DoD's $115.6M contract for Military Intelligence training awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $115,624,129 ($115.6M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-06-28
End Date: 2024-06-28
Contract Duration: 1,827 days
Daily Burn Rate: $63.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE 111TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE MI BRIGADE BDE NON COMMISSIONED OFFICERS ACADEMY NCOA TRAIN, INSTRUCT, TEACH, MENTOR AND EDUCATE MI SOLDIERS IN THEIR SPECIFIED MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES OR FUNCTIONAL AREAS. ALL METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED MUST KEEP PACE WITH, AND BE REFLECTIVE OF, A DYNAMIC CONTEMPORARY OPERATING ENVIRONMENT INFLUENCED BY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND EVOLVING DOCTRINES. THE 111TH MI BDE AND THE NCOA MUST FURNISH FULLY CAPABLE MI SOLDIERS TO THE FORCE WHOSE ABILITIES ARE BOTH CURRENT AND EFFECTIVE. SUCCESSFUL SUPPORT OF THE 111TH MI BDE AND THE NCOA IN ACHIEVING THIS MISSION WILL REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE STAFF WHOSE SKILLSETS, EXPERIENCE AND ABILITIES ARE SUFFICIENTLY ADVANCED TO ENABLE THEM TO WORK SEAMLESSLY ALONGSIDE MILITARY AND GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL AND ASSIST IN THE CONTINUAL PROCESS OF CURRICULA AND PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION EVOLUTION. ASSISTING THE GOVERNMENT IN KEEPING ALL ASPECTS OF COURSE CURRICULA CURRENT, RELEVANT AND EFFECTIVE ACCORDING TO MODERN TACTICS, TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES IS A KEY OBJECTIVE.
Place of Performance
Location: FORT HUACHUCA, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85613
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $115.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: THE 111TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE MI BRIGADE BDE NON COMMISSIONED OFFICERS ACADEMY NCOA TRAIN, INSTRUCT, TEACH, MENTOR AND EDUCATE MI SOLDIERS IN THEIR SPECIFIED MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES OR FUNCTIONAL AREAS. ALL METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED MUST KEEP PACE WITH, AND BE REFLECTIV… Key points: 1. Value for money assessed through benchmarking against similar training contracts. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, potentially driving competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators include contract duration and the need for specialized, up-to-date training methodologies. 4. Performance context requires instructors to keep pace with emerging technologies and evolving doctrines. 5. Sector positioning within professional development training for military occupational specialties.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of $115.6 million over five years suggests a significant investment in specialized military intelligence training. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training and professional development contracts within the Department of Defense is crucial for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure implies that while the contractor's profit is fixed, the government bears the risk of cost overruns. This necessitates close monitoring of expenditures to ensure efficiency and prevent unnecessary costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of a competitive bidding process is generally expected to lead to more favorable pricing and better service offerings for the government. The specific number of bidders and the evaluation criteria would provide further insight into the intensity of the competition and its impact on the final negotiated price.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition suggests that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by leveraging market forces to secure the best possible training services at a competitive price.
Public Impact
Benefits military intelligence soldiers by providing essential training for their occupational specialties. Delivers critical instruction, mentorship, and education to enhance soldier capabilities. Geographic impact is primarily within the operational areas of the 111th Military Intelligence Brigade. Workforce implications include the development of a highly skilled and current MI soldier force.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Ensuring training methodologies remain current with rapidly evolving technologies and doctrines.
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts.
- Reliance on contractor expertise for specialized and advanced skillsets.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Long-term contract (5 years) provides stability for training continuity.
- Focus on critical Military Intelligence skills essential for national security.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional and management development training sector, specifically catering to the unique needs of military intelligence. The market for specialized defense training is substantial, driven by the continuous need for personnel to adapt to new technologies and operational environments. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale training contracts awarded by the DoD for specialized skill development, particularly in intelligence and technology-related fields.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if Amentum Technology, Inc. chooses to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals mandated in the contract, the direct benefit to the small business ecosystem is uncertain and depends on the prime contractor's procurement practices.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the requiring activity within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement, requiring adherence to training standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and financial reviews are usually internal to the agency.
Related Government Programs
- Military Intelligence Training
- Professional Development Services
- Defense Contractor Training
- Specialized Military Education
- Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure.
- Ensuring training remains current with rapidly evolving technology and doctrine.
- Reliance on contractor expertise for specialized skills.
- Need for robust government oversight of performance and costs.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, military-intelligence, nco-training, professional-development, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, training-services, arizona, amentum-technology-inc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $115.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. THE 111TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE MI BRIGADE BDE NON COMMISSIONED OFFICERS ACADEMY NCOA TRAIN, INSTRUCT, TEACH, MENTOR AND EDUCATE MI SOLDIERS IN THEIR SPECIFIED MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES OR FUNCTIONAL AREAS. ALL METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED MUST KEEP PACE WITH, AND BE REFLECTIVE OF, A DYNAMIC CONTEMPORARY OPERATING ENVIRONMENT INFLUENCED BY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND EVOLVING DOCTRINES. THE 111TH MI BDE AND THE NCOA MUST FURNISH FULLY CAPABLE MI SOLDIERS TO THE FORCE WHOSE ABILITIES ARE BOTH C
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $115.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-06-28. End: 2024-06-28.
What is the track record of Amentum Technology, Inc. in providing similar military intelligence training services?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant presence in the government contracting space, often providing a range of services including training, logistics, and technical support to various defense and intelligence agencies. While specific details on their Military Intelligence (MI) training track record for this particular brigade require deeper investigation into past performance evaluations and contract history, the company's overall experience suggests a capacity to handle complex training requirements. Analyzing their performance on previous, comparable contracts, particularly those involving specialized technical or intelligence training, would be essential to fully assess their suitability and past success in delivering similar outcomes. This would include reviewing any past performance questionnaires, award-fee evaluations, and any documented instances of outstanding performance or deficiencies.
How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) structure impact the value proposition for this training contract?
The Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contract structure means that the contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred in performing the contract, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing their profit. This structure shifts the primary cost risk to the government, as any cost overruns beyond the initially estimated total cost will be borne by the government. While it can be advantageous for complex or uncertain projects where cost estimation is difficult, it necessitates robust government oversight to control expenditures and ensure efficiency. The 'value for money' in a CPFF contract is therefore heavily dependent on the government's ability to effectively monitor costs, manage scope, and ensure the contractor is operating efficiently to achieve the fixed fee without excessive spending. Benchmarking against fixed-price contracts for similar services, where cost risk is on the contractor, would highlight potential differences in overall cost efficiency.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this training contract?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract would likely focus on the effectiveness and relevance of the training provided to Military Intelligence (MI) soldiers. Specific KPIs could include measures of student learning outcomes, such as pass rates on proficiency tests, successful completion of required military occupational specialty (MOS) qualifications, and post-training performance evaluations of soldiers in their operational units. The timeliness and accuracy of instruction delivery, adherence to updated doctrinal requirements, and the integration of emerging technologies into the curriculum would also be critical. Furthermore, feedback from both the soldiers receiving training and their commanding officers would serve as important qualitative KPIs. The contractor's ability to maintain a cadre of qualified instructors with relevant, up-to-date expertise is also a crucial performance metric.
What is the historical spending trend for Military Intelligence NCO training within the Department of the Army?
Analyzing historical spending trends for Military Intelligence (MI) Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) training within the Department of the Army is crucial for contextualizing the $115.6 million awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. This requires examining budget allocations and contract awards specifically for MI NCO academies and related training programs over several fiscal years. Trends might reveal increasing or decreasing investment in MI capabilities, shifts in training methodologies (e.g., towards digital or simulation-based training), and the typical contract vehicles used (e.g., sole-source vs. competitive). Understanding these patterns helps assess whether the current contract represents a significant increase or decrease in spending, whether it aligns with broader Army modernization efforts, and if the pricing is consistent with historical expenditures for similar training requirements. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to determine if this award is an anomaly or part of a sustained investment.
How does the requirement for instructors to 'keep pace with emerging technologies and evolving doctrines' influence contract risk and cost?
The requirement for instructors to 'keep pace with emerging technologies and evolving doctrines' introduces significant risk and potential cost escalation into the contract. It necessitates that the contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., invests continuously in its personnel's professional development, potentially requiring ongoing training, certifications, and access to cutting-edge information. This dynamic requirement makes fixed-price contracts challenging, which is likely why a Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) structure was chosen. The risk lies in the government's ability to verify that the contractor is indeed meeting this requirement effectively and that the associated costs are reasonable. It also implies a need for flexible curriculum development and adaptation, which can be more expensive than delivering static training content. The government must actively monitor the relevance and currency of the training to ensure the investment yields capable MI soldiers prepared for contemporary operating environments.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training
Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W900KK17R0014
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 5401 W KENNEDY BLVD STE 900, TAMPA, FL, 33609
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $115,896,148
Exercised Options: $115,896,148
Current Obligation: $115,624,129
Actual Outlays: $49,001
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 61
Total Subaward Amount: $54,328,652
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W900KK19D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-06-28
Current End Date: 2024-06-28
Potential End Date: 2024-06-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-10-31
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)