Army Awards $40.4M for ACWS IOC Task Order to CGI Federal Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $40,426,237 ($40.4M)
Contractor: CGI Federal Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-08-28
End Date: 2022-12-15
Contract Duration: 1,570 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: ARMY CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM (ACWS) - INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY TASK ORDER AWARD
Place of Performance
Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $40.4 million to CGI FEDERAL INC. for work described as: ARMY CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM (ACWS) - INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY TASK ORDER AWARD Key points: 1. Contract awarded to CGI Federal Inc. for $40.4 million. 2. Task order falls under Computer Systems Design Services (NAICS 541512). 3. Full and open competition was utilized. 4. Contract duration is 1570 days, ending December 15, 2022. 5. This award is a delivery order.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $40.4 million for a 1570-day duration suggests a moderate per-diem rate. Benchmarking against similar IT system design contracts would be necessary for a precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently, though a detailed cost-benefit analysis is not provided.
Public Impact
Enhances the Army's capability for contract writing. Supports the Department of the Army's IT infrastructure. Impacts personnel involved in contract management and execution. Potential for improved efficiency in military procurement processes.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is lengthy (1570 days).
- Specific performance metrics are not detailed in the provided data.
- Potential for scope creep in a long-term IT project.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm fixed price contract type can limit cost overruns.
- Supports a critical government function (contract writing).
Sector Analysis
The IT services sector, particularly system design and development, sees significant government spending. Benchmarks for similar contract writing systems vary widely based on complexity and scope.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this was a full and open competition, and there is no specific mention of small business participation or set-asides. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to compete.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve program management reviews, performance monitoring, and financial audits by the Department of the Army to ensure contract compliance and effective use of funds.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lengthy contract duration.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope changes.
- Limited insight into small business participation.
- Need for detailed benchmarking for value assessment.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $40.4 million to CGI FEDERAL INC.. ARMY CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM (ACWS) - INITIAL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY TASK ORDER AWARD
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CGI FEDERAL INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $40.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-08-28. End: 2022-12-15.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for the ACWS IOC and how was performance measured against them?
The provided data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the Army Contract Writing System (ACWS) Initial Operational Capability (IOC). Typically, KPIs for such systems would include metrics related to system uptime, user satisfaction, processing speed, data accuracy, and successful completion of contract writing tasks. Performance measurement would involve regular reporting, user feedback mechanisms, and potentially independent verification and validation.
What is the benchmark cost per user or per contract processed for similar systems to assess the value of this $40.4M award?
Establishing a precise benchmark for cost per user or per contract processed for the ACWS IOC is challenging without detailed system specifications and usage data. However, industry averages for large-scale government IT system development and deployment can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars per user annually, or a significant cost per contract managed. The $40.4M award over approximately 4.3 years suggests a substantial investment, necessitating comparison with similar military or federal contract management systems.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the government received the best possible technical solution and price?
A full and open competition theoretically maximizes the chances of receiving the best technical solution and price by allowing all responsible sources to submit offers. The effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the rigor of the evaluation process. Without access to the solicitation details and the evaluation results, it's difficult to definitively assess how well this specific competition achieved optimal outcomes, though the process itself is designed for this purpose.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12601 FAIR LAKES CIR, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $40,426,237
Exercised Options: $40,426,237
Current Obligation: $40,426,237
Actual Outlays: $2,180,431
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 61
Total Subaward Amount: $9,798,094
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W52P1J17D0031
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-08-28
Current End Date: 2022-12-15
Potential End Date: 2022-12-15 12:12:00
Last Modified: 2024-09-11
More Contracts from CGI Federal Inc.
- Award - to Re-Obligate Funds Usda De-Obligated to — $783.3M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Passport Production Support Services (ppss)igf::ot::igf — $620.0M (Department of State)
- Operation of the Tucson Passport Center and Arkansas Passport Center — $401.9M (Department of State)
- Dynamic and Evolving Federal Enterprise Network Defense Group C Defend C — $336.2M (General Services Administration)
- TO Provide Comprehensive Onsite Management, Administration, and Processing Support AT Three (3) Passport Centers, and Twenty Four (24) Passport Agencies Nationwide. Both Initial and Renewal of Passport Books/Card Applications ARE Processed Under This — $324.1M (Department of State)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)