DoD Awards $15.9M Option to MITRE Corp for Engineering Services, Extending Contract to December 2018

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $507,898,625 ($507.9M)

Contractor: THE Mitre Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-10-01

End Date: 2018-12-31

Contract Duration: 456 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1M/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF EXERCISING OF OPTION FOUR AND ADDING CLINS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,917,636 AND ADDED PWS AND DD 254 FOR SEVERAL PROJECTS

Place of Performance

Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $507.9 million to THE MITRE CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF EXERCISING OF OPTION FOUR AND ADDING CLINS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,917,636 AND ADDED PWS AND DD 254 FOR SEVERAL PROJECTS Key points: 1. The contract extension adds $15.9 million to the total value, bringing it to over $507 million. 2. MITRE Corporation, a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC), is the sole awardee. 3. The contract is for engineering services, a broad category with potential for competition. 4. The 'NOT COMPETED' status raises questions about the procurement process and potential for better pricing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The total award value exceeds $507 million. Without specific per-unit cost data or benchmarks for similar engineering services contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The lack of competition is a primary concern.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The MITRE Corporation. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as competitive pressures are absent.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a significant contract value may result in suboptimal pricing, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense continues to rely on MITRE Corporation for critical engineering services. Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. The extension of services without re-competition warrants scrutiny regarding long-term cost-effectiveness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) is a broad sector encompassing various technical and consulting services. Spending in this area can vary significantly based on project complexity and agency needs. Benchmarks are difficult without specific service details.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded to The MITRE Corporation, a non-profit FFRDC, and was not competed. Therefore, there is no indication of small business participation in this specific award action.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests a potential lapse in oversight regarding competitive procurement practices. Further review is needed to understand the justification for not seeking other offers.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $507.9 million to THE MITRE CORPORATION. IGF::OT::IGF EXERCISING OF OPTION FOUR AND ADDING CLINS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,917,636 AND ADDED PWS AND DD 254 FOR SEVERAL PROJECTS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE MITRE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $507.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-10-01. End: 2018-12-31.

What is the specific justification for exercising this option as a sole-source award rather than re-competing the requirement?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED.' A sole-source award typically requires a justification, such as unique capabilities possessed only by the contractor or urgent and compelling needs. Without this justification, it's unclear why competitive procedures were bypassed, potentially impacting value for money.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded competitively?

Direct comparison is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns and specific service scopes. However, sole-source contracts generally carry a higher risk of inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure. Benchmarking against competitively awarded contracts for similar services would be necessary to assess potential overpricing.

What is the long-term strategy for acquiring these engineering services, and will future requirements be competed?

The data only reflects an option exercise for a specific period. The long-term strategy is not evident. Agencies should ideally plan for competitive procurements to ensure fair pricing and access to innovation. A review of the contract's history and future plans would clarify the agency's approach to competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTOTHER RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7515 COLSHIRE DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $705,629,525

Exercised Options: $705,629,525

Current Obligation: $507,898,625

Actual Outlays: $558,289

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 14

Total Subaward Amount: $1,880,140

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-10-01

Current End Date: 2018-12-31

Potential End Date: 2018-12-31 12:12:00

Last Modified: 2024-09-06

More Contracts from THE Mitre Corporation

View all THE Mitre Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending