DoD Awards $65.5M for CHECK-6 CAMERAS, Sole-Sourced to BAE Systems
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $65,482,441 ($65.5M)
Contractor: BAE Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-02-26
End Date: 2011-12-31
Contract Duration: 673 days
Daily Burn Rate: $97.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: CHECK-6 CAMERAS FOR CI ARMY
Place of Performance
Location: AUSTIN, TRAVIS County, TEXAS, 78725
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $65.5 million to BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC. for work described as: CHECK-6 CAMERAS FOR CI ARMY Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $65.5 million awarded. 2. Sole-source award to BAE Systems indicates limited competition. 3. Contract duration of 673 days suggests a substantial project. 4. Focus on 'Other Electronic Component Manufacturing' sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The award amount of $65.5 million for 'CHECK-6 CAMERAS' lacks specific per-unit cost data for a direct comparison. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no competition. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award raises concerns about potential overspending and reduced value for taxpayer funds.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have paid a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. The specific use of these cameras for the Army's 'CHECK-6' program is not detailed, limiting public understanding of the necessity. The sole-source nature of the contract could stifle innovation from other potential vendors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Limited transparency on pricing
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a known entity (BAE Systems)
- Clear contract end date
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under 'Other Electronic Component Manufacturing,' a broad category. Benchmarking spending in this specific niche is challenging without more granular data on the camera system's components and capabilities.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to BAE Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc., a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this sole-source award.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny. Further investigation into the justification for not pursuing a competitive process would be beneficial for oversight.
Related Government Programs
- Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition and potentially increases cost.
- Lack of detailed justification for sole-sourcing.
- Absence of per-unit cost data hinders value assessment.
- Limited transparency on the specific function and necessity of the cameras.
Tags
other-electronic-component-manufacturing, department-of-defense, tx, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $65.5 million to BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC.. CHECK-6 CAMERAS FOR CI ARMY
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION & ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $65.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-02-26. End: 2011-12-31.
What specific capabilities do the CHECK-6 cameras provide, and how do they enhance Army operations to justify a sole-source award?
The specific capabilities of the CHECK-6 cameras are not publicly detailed in the provided data. Justification for a sole-source award typically requires demonstrating unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs that cannot be met through competition. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the necessity and value proposition of this specific procurement.
What was the rationale behind the sole-source determination, and were any market research efforts conducted to identify potential competitors?
The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' suggesting a sole-source justification was made. However, the specific rationale and details of any market research are absent. Agencies usually need to document why competition is not feasible, such as the existence of only one responsible source or urgent and compelling circumstances. This information is crucial for assessing the procurement's integrity.
How does the $65.5 million contract value compare to similar electronic component manufacturing contracts, considering the lack of competitive pricing?
Direct comparison of the $65.5 million contract value is difficult due to the 'Other Electronic Component Manufacturing' classification and the sole-source nature. Without competitive bids, establishing a benchmark price is challenging. The absence of per-unit cost data further complicates an assessment of whether this price represents fair market value compared to potentially competitive procurements in related electronic systems.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing › Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: INSTRUMENTS AND LABORATORY EQPT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W56HZV09R0505
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: BAE Systems PLC (UEI: 217304393)
Address: 6500 TRACOR LANE, AUSTIN, TX, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $65,482,441
Exercised Options: $65,482,441
Current Obligation: $65,482,441
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-02-26
Current End Date: 2011-12-31
Potential End Date: 2011-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-06-13
More Contracts from BAE Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc.
- FRP-12+ Wgu-59a/B Guidance Sections — $430.4M (Department of Defense)
- Procurement of Apkws II Wgu-59/B Guidance Sections — $399.6M (Department of Defense)
- FRP 8 Delivery for Wgu-59/B Guidance Sections — $329.6M (Department of Defense)
- Procurement of 11,000 Apkws FRP-13 Wgu-59a/B Guidance Sections USN (2,334) US Army (503) Bahrain (60) Czech Republic (600) Poland (7,058) Singapore (96) and Sdaf (349) — $322.5M (Department of Defense)
- This Order Procures Wgu-59/B Guidance Sections for FRP6 — $299.3M (Department of Defense)
View all BAE Systems Information & Electronic Systems Integration Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)