DoD Awards $13.3M Construction Contract to W. G. Yates & Sons for Eagle Pass Facility
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,342,730 ($13.3M)
Contractor: W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-02-18
End Date: 2008-08-04
Contract Duration: 1,263 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200512!500835!2100!W9126G!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT FORT WORTH!W9126G05C0007 !A!N! !N! ! !20050218!20060531!004032132!004032132!017041232!N!W G YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION!ONE GULLY AVENUE !PHILADELPHIA !MS!39350!21892!323!48!EAGLE PASS !MAVERICK !TEXAS !+000011862500!N!N!000000001186!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!006!B! !D!N!C! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !D!D!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: EAGLE PASS, MAVERICK County, TEXAS, 78852
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.3 million to W. G. YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: 200512!500835!2100!W9126G!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT FORT WORTH!W9126G05C0007 !A!N! !N! ! !20050218!20060531!004032132!004032132!017041232!N!W G YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION!ONE GULLY AVENUE !PHILADELPHIA !MS!39350!21892!323!48!EAGLE PASS !MAVE… Key points: 1. The contract is for miscellaneous building construction, a common need for military installations. 2. W. G. Yates & Sons Construction, a large firm, secured this award. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is Construction, specifically commercial and institutional building construction.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.3 million for construction services appears within a reasonable range for a project of this nature, though specific benchmarks for 'miscellaneous buildings' are not readily available. Without more detailed project scope, a precise comparison is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives fair value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, with the lowest responsible bidder likely selected.
Public Impact
Local construction firms may have had opportunities to bid on this project. The project contributes to the infrastructure supporting military operations in Texas. Job creation in the construction sector is a potential positive impact.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the 'miscellaneous buildings' scope.
- Potential for cost overruns in fixed-price contracts if unforeseen issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Contract awarded to a known construction company.
- Project supports military infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
The construction sector is vital for maintaining and expanding government facilities. This contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction, a broad category encompassing various building types. Benchmarks for such projects vary widely based on scope and location.
Small Business Impact
While the award was made under full and open competition, there is no specific indication that small businesses were prime contractors or significant subcontractors on this particular award. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army awarded this contract, implying oversight from the Department of Defense. The use of a definitive contract suggests a structured process, but specific oversight mechanisms for this project are not detailed.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Vague contract description ('OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS').
- Fixed-price contract type can pose risks if unforeseen issues arise.
- Limited information on specific performance metrics or quality control.
- No clear indication of small business subcontracting goals or achievements.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, tx, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.3 million to W. G. YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. 200512!500835!2100!W9126G!USA ENGINEER DISTRICT FORT WORTH!W9126G05C0007 !A!N! !N! ! !20050218!20060531!004032132!004032132!017041232!N!W G YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION!ONE GULLY AVENUE !PHILADELPHIA !MS!39350!21892!323!48!EAGLE PASS !MAVERICK !TEXAS !+000011862500!N!N!000000001186!Y199!OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !236220!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is W. G. YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-02-18. End: 2008-08-04.
What is the specific scope of 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS' and how does it align with the needs of the USA Engineer District Fort Worth?
The term 'OTHER MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS' is very broad and lacks specificity. It could encompass anything from storage facilities to administrative offices or specialized structures. Understanding the exact nature of these buildings is crucial to assess if the contract's scope adequately addresses the district's operational requirements and if the $13.3 million price tag is justified for the intended purpose.
What were the key factors that led to W. G. Yates & Sons Construction being selected as the winning bidder under full and open competition?
Under full and open competition, the selection of W. G. Yates & Sons Construction likely resulted from a combination of factors including their bid price, technical qualifications, past performance, and adherence to contract requirements. The government evaluates these elements to ensure the best value is obtained. Without the specific evaluation criteria and scores, the precise weighting of each factor remains unknown.
How effectively does this contract contribute to the overall mission readiness and infrastructure needs of the Department of Defense in the specified region?
The effectiveness of this contract hinges on the successful completion of the 'miscellaneous buildings' as per the contract's specifications and timeline. If the completed structures meet the intended operational needs for the USA Engineer District Fort Worth, it contributes positively to mission readiness and infrastructure. However, without knowing the specific purpose of these buildings, a definitive assessment of their contribution is challenging.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: THE Yates Companies Inc (UEI: 017041232)
Address: ONE GULLY AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, MS, 39350
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $127,363
Exercised Options: $127,363
Current Obligation: $13,342,730
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-02-18
Current End Date: 2008-08-04
Potential End Date: 2008-08-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-25
More Contracts from W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company
- THE Armed Forces Retirement Home (afrh) HAS a Requirement to Procure a Firm Fixed-Price Design Build Service Contract to Demolish and Construction of the NEW Armed Forces Retirement Home in Gulfport,MS. the Remediation and Demolition of the AIR Force Retirement Home IS Necessary to BE Cleared From the Site in Order to Construct the NEW AIR Force Retirement Home — $205.7M (General Services Administration)
- Preconstruction Services Phase of NEW U.S. Courthouse, Jackson, MS — $136.1M (General Services Administration)
- Mobile, Alabama- Design and Construction of a NEW 155,000 Gross Square Foot Federal Courthouse and the Repair and Alternation of the Historic John Campbell Courthouse in Mobile, Alabma — $114.3M (General Services Administration)
- Powertrain Phase IV, Engine Assembly Facility Ccad, NAS Corpus Christi, TX — $103.8M (Department of Defense)
- Basic Price for Item 0001 — $103.0M (Department of Defense)
View all W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)