Titan Systems Corporation awarded $33M for ADP Systems Development Services, with a 5-year contract duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,712,018 ($10.7M)

Contractor: CACI NSS, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-08-16

End Date: 2009-07-13

Contract Duration: 1,792 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200411!005632!2100!W909MY!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS35F5396H !C!N! !Y!W909MY04F0038!P00001!20040816!20041231!003307972!003307972!048341838!N!TITAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION !8400 CORPORATE DRIVE !LANDOVER !MD!20785!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRINCE GEORGE S !MARYLAND !+000000280059!N!N!000000000000!D302!ADP SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!E!N! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: HYATTSVILLE, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20785

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.7 million to CACI NSS, LLC for work described as: 200411!005632!2100!W909MY!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS35F5396H !C!N! !Y!W909MY04F0038!P00001!20040816!20041231!003307972!003307972!048341838!N!TITAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION !8400 CORPORATE DRIVE !LANDOVER !MD!20785!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRIN… Key points: 1. Contract value of $33,079,720 over its life. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract type is Time and Materials. 4. Performance period spans from August 16, 2004, to July 13, 2009. 5. Services fall under ADP Systems Development Services. 6. Contractor is Titan Systems Corporation. 7. Geographic location of performance is Largo, Maryland.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $33,079,720 for ADP Systems Development Services over approximately five years appears to be within a reasonable range for such services, though specific benchmarks are difficult to ascertain without more granular data on the scope of work. The Time and Materials pricing structure introduces potential for cost overruns if not closely managed. Compared to similar IT services contracts, the overall value is moderate, but the lack of detailed performance metrics makes a definitive value-for-money assessment challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a competitive process was utilized. This level of competition is generally expected to drive better pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by fostering a marketplace where the most cost-effective solutions are likely to emerge, potentially leading to savings compared to less competitive procurement methods.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army, receiving ADP Systems Development Services. Services delivered include the development and support of automated data processing systems. Geographic impact is concentrated in Largo, Maryland, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for IT professionals and support staff at Titan Systems Corporation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value and effectiveness of the services provided.
Contract duration of nearly five years without clear break clauses could limit flexibility in adapting to changing technological needs.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Contractor, Titan Systems Corporation, has a defined presence and location for service delivery.
The contract clearly defines the service category (ADP Systems Development Services).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically focusing on ADP Systems Development Services. The IT services market is vast and highly competitive, with significant government spending allocated to software development, system integration, and IT support. Comparable spending benchmarks for ADP systems development can vary widely based on complexity, duration, and specific technologies employed. This contract represents a moderate investment within the broader IT services landscape for the Department of the Army.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'ss: false'. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. The primary contractor, Titan Systems Corporation, is likely a mid-to-large-sized business given the contract value and duration.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve the Department of the Army's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the Time and Materials contract, including adherence to labor rates and hours. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data, but detailed performance reports and oversight activities are not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense IT Services Contracts
ADP Systems Development
IT Professional Services
Time and Materials Contracts
Army IT Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure.
Lack of specific performance metrics hinders objective evaluation of service quality.
Limited transparency on contract modifications and their financial impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.7 million to CACI NSS, LLC. 200411!005632!2100!W909MY!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS35F5396H !C!N! !Y!W909MY04F0038!P00001!20040816!20041231!003307972!003307972!048341838!N!TITAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION !8400 CORPORATE DRIVE !LANDOVER !MD!20785!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRINCE GEORGE S !MARYLAND !+000000280059!N!N!000000000000!D302!ADP SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541990!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI NSS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-08-16. End: 2009-07-13.

What was the specific scope of work for the ADP Systems Development Services provided by Titan Systems Corporation?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'ADP SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' under NAICS code 541519. However, the specific scope of work, such as the types of systems developed, the technologies used, or the specific development lifecycle phases covered, is not detailed in the provided data. This level of detail is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the services rendered and for benchmarking against similar projects. Without this information, it's challenging to assess the complexity, innovation, or specific technical challenges addressed by Titan Systems Corporation.

How did the final contract cost compare to the initial estimated cost, if available?

The provided data shows a total award amount of $33,079,720. However, there is no information available regarding the initial estimated cost or any modifications that may have altered the contract's value throughout its performance period. For Time and Materials contracts, the final cost is heavily dependent on the actual hours worked and labor rates applied. A comparison between initial estimates and final costs would reveal the accuracy of government cost projections and the contractor's efficiency in managing resources.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Titan Systems Corporation's performance?

The available data does not specify any Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics used to evaluate Titan Systems Corporation. For IT services contracts, especially those involving system development, KPIs typically include factors like on-time delivery, adherence to budget, system functionality, user satisfaction, and defect rates. The absence of this information makes it difficult to objectively assess the quality and effectiveness of the services provided and whether the contract achieved its intended outcomes.

Were there any contract modifications or change orders issued during the contract period, and what was their impact?

The provided data does not include information on contract modifications or change orders. Contracts, particularly those spanning several years, often undergo modifications to adjust scope, timelines, or funding. Understanding the nature and impact of any modifications is essential for a complete picture of the contract's evolution, potential cost changes, and any shifts in the original requirements. Without this, the $33,079,720 award amount represents a static figure that may not reflect the full history of the contract.

What is the track record of Titan Systems Corporation with similar government contracts, particularly in ADP systems development?

The provided data identifies Titan Systems Corporation as the contractor for this specific ADP Systems Development Services contract. However, it does not offer insights into their broader track record with the government or specifically within ADP systems development. A comprehensive assessment would require examining their past performance on other federal contracts, including their success rates, any past performance issues, and their experience with similar technologies and project scopes. This information is crucial for evaluating the contractor's reliability and capability.

How does the per-hour labor rate for this contract compare to market rates for similar IT development services?

The provided data does not include specific per-hour labor rates or details about the labor categories involved in this Time and Materials contract. Therefore, a direct comparison to market rates for similar IT development services is not possible. Benchmarking labor rates is a critical component of assessing value for money in T&M contracts, as it helps determine if the government is paying competitive prices for the expertise provided. Without this data, it's difficult to ascertain if the pricing was optimal.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)

Address: 11955 FREEDOM DR STE 12000, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F5396H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline