DoD's $24.5M Cox Construction Contract Awarded Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,499,248 ($24.5M)
Contractor: COX Construction CO
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-03-28
End Date: 2009-02-27
Contract Duration: 1,067 days
Daily Burn Rate: $23.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED
Sector: Construction
Place of Performance
Location: PHOENIX, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85012
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.5 million to COX CONSTRUCTION CO for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Cox Construction Co. for $24.5 million. 2. The contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the DoD. 4. The contract duration was 1067 days. 5. No small business participation was reported.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $24.5 million for commercial and institutional building construction is difficult to benchmark without specific project details. However, the bid range of $2.3 million suggests potential for significant price variation among bidders.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad solicitation for bids. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of contractors to participate.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is intended to secure the best value for taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs.
Public Impact
Construction services for government facilities are essential for maintaining infrastructure. The award supports the Department of the Army's operational capabilities. The lack of small business participation may limit opportunities for smaller firms in this sector. The contract's duration suggests a significant construction project.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- No small business participation reported
- Long contract duration may indicate complex project or potential for cost overruns
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition
- Awarded by a major federal agency (DoD)
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broad Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector by the federal government is substantial, supporting a wide range of infrastructure projects across various agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that no small business participation was reported for this contract. This suggests that the prime contractor, Cox Construction Co., did not subcontract to small businesses or that such participation was not tracked or reported.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, through its various branches like the Department of the Army, has established oversight mechanisms for contract awards. However, the effectiveness of oversight in ensuring optimal value and adherence to regulations can vary.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of reported small business participation
- Significant difference between lowest bid and award amount
- Long contract duration may indicate potential for scope creep or delays
- Limited detail on specific construction services procured
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, az, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.5 million to COX CONSTRUCTION CO. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is COX CONSTRUCTION CO.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-03-28. End: 2009-02-27.
What specific construction services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's mission requirements?
The contract was for Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a broad category. Without further details, it's challenging to pinpoint the exact services. These could range from new building construction to renovations or maintenance of existing facilities critical for the Army's operational readiness and administrative functions.
Given the $2.3 million bid range, how effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the government received competitive pricing for this $24.5 million contract?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize price discovery. The $2.3 million bid range relative to the $24.5 million award suggests a significant spread, implying that while competition existed, the final price was substantially higher than the lowest bid, warranting scrutiny into the evaluation criteria and justification for the award price.
What is the potential long-term impact of awarding such a large construction contract without reported small business participation on the small business industrial base supporting federal constructio
The absence of reported small business participation could indicate missed opportunities for smaller firms to gain experience and revenue on federal projects. This can potentially hinder the growth and capacity of the small business construction sector, which is often crucial for specialized services and local economic development.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3170 SCOTT ST, VISTA, CA, 49
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-03-28
Current End Date: 2009-02-27
Potential End Date: 2009-02-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-09-24
More Contracts from COX Construction CO
- NEW Construction, SQ OPS and AMU Beale AFB — $36.3M (Department of Defense)
- Construction of a NEW 800 Member Army Reserve Center (ARC) Located in Fallbrook, CA — $34.6M (Department of Defense)
- Construct an Unmanned Aircarft Systems Hangar AT FT Irwin. Work Includes Operations and Maintenance Hangar With Shops, Company Administration, Aircraft Container Storage, Organizational Vehicle Parking. Work Also Includes Asphalt Overaly of Existing Runway, Taiway, and Access Aparon — $33.2M (Department of Defense)
- Nogales Central Processing Center, AZ Construction — $33.0M (General Services Administration)
- Construction of Afrc AT Moreno Valley, CA — $31.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)