Army awards $172M MCR South Jetty Rehabilitation contract to J. E. McAmis, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $171,948,714 ($171.9M)
Contractor: J. E. Mcamis, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-08-30
End Date: 2026-09-29
Contract Duration: 2,587 days
Daily Burn Rate: $66.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER, (MCR) SOUTH JETTY REHABILITATION
Place of Performance
Location: HAMMOND, CLATSOP County, OREGON, 97121
State: Oregon Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $171.9 million to J. E. MCAMIS, INC for work described as: MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER, (MCR) SOUTH JETTY REHABILITATION Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a firm-fixed-price definitive contract, providing cost certainty for the government. 3. Project duration is substantial at 2587 days, indicating a long-term infrastructure commitment. 4. The contract is for heavy and civil engineering construction, a critical sector for infrastructure. 5. The award represents a significant investment in coastal infrastructure maintenance and resilience.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $172 million for jetty rehabilitation is substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale civil engineering projects is difficult without specific scope details, but the firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government sought to control costs. The award to a single contractor implies a thorough evaluation of technical capabilities and pricing. Further analysis would require comparing the unit costs for specific construction elements against industry standards.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this significant infrastructure project. While two bidders is better than one, a higher number of bids could potentially lead to more aggressive pricing and better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to vie for the contract, potentially driving down costs through competitive pricing.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Defense, responsible for maintaining vital waterways. The project will deliver critical rehabilitation services to the South Jetty of the Mouth of the Columbia River. Geographic impact is focused on the Oregon coast, specifically the Columbia River estuary. The project will likely involve a significant workforce in the heavy and civil engineering construction sector in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long project duration could introduce risks related to material cost escalation and unforeseen site conditions.
- Reliance on a single contractor for a project of this magnitude warrants close monitoring of performance and adherence to schedule.
- The specific details of the rehabilitation scope are not provided, making it difficult to assess potential risks associated with complex engineering challenges.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty and limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.
- Award under full and open competition suggests a robust evaluation process and selection of a qualified contractor.
- The project addresses critical infrastructure needs, contributing to the long-term economic and environmental health of the region.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction sector, a vital part of the nation's infrastructure. This sector includes the construction of infrastructure projects such as highways, bridges, dams, and marine structures. The Mouth of the Columbia River jetty rehabilitation is a significant project within this domain, requiring specialized expertise in marine construction and coastal engineering. Comparable spending benchmarks for large-scale jetty or breakwater projects can vary widely based on location, complexity, and material requirements, but projects in the hundreds of millions of dollars are not uncommon for major coastal defense and navigation improvements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). The award was made under full and open competition. While there is no explicit small business set-aside, the prime contractor, J. E. McAmis, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill portions of the work. The extent of subcontracting to small businesses will be a key factor in assessing the contract's impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a component of the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which places a strong emphasis on the contractor meeting defined deliverables within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is typically facilitated through contract award announcements and potentially through public reporting on project milestones. The Inspector General for the Department of Defense would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Program
- Coastal Infrastructure Projects
- Navigation Channel Maintenance
- Port and Harbor Improvements
- Federal Infrastructure Investment
Risk Flags
- Long-term project duration may increase exposure to economic fluctuations and unforeseen environmental challenges.
- Single contractor award requires diligent oversight to ensure performance and adherence to contract terms.
- Scope of work details are limited, potentially masking complex engineering risks.
Tags
construction, heavy-civil-engineering, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, oregon, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, infrastructure, coastal-engineering, marine-construction, large-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $171.9 million to J. E. MCAMIS, INC. MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER, (MCR) SOUTH JETTY REHABILITATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is J. E. MCAMIS, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $171.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-08-30. End: 2026-09-29.
What is the track record of J. E. McAmis, Inc. with similar large-scale civil engineering projects, particularly those involving marine or jetty construction?
J. E. McAmis, Inc. has a history of undertaking significant civil engineering projects. While specific details on their past performance with jetty rehabilitation of this scale are not provided in the summary data, their experience in heavy civil construction suggests a capacity for such work. A deeper dive into their contract history with federal agencies, particularly the Army Corps of Engineers, would reveal their success rates, any past performance issues, and their expertise in marine environments. Reviewing past project close-outs, any litigation, and client satisfaction surveys would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability for this critical infrastructure project.
How does the awarded amount of $172 million compare to the estimated cost or budget for the MCR South Jetty Rehabilitation project?
The provided data lists the award amount at $172,194,871.03. However, it does not include information on the government's initial cost estimate or the appropriated budget for this project. Without this comparative data, it is difficult to definitively assess whether the contract was awarded at a price significantly above, below, or in line with expectations. The fact that it was awarded under full and open competition with two bids suggests that the pricing was deemed acceptable by the contracting officer, but a direct comparison to an internal government estimate would offer a clearer picture of the value achieved.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and risk mitigation strategies outlined in the contract for the MCR South Jetty Rehabilitation?
The summary data does not explicitly detail the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or specific risk mitigation strategies embedded within the contract. However, as a firm-fixed-price contract, the primary performance indicator is the successful completion of the jetty rehabilitation according to the specified technical requirements and within the agreed-upon timeline and budget. Risk mitigation is implicitly addressed through the contractor's obligation to deliver the project at a set price, incentivizing them to manage their own risks related to cost, schedule, and execution. The Army Corps of Engineers would likely have oversight mechanisms and contractual clauses to address potential risks such as unforeseen site conditions, environmental compliance, and quality control.
What is the historical spending pattern for jetty maintenance and rehabilitation at the Mouth of the Columbia River by the Army Corps of Engineers?
The provided data focuses on a single, large contract award. It does not offer historical spending patterns for jetty maintenance and rehabilitation at the Mouth of the Columbia River. To understand historical spending, one would need to access historical contract databases and budget allocations for the Army Corps of Engineers specifically for this location and type of work. Analyzing past contracts, their values, durations, and frequency would reveal trends in investment, identify periods of significant rehabilitation efforts, and potentially highlight any recurring issues that necessitate such substantial ongoing investment.
What are the potential long-term economic and environmental benefits expected from the MCR South Jetty Rehabilitation project?
The rehabilitation of the South Jetty at the Mouth of the Columbia River is crucial for maintaining navigation channels, which directly supports regional economic activity through maritime trade and commerce. A well-maintained jetty helps protect the coastline from erosion and storm damage, preserving coastal ecosystems and infrastructure. Environmentally, the jetty plays a role in managing water flow and sediment transport, impacting the health of the river estuary and associated habitats. The project's long-term benefits include ensuring continued safe passage for vessels, supporting local and regional economies reliant on river access, and contributing to coastal resilience against natural forces.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W9127N19R0007
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: HZE
Contractor Details
Address: 621 COUNTRY DR, CHICO, CA, 95928
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $176,437,104
Exercised Options: $171,948,714
Current Obligation: $171,948,714
Actual Outlays: $74,298,652
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-08-30
Current End Date: 2026-09-29
Potential End Date: 2026-09-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-02-12
More Contracts from J. E. Mcamis, Inc
- TAS::96 3134::TAS $25,743,802.00 TAS::96 8862::TAS $8,866,700.00 This Dredging Project Includes NEW Work for the Improvement of the Columbia River From River Mile 65+00 to River Mile 67+50 and River Mile 87+25 to River Mile 88+25. Disposal of NEW Work Material From River Mile 65+00 to River Mile 67+50 and River Mile 87+25 to River Mile 88+25 Will BE Located AT the Designated Upland Site, Cottonwood Island — $56.3M (Department of Defense)
- Kissimmee River Restoration Project, C-38 Reach 2 Backfill IS Comprised of the Demolition and Removal of the Existng Water Control Struction S-65C and Subsequent Backfill of Said Structure. Igf::ct::igf — $44.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mouth of the Columbia River North Jetty Rehabilitation — $38.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200306!000335!96ce!cw17 !USA Engineer Dist Jacksonville !dacw1703c0004 !A!N! !N! !20030226!20050411!060693512!060693512!060693512!N!J E Mcamis, Inc !3125 South Gate Lane !chico !ca!95928!54025!099!12!palm Beach !palm Beach !florida !+000000001000!n!n!000000000000!y219!other Conservation & Development Facilities !C2 !construction !5000!NOT Discernable or Classified !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!008!b! !D!N!C! ! !n!b!n!n! !B!C! !a!a!000!a!b!y!t!n! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $31.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200512!501445!96ce!w912ep!usa Engineer Dist Jacksonville !w912ep05c0043 !A!N! !N! ! !20050930!20070329!060693512!060693512!060693512!N!J E Mcamis, Inc !621 Country DR !chico !ca!95928!99099!099!12!palm Beach !palm Beach !florida !+000000040000!n!n!000019733220!y211!dams !C2 !construction !000 !* !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!004!b! !D!N!C! ! !n!b!n!y! !B!C! !a!d!010!a!b!y!t!n! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $20.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)