Department of the Army awards $13.9M for environmental remediation services, with a 3-year period of performance
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,959,751 ($14.0M)
Contractor: Kemron Environmental Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-04-29
End Date: 2012-05-30
Contract Duration: 2,953 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200407!000132!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!GS00F0046M !C!N! !Y!W911S004F0017! !20040429!20090930!082785585!082785585!082785585!N!KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,!8150 LEESBURG PIKE, SUITE !VIENNA !VA!22182!61068!099!06!RIVERBANK !STANISLAUS !CALIFORNIA!+000000897483!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !562910!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!E!N! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: DANVERS, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01923
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.0 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200407!000132!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!GS00F0046M !C!N! !Y!W911S004F0017! !20040429!20090930!082785585!082785585!082785585!N!KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,!8150 LEESBURG PIKE, SUITE !VIENNA !VA!22182!61068!099!06!RIVERBANK !STANISLAUS !CALIFORNIA!+000000897483… Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. The contract value of $13.9M over approximately 8 years indicates a moderate annual spend. 3. The primary contractor, KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., is responsible for delivering remediation services. 4. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle. 5. The services provided fall under the 'Other Professional Services' category, specifically remediation. 6. The contract was awarded in 2004, with a significant period of performance extending to 2012.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award amount of $13.9M over roughly 8 years suggests an average annual spend of approximately $1.7M. Without specific benchmarks for similar environmental remediation contracts of this scope and duration, it's challenging to definitively assess value for money. However, the use of full and open competition implies that pricing was likely scrutinized against market rates. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts risk to the contractor and can provide cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition' procurement, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The extensive period of performance suggests that the initial competition was robust enough to meet long-term needs.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through competitive bidding and encourages a wider range of contractors to offer their services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army, which receives essential environmental remediation services. The services delivered are focused on environmental cleanup and restoration, likely at military installations. The geographic impact is specified as Riverbank, Stanislaus, California, indicating a localized but critical environmental project. Workforce implications would include employment opportunities for environmental scientists, engineers, and technicians involved in remediation efforts.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The long performance period (2004-2012) could present challenges in adapting to evolving environmental regulations or technologies.
- Reliance on a single delivery order under a larger contract vehicle might limit flexibility if needs change significantly.
- The specific nature of environmental remediation can involve unforeseen complexities and cost overruns, even with fixed-price contracts.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive and potentially cost-effective process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract addresses critical environmental needs, contributing to regulatory compliance and site restoration.
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation services are a critical component of the broader professional services sector, supporting government agencies in managing environmental liabilities and complying with regulations. The market for these services is driven by federal and state environmental laws, as well as the need for cleanup at industrial sites and military installations. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more specific details on the scope of remediation, but contracts of this nature can range from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars depending on complexity and scale.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., is likely a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this specific delivery order. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may be limited unless they are part of the larger contract vehicle's subcontracting plan or are directly subcontracted by KEMRON.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting command. The contract's performance would be monitored to ensure compliance with the statement of work, delivery schedules, and quality standards. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which record award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's performance.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Professional Services Contracts
- Department of Defense Contracts
- Army Corps of Engineers Contracts
- Superfund Site Remediation
Risk Flags
- Potential for unforeseen environmental conditions impacting cost and schedule.
- Risk of evolving environmental regulations requiring contract modifications.
- Contractor performance risk over a long period of performance.
- Dependency on a single delivery order under a larger contract vehicle.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, environmental-remediation, professional-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, california, large-business, remediation-services, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.0 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.. 200407!000132!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!GS00F0046M !C!N! !Y!W911S004F0017! !20040429!20090930!082785585!082785585!082785585!N!KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,!8150 LEESBURG PIKE, SUITE !VIENNA !VA!22182!61068!099!06!RIVERBANK !STANISLAUS !CALIFORNIA!+000000897483!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !562910!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!E!N! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-04-29. End: 2012-05-30.
What is the track record of KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. with federal contracts, particularly for environmental remediation?
KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to environmental remediation. Reviewing their contract history in federal databases like FPDS can reveal the types of services they have provided, the agencies they have served, and the total value of contracts awarded to them. This analysis would help assess their experience, past performance, and capacity to handle complex environmental projects. For instance, examining past performance evaluations (if available) and the number and size of previous contracts can indicate their reliability and expertise in the field. Understanding their performance on similar projects, such as those involving hazardous waste removal or site cleanup, is crucial for evaluating their suitability for this specific contract.
How does the awarded amount of $13.9M compare to the typical cost of similar environmental remediation projects for the Department of the Army?
Benchmarking the $13.9M award against similar environmental remediation projects for the Department of the Army requires detailed analysis of contract scope, complexity, and duration. Environmental remediation projects can vary significantly in cost based on factors such as the type and extent of contamination, the specific remediation technologies employed, site accessibility, and regulatory requirements. A contract of this magnitude over an approximate 8-year period suggests a substantial project. To assess value, one would compare this contract's unit costs (e.g., cost per cubic yard of contaminated soil treated, cost per gallon of water remediated) against industry standards or historical data for comparable Army projects. The fact that it was awarded under full and open competition provides some assurance that the pricing was vetted, but a deeper dive into specific remediation tasks and their associated costs would be needed for a definitive value assessment.
What are the key risks associated with this environmental remediation contract, and how were they mitigated?
Key risks in environmental remediation contracts often include unforeseen site conditions (e.g., discovering additional contamination), changes in regulatory requirements, contractor performance issues, and potential cost overruns, even with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract. For this contract, awarded as FFP, the primary risk of cost overrun is borne by KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Mitigation strategies employed by the government likely included a thorough pre-award assessment of the site conditions, a robust technical evaluation of the proposed remediation plan, and clear performance standards in the contract. The government's oversight would focus on monitoring progress, ensuring compliance with the SOW, and managing any scope changes through formal modification processes. The long performance period also introduces risks related to the stability of the contractor and potential changes in environmental regulations over time.
How effective has KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. been in delivering environmental remediation services under this contract, based on available performance data?
Assessing the effectiveness of KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. under this specific contract requires access to performance reports, inspection records, and any formal evaluations conducted by the Department of the Army. Publicly available data often includes contract award details but may not always contain granular performance metrics or contractor ratings. If performance data indicates timely completion of milestones, adherence to quality standards, and successful remediation outcomes as defined by the SOW and regulatory requirements, then the contract can be considered effective. Conversely, any documented issues, disputes, or failures to meet objectives would suggest lower effectiveness. Without specific performance reviews or outcome data, a definitive judgment on effectiveness is limited.
What are the historical spending patterns for environmental remediation services by the Department of the Army, and how does this contract fit within that trend?
The Department of the Army, like other branches of the military, has consistently allocated significant funds towards environmental remediation due to the legacy of industrial activities and training exercises on its installations. Historical spending patterns reveal a sustained need for these services driven by environmental regulations (e.g., CERCLA, RCRA) and the ongoing management of contaminated sites. This $13.9M contract, awarded in 2004 and spanning until 2012, represents a specific investment within that broader trend. Analyzing Army-wide spending on environmental services over the years would provide context for the scale of this particular award. It fits within the trend of the Army addressing its environmental liabilities and ensuring compliance, often utilizing large, multi-year contracts to manage complex cleanup operations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1359A ELLSWORTH INDUSTRIAL BLVD, ATLANTA, GA, 30318
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F0046M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-04-29
Current End Date: 2012-05-30
Potential End Date: 2012-05-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-10-20
More Contracts from Kemron Environmental Services, Inc.
- Munitions Explosives of Concern Removal and Soil Investigation - Cpff Portion — $90.6M (Department of Defense)
- Emergency and Rapid Response Services IV (errs IV) Mississippi Phosphates Corporation, MS 39581 — $71.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Mississippi Phosphate Site Water Treatment System. Ssid: B45U — $42.0M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- FFP Environmental Remediation Svcs-Pcb Contaminated Soil Removal Port Heiden Alaska — $37.1M (Department of Defense)
- Errs V, Southeastern Wood Preserving Task Order: Remedial Action AT Southeastern Wood Preserving Site, Canton, Madison County, Mississippi — $25.7M (Environmental Protection Agency)
View all Kemron Environmental Services, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)