DoD Awards $23.8M for Fort Irwin Natural Resources Conservation Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,808,433 ($23.8M)

Contractor: Johnson Controls Government Systems, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-04-26

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 7,827 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200607!603381!2100!W9124B!ACA, FORT IRWIN !DEAM3697EE73568!C!N! !N!W9124B05FZE01!P00001!20060426!20070430!076020440!076020440!006092860!N!JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SY!507 E MICHIGAN ST !MILWAUKEE !WI!53202!25114!071!06!FORT IRWIN !SAN BERNARDINO !CALIFORNIA!+000000711855!N!N!000000000000!F099!OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541690!E! !4! ! !D! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A! !J! !001!A! !C! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! !A!Z!A!A!000! !A!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT IRWIN, SAN BERNARDINO County, CALIFORNIA, 92310

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.8 million to JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: 200607!603381!2100!W9124B!ACA, FORT IRWIN !DEAM3697EE73568!C!N! !N!W9124B05FZE01!P00001!20060426!20070430!076020440!076020440!006092860!N!JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SY!507 E MICHIGAN ST !MILWAUKEE !WI!53202!25114!071!06!FORT IRWIN !SAN … Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $23.8 million for conservation services. 2. Competition type is 'Full and Open', suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk appears moderate given the fixed-price contract type and established vendor. 4. Sector focus is on Natural Resources & Conservation Services, supporting military infrastructure.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $23.8 million is substantial for conservation services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental service contracts would be necessary for a precise comparison, but the value seems aligned with major infrastructure support projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is expected to yield fair market value, ensuring taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential conservation services.

Public Impact

Ensures environmental sustainability and compliance at a major military installation. Supports the operational readiness of Fort Irwin by maintaining natural resources. Provides long-term conservation planning and execution for the California region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration is long (over 20 years), potentially leading to scope creep or price escalation if not managed closely.
Vendor concentration: Only one vendor listed, though competition was full and open.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Focus on essential natural resource conservation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the 'Other Natural Resources & Conservation Services' sector, specifically NAICS code 541690. Spending in this area supports environmental management and sustainability, often linked to government infrastructure and land use.

Small Business Impact

While the contract was awarded under full and open competition, there is no specific indication of small business participation or subcontracting goals mentioned in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's long duration and significant value warrant ongoing oversight to ensure performance standards are met and costs remain justified. Regular performance reviews and audits would be crucial.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration (over 20 years) increases risk of cost escalation and performance drift.
Potential for vendor lock-in despite initial competition.
Scope definition and management are critical due to the extended timeline.
Need for continuous government oversight to ensure value and compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.8 million to JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS, LLC. 200607!603381!2100!W9124B!ACA, FORT IRWIN !DEAM3697EE73568!C!N! !N!W9124B05FZE01!P00001!20060426!20070430!076020440!076020440!006092860!N!JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SY!507 E MICHIGAN ST !MILWAUKEE !WI!53202!25114!071!06!FORT IRWIN !SAN BERNARDINO !CALIFORNIA!+000000711855!N!N!000000000000!F099!OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES & CONSERVATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541690!E! !4! ! !D! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-04-26. End: 2026-09-30.

What specific conservation services are included in this contract, and how do they align with Fort Irwin's operational needs?

The contract specifies 'Other Natural Resources & Conservation Services' (NAICS 541690). This likely encompasses a broad range of activities such as wildlife management, habitat restoration, water resource management, invasive species control, and environmental compliance monitoring. These services are crucial for maintaining the ecological balance of the training grounds and surrounding areas, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations, and supporting the long-term sustainability of military operations at Fort Irwin.

Given the long contract duration, what mechanisms are in place to mitigate potential cost increases or performance degradation over time?

The contract is a firm fixed-price type, which inherently limits cost increases for the government. However, the extended period (over 20 years) necessitates robust performance management. Mechanisms likely include periodic performance reviews, clear deliverable milestones, and potential contract modifications for scope changes. The government should actively monitor vendor performance and adherence to the original scope to prevent scope creep and ensure continued value.

How does the $23.8 million award compare to typical spending for similar conservation services at large military installations?

A direct comparison requires detailed benchmarking against contracts for similar services at comparable military installations. However, $23.8 million over a 20+ year period suggests an average annual spend of roughly $1 million. This figure appears reasonable for comprehensive, long-term natural resource management at a large training facility like Fort Irwin, considering the complexity of ecological systems and regulatory requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVERVAT SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 21

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 507 E. MICHIGAN STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI, 53201

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $60,953

Exercised Options: $60,953

Current Obligation: $23,808,433

Actual Outlays: $1,108,353

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DEAM3697EE73568

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline