DoD awards $64M construction contract for KC-46A bed-down, raising questions on value and competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $64,289,474 ($64.3M)

Contractor: Conti Federal Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-11-26

End Date: 2028-07-24

Contract Duration: 971 days

Daily Burn Rate: $66.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: KC46A BED-DOWN CONSTRUCTION

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $64.3 million to CONTI FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: KC46A BED-DOWN CONSTRUCTION Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Conti Federal Services, LLC for construction services. 2. Significant investment in infrastructure to support KC-46A aircraft operations. 3. Contract duration spans nearly three years, indicating a substantial project. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, but initial value needs benchmarking. 5. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process. 6. The specific location and scope of the 'bed-down' construction require further detail for full impact assessment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $64.3 million for construction services requires benchmarking against similar military infrastructure projects. Without detailed scope of work and location specifics, it is difficult to assess if this represents a fair price. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost certainty, but the overall value proposition hinges on the efficiency and quality of the construction delivered by Conti Federal Services, LLC. Further analysis of the contractor's past performance on similar projects would be beneficial.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited. The presence of four bidders, as suggested by the 'no' field, points to a competitive environment. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and potentially leads to more competitive pricing for the government. However, the specific details of the solicitation and the evaluation criteria would provide a clearer picture of the true competitive intensity.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this construction project is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple firms to offer their best pricing and services, potentially driving down the overall cost of the infrastructure development.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force and personnel operating the KC-46A Pegasus tanker aircraft, who will gain necessary operational facilities. The contract will deliver essential construction services for the KC-46A bed-down, likely including hangars, maintenance facilities, or support infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the military installation where the KC-46A aircraft are being based, requiring specific infrastructure development. The project will likely create or sustain jobs in the construction sector, both directly with the prime contractor and indirectly through subcontractors and material suppliers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically for military infrastructure. The market for large-scale federal construction projects is significant, with numerous established contractors capable of undertaking such work. This project represents a specific investment in supporting advanced aerial refueling capabilities, aligning with broader defense modernization efforts. Benchmarking against other military construction projects of similar scale and complexity would provide further context on cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, Conti Federal Services, LLC, is not identified as a small business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. Further investigation into the contractor's subcontracting goals and performance would be necessary to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures will be tied to the terms of the fixed-price definitive contract, including performance milestones and quality standards. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, but detailed project progress and spending reports may be less publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, military-infrastructure, kc-46a, large-contract, federal-contracting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $64.3 million to CONTI FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC. KC46A BED-DOWN CONSTRUCTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONTI FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $64.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-26. End: 2028-07-24.

What is the specific scope of the 'KC46A BED-DOWN CONSTRUCTION' and what are the key deliverables expected under this contract?

The 'KC46A BED-DOWN CONSTRUCTION' contract, awarded to Conti Federal Services, LLC for approximately $64.3 million, is understood to involve the construction of facilities necessary to support the basing and operations of the KC-46A Pegasus aircraft. While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, typical 'bed-down' projects for new aircraft fleets include the construction or modification of hangars, maintenance and repair facilities, flight line infrastructure, and associated support buildings. The exact scope would be defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), outlining requirements for site preparation, building construction, utility installation, and potentially specialized equipment integration. The duration of the contract, from November 26, 2025, to July 24, 2028, suggests a multi-year construction effort involving significant planning, execution, and quality assurance phases.

How does the awarded amount of $64.3 million compare to similar military construction projects for aircraft bed-down?

Benchmarking the $64.3 million award for KC-46A bed-down construction requires comparison with similar projects, considering factors like location, scope, and specific facility types. Military construction costs can vary widely based on geographic location, labor costs, material availability, and the complexity of the required facilities (e.g., specialized hangar requirements for advanced aircraft). Projects involving new aircraft basing often include significant infrastructure investments. For instance, constructing a new hangar capable of housing wide-body aircraft can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Without specific details on the number and type of facilities being built under this contract, a precise comparison is challenging. However, $64.3 million appears to be a substantial but potentially reasonable figure for a significant component of an aircraft bed-down, especially if it includes multiple structures or extensive site work.

What are the potential risks associated with a fixed-price definitive contract for a large construction project?

A fixed-price definitive contract, like the one awarded to Conti Federal Services, LLC, aims to provide cost certainty by establishing a set price for the work. However, risks can still arise. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or materials to maintain profitability if unforeseen issues increase costs. Conversely, if the contractor underestimated the project's complexity or encountered significant unforeseen conditions (e.g., subsurface issues, material price spikes), they might seek change orders, potentially leading to cost increases, or face financial strain if they cannot absorb the overruns. For a large construction project spanning nearly three years, the potential for scope creep or design changes also presents a risk that could necessitate contract modifications and impact the final cost. Effective project management and oversight are crucial to mitigate these risks.

What does the fact that this contract was awarded under 'full and open competition' with four bidders imply for the government and taxpayers?

Awarding this contract under 'full and open competition' signifies that the Department of the Army solicited proposals from all responsible sources capable of meeting the requirements. The participation of four bidders suggests a healthy level of interest and competition within the market for this type of construction service. For the government and taxpayers, this generally implies that the contract price is likely to be more competitive than if it were awarded through a sole-source or limited competition process. Competition encourages bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions to win the contract. While the specific price achieved relative to the government's estimate is not provided, the competitive nature of the award process is a positive indicator for achieving value for money and ensuring that taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

What is Conti Federal Services, LLC's track record with similar large-scale federal construction contracts, particularly for military infrastructure?

Conti Federal Services, LLC has a documented history of performing federal construction contracts, including significant projects for various government agencies. Their portfolio often includes infrastructure development, building construction, and renovation projects. While specific details on their experience with KC-46A bed-down projects are not immediately available, their general experience in large-scale federal construction suggests they possess the necessary capabilities and understanding of government contracting requirements. A thorough review of their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) and project history would provide a more precise assessment of their suitability and track record for this specific type of military infrastructure project. This would include evaluating their performance on schedule, budget, quality, and safety for comparable contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912ER25R0004

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11486 CORPORATE BLVD STE 190, ORLANDO, FL, 32817

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $64,998,730

Exercised Options: $64,289,474

Current Obligation: $64,289,474

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-11-26

Current End Date: 2028-07-24

Potential End Date: 2028-07-24 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-03

More Contracts from Conti Federal Services, LLC

View all Conti Federal Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending