DoD awards $539M for MQ-1C Gray Eagle systems, including attrition aircraft and training

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $539,429,940 ($539.4M)

Contractor: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-07-06

End Date: 2023-08-14

Contract Duration: 4,056 days

Daily Burn Rate: $133.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FY 12 PROCUREMENT OF TWO (2) MQ-1C GRAY EAGLE SYSTEMS FOR FIELDING UNITS SIXTH AND SEVENTH UNIT EQUIPPED (UE) AND FIVE (5) ADDITIONAL ATTRITION AIRCRAFT, INCLUDING INITIAL SPARES, PLUS ADDITIONAL HARDWARE NECESSARY TO BACK-FILL FIELDED UNITS FIRST THRU THE FIFTH UE, UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS TRAINING BASE IN FT. HUACHUCA (FHU), AZ AND RAPID INTEGRATION AND ACCEPTANCE CENTER (RIAC) IN DUGWAY, UT WITH THE LATEST CONFIGURATION OF GROUND EQUIPMENT FOR LRIP (LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION) III

Place of Performance

Location: POWAY, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92064

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $539.4 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: FY 12 PROCUREMENT OF TWO (2) MQ-1C GRAY EAGLE SYSTEMS FOR FIELDING UNITS SIXTH AND SEVENTH UNIT EQUIPPED (UE) AND FIVE (5) ADDITIONAL ATTRITION AIRCRAFT, INCLUDING INITIAL SPARES, PLUS ADDITIONAL HARDWARE NECESSARY TO BACK-FILL FIELDED UNITS FIRST THRU THE FIFTH UE, UNMANNED AIRC… Key points: 1. The contract covers two MQ-1C Gray Eagle systems, five attrition aircraft, and associated training and ground equipment. 2. General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. is the sole contractor for this low-rate initial production (LRIP) III award. 3. The contract includes initial spares and back-filling for previously fielded units, indicating ongoing sustainment needs. 4. The fixed-price incentive contract type aims to balance cost control with contractor performance.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is substantial, reflecting the complexity and quantity of unmanned aircraft systems and support equipment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale UAS procurements would be necessary for a precise value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. The lack of competition may limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award means taxpayers may not have benefited from competitive pricing, potentially increasing the overall cost of acquiring these critical defense assets.

Public Impact

Enhances intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities for Army units. Supports ongoing military operations and readiness by providing advanced unmanned aerial vehicles. Invests in training infrastructure and personnel to effectively operate and maintain the Gray Eagle systems. Contributes to the modernization of the U.S. military's unmanned aircraft fleet.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The Department of the Army's procurement of MQ-1C Gray Eagle systems falls within the broader aerospace and defense manufacturing sector. Spending on unmanned aerial systems (UAS) has been a significant trend, driven by evolving military requirements for ISR and strike capabilities.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded directly to a large prime contractor, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. There is no indication of significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's long duration and sole-source nature warrant close oversight to ensure cost control and performance. Regular reviews of contractor progress and adherence to contract terms are essential for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ca, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $539.4 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.. FY 12 PROCUREMENT OF TWO (2) MQ-1C GRAY EAGLE SYSTEMS FOR FIELDING UNITS SIXTH AND SEVENTH UNIT EQUIPPED (UE) AND FIVE (5) ADDITIONAL ATTRITION AIRCRAFT, INCLUDING INITIAL SPARES, PLUS ADDITIONAL HARDWARE NECESSARY TO BACK-FILL FIELDED UNITS FIRST THRU THE FIFTH UE, UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS TRAINING BASE IN FT. HUACHUCA (FHU), AZ AND RAPID INTEGRATION AND ACCEPTANCE CENTER (RIAC) IN DUGWAY, UT WITH THE LATEST CONFIGURATION OF GROUND EQUIPMENT FOR LRIP (LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION) III

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $539.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-07-06. End: 2023-08-14.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or a lack of viable alternatives. To ensure fair and reasonable pricing, the government would likely conduct detailed cost analyses, review historical pricing data, and potentially negotiate profit margins. However, without competition, the inherent price discovery mechanism is absent, making robust government negotiation and analysis even more critical.

How does the cost of the MQ-1C Gray Eagle systems compare to similar unmanned aircraft systems procured competitively?

Direct comparison is challenging without specific competitive procurement data for similar systems. However, sole-source awards are generally expected to be higher than competitively bid contracts due to the absence of market pressure. A thorough analysis would involve benchmarking against other medium-altitude, long-endurance UAS programs, considering their capabilities, payload, and operational lifecycles to assess value.

What are the long-term cost implications of this contract, considering the inclusion of spares, training, and potential sustainment needs?

This contract includes initial spares and training, but the long duration (4056 days) suggests significant sustainment costs beyond the initial award. Future sustainment, maintenance, upgrades, and potential follow-on procurements represent substantial long-term financial commitments. The government must plan for these lifecycle costs to accurately assess the total ownership cost and budget accordingly.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W58RGZ11R0320

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Atomics

Address: 14200 KIRKHAM WAY, POWAY, CA, 92064

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $539,429,940

Exercised Options: $539,429,940

Current Obligation: $539,429,940

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-07-06

Current End Date: 2023-08-14

Potential End Date: 2023-08-14 12:08:00

Last Modified: 2023-08-08

More Contracts from General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.

View all General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending