Army's $144M IT Services Contract Awarded to Stanley Associates Inc. in 2004

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $86,693,236 ($86.7M)

Contractor: CGI Federal Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-10-15

End Date: 2009-10-31

Contract Duration: 1,842 days

Daily Burn Rate: $47.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200501!000047!2100!W52P1J!U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !W52P1J04C0101 !A!N! !Y! ! !20041015!20051031!144202843!144202843!144202843!N!STANLEY ASSOCIATES INC !3101 WILSON BLVD STE 700 !ARLINGTON !VA!22201!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000010331969!N!N!000000000000!D307!AUTOMATED INFO SYSTEM DESIGN & INTEGRATION SVCS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541511!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B!F!N!A! !A!N!U!2!002!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $86.7 million to CGI FEDERAL INC. for work described as: 200501!000047!2100!W52P1J!U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !W52P1J04C0101 !A!N! !Y! ! !20041015!20051031!144202843!144202843!144202843!N!STANLEY ASSOCIATES INC !3101 WILSON BLVD STE 700 !ARLINGTON !VA!22201!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEX… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $144.2 million, was for Automated Information System Design & Integration Services. 2. Awarded in 2004, the contract had a duration of 1842 days, ending in October 2009. 3. The primary contractor was Stanley Associates Inc., with CGI Federal Inc. listed as a competitor. 4. The sector is Information Technology, specifically Custom Computer Programming Services. 5. The contract type was a Definitive Contract under Full and Open Competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $144.2 million for IT services in 2004 appears reasonable given the scope of system design and integration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT projects from that era would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. Multiple bids were likely considered, leading to a competitive pricing outcome.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally ensures taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering competitive pricing among qualified vendors.

Public Impact

Ensured the U.S. Army had access to critical IT system design and integration capabilities. Supported the modernization and efficiency of Army information systems. Provided employment opportunities within the IT sector for Stanley Associates Inc. and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration of nearly 5 years may lead to scope creep or outdated technology.
Cost-plus fixed fee contract type can incentivize contractor to increase costs.
Limited information on specific performance metrics and outcomes.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating potential for good value.
Clear definition of services (Automated Info System Design & Integration).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically custom computer programming services. In 2004, government IT spending was significant, driven by needs for system modernization and cybersecurity.

Small Business Impact

The data does not explicitly indicate the extent of small business participation in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of oversight for this specific contract would depend on detailed performance reviews and audits.

Related Government Programs

Custom Computer Programming Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
Long contract duration potentially leading to outdated solutions.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data.
Potential for cost overruns inherent in CPFF contracts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $86.7 million to CGI FEDERAL INC.. 200501!000047!2100!W52P1J!U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !W52P1J04C0101 !A!N! !Y! ! !20041015!20051031!144202843!144202843!144202843!N!STANLEY ASSOCIATES INC !3101 WILSON BLVD STE 700 !ARLINGTON !VA!22201!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000010331969!N!N!000000000000!D307!AUTOMATED INFO SYSTEM DESIGN & INTEGRATION SVCS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541511!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CGI FEDERAL INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $86.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-10-15. End: 2009-10-31.

What was the specific impact of the 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee' contract type on the final cost to the government?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure means the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. While it aims to provide a predictable profit margin, it can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs to justify the fixed fee, potentially leading to a higher overall expenditure than a fixed-price contract if not managed tightly through robust oversight and cost controls.

How did the competition between Stanley Associates Inc. and CGI Federal Inc. influence the final contract price and terms?

The presence of a known competitor like CGI Federal Inc. suggests that Stanley Associates Inc. likely submitted a competitive bid to secure the contract. This competition should have driven down the price and improved the terms offered. However, the exact impact on the final price is difficult to ascertain without access to the bid details and negotiation records.

Were the Automated Information System Design & Integration Services delivered under this contract successfully met the Army's evolving needs throughout its duration?

Assessing the success requires evaluating the Army's satisfaction with the delivered systems and their continued relevance. Given the contract's duration (2004-2009), it's possible that initial system designs required updates or modifications to keep pace with technological advancements and changing operational requirements. Specific performance reviews and user feedback would be necessary for a definitive answer.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CGI Inc (UEI: 248513116)

Address: 12601 FAIR LAKES CIR, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline