DoD's $32.3M Newton County Superfund Remediation Contract Awarded to HydroGeoLogic, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,313,084 ($32.3M)
Contractor: Hydrogeologic, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-09-26
End Date: 2027-02-27
Contract Duration: 2,711 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NEWTON COUNTY MINE WASTE SUPERFUND SITE
Place of Performance
Location: GRANBY, NEWTON County, MISSOURI, 64844
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.3 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC. for work described as: NEWTON COUNTY MINE WASTE SUPERFUND SITE Key points: 1. Contract value of $32.3 million for remediation services. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. 3. Contract type is Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 4. Performance period spans from September 2019 to February 2027. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 562910 (Remediation Services). 6. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price type. 7. The base contract has a duration of 2711 days. 8. The award was made in Missouri.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $32.3 million for remediation services appears to be within a reasonable range for a Superfund site of this nature, given the extended performance period. However, without specific benchmarks for the Newton County Mine Waste Superfund Site's complexity and the scope of work, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that cost overruns are primarily the contractor's responsibility, which can be a positive indicator for cost control. Further analysis would require comparing this contract's unit costs for specific remediation activities against similar projects.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources were excluded, potentially limiting the number of bidders. The exact reasons for the exclusion of sources are not detailed here, but it suggests a non-standard competitive process. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated, but the 'limited' competition level might imply fewer than a fully open solicitation, potentially impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may mean that taxpayers did not benefit from the lowest possible price that could have been achieved through a fully open and unrestricted bidding process. The exclusion of certain sources could have reduced competitive pressure, potentially leading to a higher overall cost.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the environmental stakeholders and the local community in Newton County, Missouri, who will see the remediation of a Superfund site. The services delivered include crucial remediation activities to address mine waste contamination. The geographic impact is focused on Newton County, Missouri, aiming to restore environmental quality. The contract supports specialized environmental engineering and remediation workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition could lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
- The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause requires further investigation to understand its impact on competition.
- Long contract duration (2019-2027) increases the risk of scope creep or unforeseen cost adjustments.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded by the Department of Defense, indicating a significant federal commitment to environmental cleanup.
- The contract addresses a critical Superfund site, demonstrating progress in environmental protection.
Sector Analysis
The environmental remediation sector is a significant part of the broader engineering and construction industry. Federal contracts for Superfund site cleanup are crucial for addressing legacy environmental contamination. This contract fits within the government's broader efforts to manage hazardous waste sites, often involving specialized firms with expertise in hydrogeology, environmental engineering, and site remediation. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be assessed based on the complexity and scale of the contamination at the specific site.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor, HydroGeoLogic, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem within the environmental services industry.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would apply to investigate fraud, waste, and abuse. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of ongoing oversight activities may not be publicly disclosed.
Related Government Programs
- Superfund Program
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Environmental Contracts
- Hazardous Waste Management
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may impact price.
- Long contract duration increases risk.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, remediation-services, superfund-site, firm-fixed-price, limited-competition, missouri, environmental-services, long-term-contract, mine-waste
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.3 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC.. NEWTON COUNTY MINE WASTE SUPERFUND SITE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-09-26. End: 2027-02-27.
What is the specific nature of the 'Exclusion of Sources' in this contract's competition?
The 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' designation suggests that while the solicitation was intended to be open, certain potential bidders were explicitly excluded from participating. The reasons for such exclusions can vary, including but not limited to, national security concerns, specific technical requirements that only a limited number of firms could meet, or prior performance issues with certain contractors. Without further documentation from the contracting agency (Department of the Army), the precise rationale behind excluding sources remains unclear. This type of competition can limit the number of bids received and potentially reduce the overall competitive pressure, which could impact the final price negotiated. It is a deviation from standard full and open competition where all responsible sources are permitted to submit offers.
How does the $32.3 million contract value compare to similar Superfund remediation projects?
Benchmarking the $32.3 million contract value for the Newton County Mine Waste Superfund Site requires detailed comparison with projects of similar scale, complexity, and duration. Superfund site cleanups are highly variable; costs can range from a few million to hundreds of millions of dollars depending on the type and extent of contamination, the chosen remediation technologies, and the site's geographic and geological characteristics. Given the contract's performance period extending to February 2027, the total value spread over approximately 7.5 years suggests a significant, long-term remediation effort. To provide a precise comparison, one would need data on the specific remediation activities (e.g., excavation, capping, groundwater treatment) and their associated unit costs for comparable sites managed by the EPA or DoD.
What are the primary risks associated with a long-term remediation contract like this?
Long-term remediation contracts, such as this one spanning from 2019 to 2027, carry several inherent risks. A primary risk is scope creep, where the initial scope of work expands due to unforeseen site conditions or evolving regulatory requirements, potentially leading to cost increases if not managed carefully under the contract's terms. Another risk is contractor performance; maintaining consistent quality and adherence to schedule over an extended period can be challenging. Economic risks, such as inflation impacting material and labor costs, can also affect the contractor's profitability and potentially lead to claims if the contract isn't structured to account for such fluctuations. Furthermore, technological obsolescence or the emergence of more effective remediation techniques during the contract's life could necessitate changes, adding complexity and cost.
What is HydroGeoLogic, Inc.'s track record with federal environmental remediation contracts?
HydroGeoLogic, Inc. (HGL) is a well-established environmental engineering and remediation firm that has a significant track record of performing work for various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They have been involved in numerous Superfund site cleanups and other environmental restoration projects across the United States. Their experience typically includes site investigation, risk assessment, remedial design, and construction/remediation services. Information on their past performance, including specific contract values, project outcomes, and any past performance issues or awards, can often be found in federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or through agency-specific contract award announcements. Generally, HGL is considered a major player in the federal environmental services market.
How does the firm fixed-price contract type influence contractor behavior and risk?
A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type places the primary risk of cost overruns on the contractor. This means that HydroGeoLogic, Inc. is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently, maintain productivity, and control quality to ensure profitability. For the government, an FFP contract offers the highest degree of cost certainty, as the final price is known upfront, barring any contract modifications. However, it can also lead contractors to be more conservative in their bidding, potentially inflating prices to account for unforeseen risks. It also means the government may not directly benefit from cost savings if the contractor performs more efficiently than anticipated, as the price remains fixed.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912DQ15R3003
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11107 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 400, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $44,267,885
Exercised Options: $32,313,084
Current Obligation: $32,313,084
Actual Outlays: $769,300
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $9,607,435
Contract Characteristics
Consolidated Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912DQ16D3002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-09-26
Current End Date: 2027-02-27
Potential End Date: 2027-02-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-11-25
More Contracts from Hydrogeologic, Inc.
- Racs II Region III Contract — $59.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- FY21 Norco HGL — $55.7M (Department of Defense)
- Remediation/Demolition of U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center (ccdc) and U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (mricd) Facilities Group 2 Facilities Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland — $49.9M (Department of Defense)
- Performance Based Remediation Services — $48.6M (Department of Defense)
- APG Remediation/Demolition Group 1 — $37.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)