DoD's $17.8M Excavation Contract Awarded to WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc. for Spoil Mound Management
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,775,463 ($17.8M)
Contractor: WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-07-17
End Date: 2011-07-18
Contract Duration: 1,096 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 60
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: EXCAVATION - SPOIL MOUND B
Place of Performance
Location: MEXICO BEACH, BAY County, FLORIDA, 32410
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.8 million to WRS INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONMENT, INC. for work described as: EXCAVATION - SPOIL MOUND B Key points: 1. Contract value of $17.8 million for excavation and spoil mound management. 2. Awarded under a definitive contract type, suggesting a long-term or complex service requirement. 3. The contract duration of 1096 days indicates a significant project timeline. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237990 points to heavy civil engineering construction. 6. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process. 7. The contractor, WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc., has secured this significant federal award.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this $17.8 million contract for excavation and spoil mound management is challenging without specific project scope details. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to cap government liability. Comparing this to similar large-scale civil engineering projects would provide better context on whether the price reflects market rates for the services rendered. The duration of over three years also implies a substantial undertaking, which could justify the overall cost if executed efficiently.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely invited to submit proposals. This competitive process is designed to ensure the government receives the best value by encouraging a range of offers. The number of bidders and the specific evaluation criteria would further illuminate the strength of the competition. A robust competition generally leads to more favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and ensuring that public funds are used efficiently to secure necessary services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and potentially the Army, receiving services for spoil mound management. The contract delivers essential heavy civil engineering construction services related to excavation and site management. Geographic impact is concentrated in Florida (ST, SN), where the services are to be performed. Workforce implications include the creation of jobs for skilled laborers, equipment operators, and project managers involved in civil engineering and environmental services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite the fixed-price nature.
- Contract duration of over three years may lead to scope creep or changes if not managed tightly.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a significant duration could pose risks if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process that likely secured a reasonable price.
- The contractor's experience in infrastructure and environment services is a positive signal for project execution.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, specifically related to excavation and environmental management. This sector is crucial for infrastructure development and maintenance. The market size for such services can be substantial, particularly for government contracts involving large-scale land management or remediation. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large excavation or spoil management contracts awarded by federal agencies or state governments.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SS: false, SB: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically mandated for small businesses through a set-aside program. However, the prime contractor, WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors based on their own procurement strategies and project needs. The absence of a set-aside means larger firms were eligible to compete, potentially impacting the landscape for smaller specialized firms.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily be managed by the contracting agency (Department of the Army) and potentially through contract officers' representatives (CORs) who monitor performance and compliance. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, but detailed performance metrics and oversight reports are not always readily available to the public.
Related Government Programs
- Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Heavy Civil Engineering Projects
- Department of Defense Infrastructure Modernization
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of performance degradation or cost escalation.
- Potential for unforeseen environmental or geological conditions impacting scope and cost.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a multi-year project requires robust performance monitoring.
Tags
construction, defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, heavy-civil-engineering, excavation, spoil-mound-management, florida, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.8 million to WRS INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONMENT, INC.. EXCAVATION - SPOIL MOUND B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WRS INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONMENT, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-07-17. End: 2011-07-18.
What is the track record of WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly in excavation and environmental services?
A thorough review of federal contract databases would be necessary to assess WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc.'s track record. This would involve examining past awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Understanding their experience with similar projects, especially those involving spoil mound management or large-scale excavation for the Department of Defense, would provide crucial context for evaluating their capability and reliability on this $17.8 million contract. Their performance on previous contracts, particularly regarding adherence to schedule, budget, and quality standards, would be key indicators.
How does the $17.8 million contract value compare to similar large-scale excavation and spoil mound management projects?
To benchmark this $17.8 million contract, one would need to identify comparable federal or state projects involving significant excavation, earthmoving, and spoil mound management. Factors such as project scope, geographic location, environmental considerations, and duration are critical for a fair comparison. For instance, if similar projects over a three-year period typically range from $15 million to $25 million, this contract might be considered within the expected market range. Conversely, if comparable projects are significantly lower or higher, it could indicate potential overpricing or underbidding, respectively. Access to detailed project specifications and cost breakdowns would enhance the accuracy of such comparisons.
What are the primary risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract of this magnitude and duration?
The primary risks with a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract of this $17.8 million value and 1096-day duration include potential contractor underestimation of costs, leading to reduced profit or even losses, which could impact performance quality or contractor viability. Conversely, if the contractor significantly overestimates, taxpayers may bear a higher cost than necessary. Unforeseen site conditions, regulatory changes, or scope creep not properly managed can strain the fixed price. The long duration increases the risk of economic fluctuations affecting material and labor costs, which the contractor must absorb. Effective government oversight is crucial to mitigate risks related to contractor performance and to manage any necessary contract modifications.
What does the 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT' award type imply for government oversight and flexibility?
A 'Definitive Contract' is a standard, legally binding agreement that clearly defines the rights and obligations of both the government and the contractor. For this $17.8 million excavation project, it implies a well-defined scope of work, price, and delivery schedule. While offering clarity, it can sometimes be less flexible than other contract types if unforeseen circumstances arise. Government oversight would focus on ensuring the contractor adheres to the contract terms, meets performance standards, and completes the work within the agreed-upon timeline and budget. Modifications to a definitive contract typically require formal amendments, ensuring a documented and controlled process for any changes.
How does the NAICS code 237990 (Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction) inform the nature of this contract?
The NAICS code 237990 signifies that this contract pertains to the construction of infrastructure projects beyond buildings, such as highways, streets, bridges, tunnels, and utility lines. For this specific contract involving excavation and spoil mound management, it indicates a focus on large-scale earthmoving, site preparation, and potentially environmental remediation or land reclamation activities. This classification suggests the project requires specialized heavy equipment, engineering expertise, and adherence to stringent safety and environmental regulations common in the heavy civil engineering sector. It helps categorize the contract within the broader construction industry and informs the types of companies that would be qualified to bid.
What is the significance of the contract being awarded in Florida (ST, SN)?
The contract's performance location in Florida (ST, SN) is significant as it dictates the specific environmental regulations, labor laws, and logistical considerations that apply. Florida's unique geological and environmental conditions, such as soil types, water tables, and potential for hurricanes, may influence the excavation methods, disposal strategies, and overall project planning. It also implies that local or regional workforce and resources will likely be utilized. Understanding the specific state and local requirements is crucial for both the contractor's execution and the government's oversight to ensure compliance and project success within that jurisdiction.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912EP08B0011
Offers Received: 60
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 221 HOBBS ST STE 108, TAMPA, FL, 33619
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,775,463
Exercised Options: $17,775,463
Current Obligation: $17,775,463
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-07-17
Current End Date: 2011-07-18
Potential End Date: 2011-07-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-03-28
More Contracts from WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc.
- Construction of Westbank and Vicinity, NEW Orleans, Louisiana Hurricane Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Lake Cataouatche, Western Tie-In WBV 72: East West Levee ST. Charles Parish, LA Award of Base Items 0001-0031 Only — $36.2M (Department of Defense)
- TAS::96 3134::TAS Recoveryproject#::12222::rp# Kissimmee River Restoration C-37 Enlargement and Miscellaneous Features — $19.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $18.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
View all WRS Infrastructure & Environment, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)