Department of Defense awards $90.3M construction contract to Clark Construction Group, LLC for MacDill AFB facilities
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $90,339,215 ($90.3M)
Contractor: Clark Construction Group, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-04-17
End Date: 2011-05-14
Contract Duration: 1,853 days
Daily Burn Rate: $48.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200608!601692!2100!W91278!USA ENGINEER DIST MOBILE !W9127806C0028 !A!N! !N! ! !20060417!20080514!964628564!066767021!064862345!N!CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC !2502 N ROCKY POINTE DR STE!TAMPA !FL!33607!42025!057!12!MACDILL AFB !HILLSBOROUGH !FLORIDA !+000057399240!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!004!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!B!Y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33608
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $90.3 million to CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC for work described as: 200608!601692!2100!W91278!USA ENGINEER DIST MOBILE !W9127806C0028 !A!N! !N! ! !20060417!20080514!964628564!066767021!064862345!N!CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC !2502 N ROCKY POINTE DR STE!TAMPA !FL!33607!42025!057!12!MACDILL AFB !HILL… Key points: 1. Contract value of $90.3M represents a significant investment in military infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of over 1800 days indicates a large-scale, long-term project. 4. Awarded to a single contractor, Clark Construction Group, LLC, highlighting their capacity for major projects. 5. The project falls under the 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' NAICS code, indicating a focus on facility development. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a specific military need.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $90.3 million for construction services at MacDill AFB appears reasonable given the project's scale and duration. While specific benchmarks for similar projects at military installations are not provided, the award to a single, established contractor like Clark Construction Group, LLC suggests a competitive process that likely yielded a fair price. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract shifts risk to the contractor, which can be beneficial for the government if managed effectively.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This suggests a robust bidding process where multiple contractors likely vied for the opportunity. The presence of four bidders, as indicated by the data, points to a healthy level of competition, which generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this substantial contract helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging the submission of the best value proposals.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the personnel at MacDill Air Force Base, who will receive improved or new facilities. The contract will deliver construction services for miscellaneous buildings, enhancing the operational capabilities and living/working conditions at the base. The geographic impact is localized to MacDill AFB in Florida, supporting regional economic activity through construction jobs and material procurement. The project will likely create numerous jobs in the construction sector, benefiting skilled trades and related support industries in the Tampa Bay area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if project scope expands beyond initial fixed-price agreement.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a large, long-duration project could pose risks if performance issues arise.
- Limited visibility into the specific types of 'other miscellaneous buildings' being constructed without further detail.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type generally provides cost certainty for the government.
- Contractor, Clark Construction Group, LLC, is a large and experienced firm likely capable of managing complex projects.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The U.S. construction market is vast, with federal contracts representing a significant portion. This award to Clark Construction Group, LLC, a major player in the industry, aligns with typical federal procurement practices for large-scale infrastructure projects. Benchmarking against similar military base construction projects would provide further context on value.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Given the large contract value and the nature of the work, it is possible that subcontracting opportunities may exist for specialized trades, but this is not detailed in the provided information. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which is responsible for managing construction projects. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified work within budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may not always be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction Projects
- Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) related construction
- Federal Building and Facilities Construction
- Department of Defense Infrastructure Projects
Risk Flags
- Contract Duration
- Single Contractor Award
- Potential for Cost Overruns (inherent in large projects)
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, macdill-afb, florida, firm-fixed-price, definitive-contract, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, large-contract-value, military-infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $90.3 million to CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC. 200608!601692!2100!W91278!USA ENGINEER DIST MOBILE !W9127806C0028 !A!N! !N! ! !20060417!20080514!964628564!066767021!064862345!N!CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC !2502 N ROCKY POINTE DR STE!TAMPA !FL!33607!42025!057!12!MACDILL AFB !HILLSBOROUGH !FLORIDA !+000057399240!N!N!000000000000!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $90.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-04-17. End: 2011-05-14.
What is the track record of Clark Construction Group, LLC with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense?
Clark Construction Group, LLC is a well-established and large-scale construction firm with a significant history of performing federal contracts. They have undertaken numerous projects for various government agencies, including the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and the General Services Administration. Their portfolio often includes complex projects such as military facilities, federal courthouses, and research laboratories. While specific performance metrics for past DoD contracts are not detailed here, their continued success in securing large federal awards suggests a generally positive track record and capability to meet government requirements. Further investigation into past performance evaluations and any reported disputes or claims would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their federal contracting history.
How does the awarded amount of $90.3 million compare to similar construction projects at military installations?
The awarded amount of $90.3 million for construction services at MacDill AFB is substantial, reflecting a significant infrastructure development or upgrade. To benchmark this value effectively, one would need to compare it against similar projects in terms of scope (e.g., type of buildings, square footage), complexity, and location. For instance, comparing it to other 'other miscellaneous buildings' construction contracts awarded by the Army Corps of Engineers at other bases of similar size and operational tempo would be relevant. Without access to a detailed breakdown of the project's specific requirements and deliverables, a precise comparison is difficult. However, given the firm fixed-price nature and the competitive award, it suggests the government sought to secure this scope of work at a determined price point.
What are the primary risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract of this magnitude and duration?
The primary risk associated with a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract of this magnitude ($90.3M) and duration (over 1800 days) is the potential for the contractor to incur significant losses if costs escalate beyond their projections. While FFP shifts cost risk to the contractor, it can also incentivize them to cut corners on quality or safety if not adequately monitored. For the government, the risk lies in potential contractor default or disputes if unforeseen issues arise that significantly impact costs or schedule, potentially leading to delays and the need for contract modifications or re-competition. Effective government oversight is crucial to mitigate these risks by ensuring adherence to specifications and quality standards throughout the project lifecycle.
What is the significance of the NAICS code 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction) in understanding this contract?
The NAICS code 236220, 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction,' is significant because it categorizes the type of construction services being procured. This code encompasses establishments primarily responsible for the construction or remodeling of non-residential buildings such as commercial, industrial, or institutional structures. For this contract, it indicates that the project involves the building of facilities that are not primarily for housing or manufacturing, but rather for operational, administrative, or support functions at MacDill AFB. Understanding this classification helps in identifying comparable projects and assessing the contractor's specialization within the broader construction industry.
How does the number of bidders (4) influence the potential value for taxpayers on this contract?
Having four bidders for this contract is a positive indicator for taxpayer value. A higher number of bidders generally leads to increased competition, which pressures contractors to submit more competitive pricing and offer better value to secure the award. With four distinct proposals, the Department of the Army had a reasonable pool from which to select the best overall value, likely balancing price, technical approach, and past performance. This level of competition helps ensure that the government is not overpaying for the construction services and that taxpayer funds are being utilized efficiently.
What are the potential implications of awarding a large construction contract to a single entity like Clark Construction Group, LLC?
Awarding a large construction contract like this to a single entity, Clark Construction Group, LLC, implies that they possess the necessary scale, expertise, and financial capacity to undertake such a significant project. This can lead to streamlined project management and communication, as there is one primary point of contact and responsibility. However, it also concentrates risk; if the contractor underperforms, faces financial difficulties, or encounters unforeseen challenges, the entire project could be jeopardized. The government's due diligence in selecting a capable contractor and robust oversight are critical to mitigating these risks and ensuring successful project completion.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Clark Enterprises, Inc. (UEI: 064862345)
Address: 2502 N ROCKY POINTE DR STE, TAMPA, FL, 33607
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-04-17
Current End Date: 2011-05-14
Potential End Date: 2011-05-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-25
More Contracts from Clark Construction Group, LLC
- ECB2 Construction Project Igf::ot::igf — $727.7M (Department of Defense)
- TAS::47 4543::TAS Recovery: Award of Arra Funds for Design/Build of US Coast Guard Headquarters Building, ST Elizabeths West Campus, Wash., DC — $652.2M (General Services Administration)
- Design-Build Construction of the Veterans Affairs Health Care Center, EL Paso, TX — $617.1M (Department of Defense)
- IRA: Provide Labor, Materials, Supervision, and Equipment to Construct the NEW Cisa HQ Building. Services Include, BUT ARE NOT Limited: Civil and Site Work Consisting of Heavy Earth Work, Etc.excavation, Stabilization of Existing Slope, Foundations — $569.7M (General Services Administration)
- P-114, SET 2, Medical Center Addition/Alteration (mcaa), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (wrnmmc), Naval Support Activity Bethesda, Bethesda, MD — $482.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)