DoD Spends $32.7M on Subscriber Equipment from Motorola Solutions, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,687,491 ($32.7M)

Contractor: Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-07-26

End Date: 2012-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,954 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT

Place of Performance

Location: COLUMBIA, HOWARD County, MARYLAND, 21046

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $32.7 million to MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT Key points: 1. Significant spending on subscriber equipment highlights reliance on a single vendor. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and limited innovation. 3. Long contract duration (1954 days) suggests a sustained need, but also a missed opportunity for competitive bidding. 4. The 'Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing' NAICS code provides broad context for the sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award amount is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the pricing is fair or reflects market value. Benchmarking against similar sole-source contracts would be necessary for a more definitive assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating no competition was sought or available. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition likely results in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitively bid contract.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying a premium for subscriber equipment due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long-term reliance on a single supplier could stifle technological advancements in communication equipment. The Department of Defense's procurement strategy for this essential equipment warrants further scrutiny.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this area is critical for defense operations, but competitive procurement is generally preferred to ensure value for money.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this sole-source contract. Future procurements should explore opportunities for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award suggests potential gaps in oversight regarding competitive sourcing. Further review of the justification for sole-sourcing is recommended.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-communications-equipment-manufactu, department-of-defense, md, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $32.7 million to MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.. SUBSCRIBER EQUIPMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-07-26. End: 2012-11-30.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and was it thoroughly vetted?

The provided data does not detail the justification for the sole-source award. A thorough review would involve examining documentation that proves only Motorola Solutions, Inc. could provide the required subscriber equipment, considering factors like unique capabilities, existing infrastructure compatibility, or urgent needs that precluded a competitive process.

How does the per-unit cost of this subscriber equipment compare to similar commercially available products or other government contracts?

Without specific per-unit cost data and comparable market benchmarks, a direct comparison is not possible. Given the sole-source nature, it is plausible that the pricing is higher than what might be achieved through competitive bidding. Further analysis would require access to detailed pricing information and market research.

What is the long-term strategy for acquiring subscriber equipment to ensure future cost-effectiveness and technological relevance?

The long-term strategy should prioritize competitive procurement for future acquisitions of subscriber equipment. This could involve market research to identify multiple potential vendors, breaking down requirements into smaller lots to encourage broader participation, and establishing clear performance metrics to drive innovation and cost savings.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommunications Equipment ManufacturingOther Communications Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ELECTRIC WIRE, POWER DISTRIB EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W912D107R0037

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7031 COLUMBIA GATEWAY DR 3RD FL, COLUMBIA, MD, 21046

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,107,743

Exercised Options: $32,687,491

Current Obligation: $32,687,491

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-07-26

Current End Date: 2012-11-30

Potential End Date: 2012-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-02-03

More Contracts from Motorola Solutions, Inc.

View all Motorola Solutions, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending