

Contract Duration: 1,158 days

Daily Burn Rate: $39.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: RENOVATE BLDG. 59D - ROBINS AFB GA

Place of Performance

Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31098

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $45.3 million to COPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. for work described as: RENOVATE BLDG. 59D - ROBINS AFB GA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a large-scale building renovation project. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Project duration of nearly four years indicates a significant scope of work. 5. Awarded to a single contractor, Copper Construction Company, Inc. 6. Geographic focus on Georgia, USA.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $45.3 million for renovating Building 59D at Robins AFB is within the expected range for major facility upgrades. Benchmarking against similar large-scale commercial and institutional building construction contracts awarded by the Department of Defense, this price appears competitive. The firm fixed-price structure further supports value for money by shifting cost risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With three bids received, the competition level suggests a healthy market interest for this type of construction work. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition with multiple bidders typically results in more competitive pricing, which is beneficial for taxpayer dollars by ensuring the government is not overpaying for services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and personnel utilizing Building 59D at Robins AFB, Georgia. The contract will deliver essential renovation and modernization services for a significant federal facility. The geographic impact is concentrated in Georgia, supporting local economic activity and employment. The project will likely create or sustain jobs within the construction sector in the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this area supports infrastructure maintenance and modernization across various government agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks for large-scale federal building renovations can vary widely based on scope, location, and specific requirements, but projects in the tens of millions are common for major facility upgrades.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside. While the prime contractor is Copper Construction Company, Inc., there is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided data. Further review would be needed to assess potential subcontracting opportunities and their impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and relevant project managers within the Department of the Army at Robins AFB. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor to deliver the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project oversight details are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, robins-afb, georgia, firm-fixed-price, definitive-contract, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, building-renovation, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $45.3 million to COPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.. RENOVATE BLDG. 59D - ROBINS AFB GA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $45.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-02. End: 2028-11-03.

What is the track record of Copper Construction Company, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Copper Construction Company, Inc. has a history of performing federal construction contracts. While specific details on past performance metrics, such as on-time delivery or quality ratings, are not provided in this summary, their selection for a significant project like the Robins AFB renovation suggests they meet the necessary qualifications and experience requirements set by the Department of the Army. A deeper dive into their contract history, including any past performance evaluations or disputes, would offer a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and capabilities in executing large-scale federal projects.

How does the awarded amount of $45.3 million compare to similar building renovation projects at other military installations?

The $45.3 million award for renovating Building 59D at Robins AFB is substantial and aligns with the typical investment required for major facility upgrades at military installations. Benchmarking this figure against similar projects requires detailed comparison of scope, square footage, age of the facility, and specific renovation needs (e.g., structural, MEP, interior fit-out). However, projects of this magnitude are not uncommon for significant infrastructure improvements within the Department of Defense, which often involve complex requirements and stringent security protocols. The firm fixed-price nature suggests that this amount was deemed the best value after a competitive bidding process.

What are the primary risks associated with a multi-year construction project of this scale and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks for a multi-year construction project of this scale include potential schedule delays due to unforeseen site conditions, material availability issues, or labor shortages. Cost escalation is another risk, though mitigated by the firm fixed-price contract type, which shifts this risk to the contractor. Quality control throughout the extensive renovation process is also a concern. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust project management, detailed scheduling, contingency planning, regular site inspections, and clear communication channels between the government and the contractor. The contract's defined scope and performance standards also serve as key risk mitigation tools.

What is the expected impact of this renovation on the operational capabilities and efficiency of Building 59D at Robins AFB?

The renovation of Building 59D is expected to significantly enhance its operational capabilities and efficiency. Modernization efforts will likely address outdated systems (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing), improve energy efficiency, and potentially reconfigure interior spaces to better suit current operational needs. This could lead to reduced maintenance costs, improved working conditions for personnel, enhanced safety, and greater overall reliability of the facility. The specific improvements will depend on the detailed scope of work outlined in the contract, but the investment suggests a goal of bringing the building up to modern standards.

How has federal spending on building construction and renovation at Robins AFB trended over the past five years?

Analyzing historical spending trends for building construction and renovation at Robins AFB over the past five years would provide valuable context for this $45.3 million award. Without specific data, it's difficult to determine if this represents an increase, decrease, or average level of investment. However, federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, typically allocate significant budgets towards maintaining and upgrading aging infrastructure. Trends are often influenced by military readiness needs, budget appropriations, and long-term infrastructure investment plans. A review of publicly available contract databases for Robins AFB would reveal patterns in spending for similar construction and renovation projects.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912HN25BA007

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: HZE

Contractor Details

Address: 410 MCINTOSH ST, VIDALIA, GA, 30474

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $45,264,226

Exercised Options: $45,264,226

Current Obligation: $45,264,226

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-02

Current End Date: 2028-11-03

Potential End Date: 2028-11-03 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-11-19

More Contracts from Copper Construction Company, Inc.

View all Copper Construction Company, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending