DoD Awards $22.5M Remediation Contract to Hydrogeologic, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,488,998 ($22.5M)
Contractor: Hydrogeologic, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2020-07-15
End Date: 2028-07-19
Contract Duration: 2,926 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FRONT RANGE OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: GREAT FALLS, CASCADE County, MONTANA, 59401
State: Montana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.5 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC. for work described as: FRONT RANGE OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value of $22.5M for remediation services. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of DoD. 3. Utilized full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 4. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating price certainty. 5. Duration spans over 8 years, from 2020 to 2028.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $22.5M for an 8-year remediation project appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental remediation contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive process was intended to find the best value. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for necessary remediation services.
Public Impact
Ensures environmental cleanup at a DoD facility. Long-term contract provides stability for remediation services. Potential for follow-on work or similar contracts in the sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 70 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited detail on specific remediation activities.
- Exclusion of sources in competition warrants further review.
- Long duration may introduce scope creep risks.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Significant investment in environmental remediation.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the environmental remediation sector, often involving complex cleanup operations. Spending in this area is driven by regulatory requirements and historical contamination at government facilities.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to assess small business participation in this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army is responsible for oversight. The contract's duration and fixed-price nature suggest a need for diligent performance monitoring to ensure objectives are met within budget.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to unforeseen site conditions.
- Risk of contractor performance issues over the long contract duration.
- Limited transparency on specific remediation tasks.
- Rationale for 'exclusion of sources' needs clarification.
Tags
remediation-services, department-of-defense, mt, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.5 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC.. FRONT RANGE OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2020-07-15. End: 2028-07-19.
What specific remediation activities are covered under this contract, and how do they align with the stated contract value?
The contract is for remediation services, but specific activities are not detailed in the provided data. A thorough review of the contract's statement of work would clarify the scope of work, including the types of contaminants, areas to be remediated, and methodologies employed. This would allow for a more accurate assessment of whether the $22.5M value is justified by the expected deliverables and complexity of the remediation tasks.
What was the rationale for 'exclusion of sources' within the full and open competition process, and did it impact the final price?
The 'exclusion of sources' clause within a full and open competition typically means that while the competition was open, certain pre-qualified or specific types of sources were considered, or perhaps some were excluded based on specific criteria. Understanding the exact reason for this exclusion is crucial. If it limited the pool of potential bidders significantly, it could have potentially reduced competitive pressure and impacted the final price discovery, possibly leading to a higher cost than if all potential sources were allowed.
How effectively will the firm fixed price contract manage risks associated with long-term environmental remediation projects?
A firm fixed price contract aims to transfer risk to the contractor, providing cost certainty for the government. However, long-term environmental remediation projects can be inherently unpredictable due to unforeseen site conditions or regulatory changes. While the FFP structure is beneficial for budget control, the contractor may price in contingencies for these uncertainties, potentially leading to a higher initial bid. Effective oversight is still critical to manage scope and ensure contractor performance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W9128F16R0008
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11107 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 400, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,734,446
Exercised Options: $22,488,998
Current Obligation: $22,488,998
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $34,542
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9128F19D0016
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2020-07-15
Current End Date: 2028-07-19
Potential End Date: 2028-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-07-11
More Contracts from Hydrogeologic, Inc.
- Racs II Region III Contract — $59.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- FY21 Norco HGL — $55.7M (Department of Defense)
- Remediation/Demolition of U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center (ccdc) and U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (mricd) Facilities Group 2 Facilities Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland — $49.9M (Department of Defense)
- Performance Based Remediation Services — $48.6M (Department of Defense)
- APG Remediation/Demolition Group 1 — $37.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)