DoD's $14.6M consulting contract with CACI NSS, LLC for administrative management services awarded in 2008
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,635,848 ($14.6M)
Contractor: CACI NSS, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-10-04
End Date: 2010-11-03
Contract Duration: 760 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: LABOR - MONTH 6
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20310
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.6 million to CACI NSS, LLC for work described as: LABOR - MONTH 6 Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad market search. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. Performance period spanned over two years, indicating a substantial engagement. 4. The contract was awarded to CACI NSS, LLC, a known entity in government contracting. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to general management consulting services. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DoD. 7. The contract was awarded in Washington D.C., indicating a concentration of federal activity.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed service descriptions and performance metrics. The total award amount of $14.6 million over approximately two years suggests a moderate annual spend for consulting services. However, without comparable contracts for similar administrative management and general management consulting services within the Department of the Army during that period, it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing was competitive or represented good value for money. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract is a positive indicator for cost control, as it caps the government's expenditure.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that the Department of the Army solicited proposals from all responsible sources. This approach typically involves a broad outreach to the market, allowing for a wide range of potential contractors to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests that the Army aimed to maximize competition to achieve the best possible pricing and service offerings. This method is generally preferred for ensuring fair market access and potentially driving down costs through competitive pressure.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services, as contractors vie to win the award.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Army, receiving administrative management and general management consulting services. These services likely supported internal operations, process improvements, or strategic planning within the Army. The geographic impact is concentrated in Washington D.C., where the contract was administered. The contract supported the federal workforce by engaging a contractor to provide specialized expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and impact of the consulting services provided.
- The raw dollar amount does not provide insight into the efficiency or value-for-money achieved by the contractor.
- Without details on the scope of work, it's hard to determine if the contract addressed critical needs or was a discretionary spend.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market search and potential for competitive pricing.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage costs by capping the government's expenditure.
- The contractor, CACI NSS, LLC, is an established entity in the federal contracting space, implying a degree of experience and capability.
Sector Analysis
Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a broad category within the professional services sector. This sector is characterized by a mix of large, established firms and smaller specialized consultancies. Federal agencies frequently procure these services to enhance operational efficiency, implement new strategies, and manage complex projects. Spending in this area can fluctuate based on agency priorities and budget allocations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other contracts for similar consulting services awarded to various federal agencies during the same time period.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'sb': false. The award to CACI NSS, LLC, a large business, suggests that small business subcontracting opportunities may have been limited unless specifically mandated or pursued by the prime contractor. Without explicit subcontracting plans or goals detailed in the award data, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, though large prime contracts often include provisions for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. As a Firm Fixed Price contract, oversight would focus on ensuring the contractor met the defined scope of work and deliverables. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which provide basic award information. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arose during the contract's performance.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Consulting Services
- Administrative Management Services
- General Management Consulting Services
- Army Consulting Contracts
- Professional Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Limited information on competition specifics (number of bidders).
- Absence of specific deliverables or KPIs in summary data.
- Potential for scope creep in consulting engagements.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, administrative-management-consulting, general-management-consulting, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, professional-services, washington-dc, caci-nss-llc, naics-541611, large-business
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.6 million to CACI NSS, LLC. LABOR - MONTH 6
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CACI NSS, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-10-04. End: 2010-11-03.
What was the specific scope of work for CACI NSS, LLC under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611). However, the specific scope of work is not detailed. Typically, such contracts could involve areas like organizational analysis, process improvement, strategic planning support, human capital management consulting, or financial management consulting. Without a detailed statement of work (SOW) or contract line item numbers (CLINs), it's impossible to ascertain the precise services rendered. The Department of the Army would have defined these requirements based on their operational needs at the time of procurement.
How does the $14.6 million award compare to other similar consulting contracts awarded by the Department of the Army around 2008-2010?
Comparing this $14.6 million award requires access to historical contract databases and filtering for similar service codes (NAICS 541611) and agencies (Department of the Army) within the 2008-2010 timeframe. General management consulting services can vary significantly in price based on the complexity of the problem, the duration of the engagement, and the level of expertise required. A $14.6 million contract over approximately two years averages around $7.3 million per year. This figure would need to be benchmarked against other contracts of similar scope and duration to determine if it was within the expected range for the period. Without such comparative data, assessing its relative value is speculative.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected from CACI NSS, LLC?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this contract. For a Firm Fixed Price contract, the primary expectation is that the contractor fulfills the agreed-upon scope of work within the specified timeline and budget. Performance would likely be assessed based on the successful completion of defined tasks, reports, analyses, or recommendations as outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). The absence of explicit KPIs in the summary data suggests that performance monitoring might have been based on more qualitative assessments or adherence to contractual milestones rather than quantifiable metrics.
What is CACI NSS, LLC's track record with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies?
CACI NSS, LLC is a subsidiary of CACI International Inc., a well-established government contractor with a significant presence across various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense (DoD). CACI International has a long history of providing a wide range of services, including IT, intelligence, and mission support. CACI NSS, LLC, specifically, has been involved in numerous contracts, often related to IT, engineering, and professional services. A review of federal procurement databases would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance, including award history, contract values, and agency clients, providing a basis for assessing their experience and reliability.
Were there any notable risks or challenges associated with this contract during its performance period?
The provided data does not highlight any specific risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, general risks associated with consulting contracts can include scope creep, contractor performance issues, budget overruns (though mitigated by FFP), or changes in agency requirements. The Firm Fixed Price nature of this contract shifts significant cost risk to the contractor. Without post-award performance reviews or contract modification data, it's difficult to identify any unique challenges that may have arisen for this particular engagement.
How has federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services evolved since this contract was awarded?
Federal spending on administrative management and general management consulting services has generally seen fluctuations influenced by budget cycles, national priorities, and shifts towards different contracting vehicles (e.g., GSA schedules, task orders under IDIQs). Post-2010, there has been a continued demand for these services across agencies, often focusing on areas like digital transformation, cybersecurity consulting, process optimization, and strategic planning. While specific dollar amounts vary annually, the need for external expertise in management and administration remains a consistent requirement for federal agencies seeking to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)
Address: 11955 FREEDOM DR STE 10000, RESTON, VA, 11
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,635,848
Exercised Options: $14,635,848
Current Obligation: $14,635,848
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0188M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-10-04
Current End Date: 2010-11-03
Potential End Date: 2010-11-03 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-04-03
More Contracts from CACI NSS, LLC
- Special Operations Forces Emerging Threats Operations and Planning Support — $730.3M (General Services Administration)
- Consolidated AIR Force Satellite Control Network Maintenance, Modifications and Operations Contract — $600.7M (Department of Defense)
- Full-Spectrum Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (isr)innovation and Integration (F3I-2) — $578.4M (Department of Defense)
- ,Ct::igf the Purpose of This to IS to Acquire Performance-Based Information Technology (IT) Technical Support Services Associated With Army Projects, Programs, Applications, and Infrastructure Services in Support of the Project Directorate (PD) Reserve Component Automation Systems (rcas), the Army National Guard (arng) Distance Learning Project (DLP) Programs and Infrastructure Services to Support the PD Rcas, Programs, and Services to Support the PD Rcas, and Development, Sustainment, and Fielding of Information Management Systems (IMS) Projects, Military IT Infrastructure Projects (itii&r), Programs, Applications, Architecture in Support of the Arng — $424.4M (General Services Administration)
- Dtra Imax DA — $401.6M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)