DoD awards $47.5M for Building 703 Zamperini repair, highlighting construction sector activity
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $47,484,703 ($47.5M)
Contractor: NAN Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-09-30
End Date: 2026-12-08
Contract Duration: 1,530 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: REPAIR WORK, BUILDING 703 ZAMPERINI
Place of Performance
Location: MARSHALL ISLANDS
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $47.5 million to NAN INC for work described as: REPAIR WORK, BUILDING 703 ZAMPERINI Key points: 1. Contract value of $47.5M indicates significant investment in facility maintenance. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process for this construction project. 3. The definitive contract type with a firm fixed price offers cost certainty. 4. Project duration of 1530 days spans over four years, indicating a substantial scope of work. 5. The contract is managed by the Department of the Army, a key defense agency. 6. Location in the Marshall Islands may present unique logistical and operational challenges.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $47.5 million for building repair is substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction and repair projects within the Department of Defense would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm fixed-price structure generally provides good cost control for the government, assuming the scope was well-defined. The duration suggests a comprehensive approach to the repairs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With four bids received, the competition level appears moderate. This suggests that the agency sought a broad range of potential contractors, which can contribute to competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified firms.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and ensure the government receives the best value for its investment.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its personnel who will utilize the repaired Building 703. The services delivered include comprehensive repair work for a significant facility. The geographic impact is localized to the Marshall Islands, potentially involving local labor and resources. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for construction workers and specialized trades in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential logistical complexities and increased costs associated with performing construction in a remote island location like the Marshall Islands.
- Ensuring adequate oversight and quality control for a long-duration project in a geographically dispersed area.
- The firm fixed-price nature could lead to contractor claims if unforeseen issues arise during the extensive repair period.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides budget certainty for the government.
- The substantial contract value indicates a commitment to maintaining critical infrastructure.
- A duration of over four years allows for thorough planning and execution of complex repairs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. The Department of Defense is a significant client for construction services, often requiring specialized capabilities for facilities in diverse and sometimes challenging locations. Spending in this sector is influenced by infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and maintenance requirements across government agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem may be limited unless the prime contractor actively engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. The firm fixed-price nature and long duration necessitate robust monitoring of progress, quality, and adherence to the contract terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight details are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
- Military Construction
- Government Building Renovation
- Pacific Region Infrastructure Projects
Risk Flags
- Geographic isolation may increase logistical costs and complexity.
- Long project duration increases risk of unforeseen issues and market volatility.
- Firm fixed-price contract may be less flexible for unexpected repair challenges.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, construction, building-repair, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, marshall-islands, large-contract, infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $47.5 million to NAN INC. REPAIR WORK, BUILDING 703 ZAMPERINI
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NAN INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $47.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-09-30. End: 2026-12-08.
What is the historical spending pattern for Building 703 repair and maintenance by the Department of the Army?
Analyzing historical spending for Building 703 requires access to detailed procurement data beyond this single award. Typically, agencies maintain records of past contracts, including repair and maintenance activities, for specific facilities. A review of historical data would reveal if this $47.5 million award represents a significant increase or is in line with previous investments in the building. Factors such as the building's age, its operational criticality, and previous repair cycles would influence historical spending. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to contextualize this award relative to past expenditures, but the substantial amount suggests a major renovation or repair effort rather than routine maintenance.
How does the per-square-foot cost of this repair project compare to similar construction projects in the Marshall Islands or similar remote locations?
Determining the per-square-foot cost requires knowing the building's square footage, which is not provided in the data. However, construction projects in remote locations like the Marshall Islands often incur higher costs due to logistical challenges, transportation of materials and personnel, and potentially limited local labor availability. These factors can significantly increase the overall project cost compared to similar projects in more accessible areas. A detailed cost analysis would involve comparing the total contract value adjusted for scope against the building's size and then benchmarking this against known costs for construction or major repairs in comparable geographic and economic environments.
What specific repair or renovation activities are included in the $47.5 million contract for Building 703?
The provided data categorizes this award under 'REPAIR WORK, BUILDING 703 ZAMPERINI' and identifies the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code as 236220, which pertains to Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. While the contract type is 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT' with a 'FIRM FIXED PRICE,' the specific details of the repair or renovation activities are not itemized in the summary data. Such details would typically be found in the contract's statement of work (SOW) or specifications, outlining the scope of repairs, materials to be used, and performance standards required. Without the SOW, we can infer it involves substantial structural, mechanical, electrical, or architectural work necessary to restore or improve the building's condition.
What is the track record of NAN INC in performing large-scale construction contracts for the Department of Defense?
Information regarding NAN INC's specific track record with the Department of Defense for large-scale construction contracts is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance history, one would need to consult federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to review past awards, contract performance evaluations (CPARS), and any history of disputes or claims. A positive track record would include successful completion of similar projects on time and within budget, with favorable performance reviews. Conversely, a history of issues could raise concerns about their capacity to manage this significant $47.5 million project effectively, especially given its remote location and long duration.
What are the potential risks associated with the 1530-day duration of this contract?
A contract duration of 1530 days (approximately 4.2 years) for building repair presents several potential risks. Firstly, the extended timeline increases the likelihood of unforeseen conditions arising, such as discovering hidden structural damage or encountering hazardous materials, which could lead to cost overruns or delays, particularly with a firm fixed-price contract. Secondly, market fluctuations in material costs and labor availability over such a long period can impact the contractor's profitability and potentially affect project timelines. Thirdly, maintaining consistent government oversight and quality assurance over an extended duration requires sustained resources and attention. Finally, changes in military requirements or budget priorities could potentially impact the project's scope or continuation.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Solicitation ID: W9128A22R0013
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 636 LAUMAKA ST, HONOLULU, HI, 96819
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $47,484,703
Exercised Options: $47,484,703
Current Obligation: $47,484,703
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-09-30
Current End Date: 2026-12-08
Potential End Date: 2026-12-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-11-17
More Contracts from NAN Inc
- Mcon Project FY22 P956 Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) & FY23 P973 BEQ, Marine Corps Base Hawaii (mcbh), Kaneohe BAY, Hawaii — $174.5M (Department of Defense)
- Construction for RM19-0926 Repair Ammunition Wharves W3 and W1, Joint Base Pearl Harborhickam, Hawaii — $134.5M (Department of Defense)
- N62742-20-C-1315, FY20 Mcon P-911 Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Marine Corps Base Hawaii, Kaneohe, Hawaii — $123.5M (Department of Defense)
- FY11 Mcon P-005, Construct POW / MIA Accounting Command, Hickam AIR Force Base, Hawaii — $84.9M (Department of Defense)
- FY13 MCA PN76586 Quad B Building Renovation, Whole Barracks Renewal, Phase 2B, and FY13 MCA PN76587 Quad B Building Renovation, Whole Barracks Renewal, Phase 2C, Schofield Barracks, Oahu, Hawaii — $76.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)