DoD's $29.9M base operations support contract for Ft. Novosel awarded to Pride Industries

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,923,221 ($29.9M)

Contractor: Pride Industries

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-09-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $41.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BASE OPERATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FT. NOVOSEL, AL.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT NOVOSEL, DALE County, ALABAMA, 36362

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.9 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES for work described as: BASE OPERATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FT. NOVOSEL, AL. Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price competition. 2. The contract duration of 729 days suggests a need for consistent service delivery. 3. Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) are critical for military installation readiness. 4. The base value of $29.9M over two years indicates significant operational scope. 5. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, but sole-source nature raises concerns. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially impacting small business participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's base value of $29.9M for two years of base operations support at Ft. Novosel appears substantial. Without comparable sole-source contracts for similar installations, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the lack of competition inherent in a sole-source award typically leads to less favorable pricing than a fully competed contract. Benchmarking against industry standards for facilities support services would be necessary to determine if the pricing is reasonable, but the absence of competitive bids makes this difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. This typically occurs when only one responsible source is available or authorized by statute. The lack of competition means there were no other bidders to compare against, which can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for the government compared to a competitive procurement.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government did not leverage the potential for lower prices that multiple offers could have generated.

Public Impact

Military personnel and their families at Ft. Novosel benefit from well-maintained facilities and essential support services. The contract ensures the continuity of critical services such as maintenance, groundskeeping, and facility management. The geographic impact is concentrated at Ft. Novosel, Alabama, supporting the local military installation. The contract supports a workforce responsible for maintaining the operational readiness of the base.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pressure on pricing.
Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-source award.
Potential for cost overruns without competitive benchmarking.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type helps to cap costs.
Long-term contract suggests a stable and ongoing need for services.
Services are essential for military base operations and readiness.

Sector Analysis

The Facilities Support Services sector (NAICS 561210) encompasses a broad range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This contract falls within the government's significant spending on base operations and infrastructure support for military installations. The market for these services is competitive, but specific installation support contracts can sometimes be sole-sourced due to unique requirements or existing contractor capabilities. The annual value of this contract, approximately $15M, is moderate within the context of large-scale government facilities management.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in providing these essential base operations support services are limited under this specific award. The prime contractor, Pride Industries, is a large business, and the absence of a small business set-aside or subcontracting plan could mean less direct benefit to the small business ecosystem in this instance.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices at Ft. Novosel. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's performance work statement (PWS), with potential for penalties for non-performance. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature of the award; however, contract award data is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support Services
Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Department of Defense Installation Support
Army Facilities Management

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of competition
Potential for price inefficiency

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.9 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES. BASE OPERATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FT. NOVOSEL, AL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRIDE INDUSTRIES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the track record of Pride Industries in performing similar base operations support services for the Department of Defense?

Pride Industries has a significant history of providing facilities management and operations support services to various government agencies, including the Department of Defense. They have held numerous contracts for base operations, maintenance, and related services at military installations across the United States. Their experience often includes a wide range of services such as custodial, grounds maintenance, pest control, and minor repairs. While specific performance metrics for this particular contract are not yet available due to its recent award, Pride Industries is generally recognized as a large, established provider in this sector with extensive experience in government contracting. A deeper dive into their past performance reviews and any contract disputes or awards would provide a more granular understanding of their capabilities and reliability.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar base operations support contracts awarded competitively?

Direct comparison of pricing is challenging because this contract was awarded on a sole-source basis. Competitive procurements typically result in lower prices due to market forces and multiple bidders vying for the contract. Sole-source awards, by their nature, lack this competitive pressure. To benchmark the value, one would need to identify similar base operations support contracts for installations of comparable size and scope that were awarded competitively. Analyzing the per-unit costs for specific services (e.g., cost per square foot for janitorial services, cost per acre for grounds maintenance) across different contracts would reveal potential price differences. Without such comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state whether the pricing is optimal, but the sole-source nature suggests a potential for higher costs than a competitive scenario.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for essential base operations support?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for essential base operations support include potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competition, reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve efficiency, and a lack of transparency in the procurement process. Taxpayers may bear a higher cost compared to a competitively bid contract. Furthermore, if the sole-source contractor experiences performance issues or financial instability, the government has limited alternatives for immediate replacement without initiating a new, potentially lengthy, sole-source justification or a full competitive procurement. This can lead to service disruptions and impact base readiness.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the operational effectiveness and readiness of Ft. Novosel?

This contract is expected to have a positive impact on the operational effectiveness and readiness of Ft. Novosel by ensuring the consistent delivery of essential base operations support services. These services, which include maintenance, groundskeeping, and facility management, are critical for maintaining a safe, functional, and secure environment for military personnel and their families. Reliable execution of these services prevents degradation of infrastructure, supports daily training and operational activities, and contributes to overall morale. The continuity provided by a two-year contract aims to minimize disruptions and maintain a high standard of facility upkeep, directly supporting the base's mission.

What is the historical spending trend for Base Operations Support Services at Ft. Novosel or similar Army installations?

Historical spending on Base Operations Support Services (BOSS) at Army installations like Ft. Novosel typically represents a significant portion of the installation's operating budget. Spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, modernization projects, and changes in service requirements. For Ft. Novosel specifically, tracking past BOSS contracts would reveal trends in service scope and cost over time. Generally, the Army aims for cost-efficiency through various contracting strategies, including competitive bidding where feasible. However, sole-source awards for specific services or installations can occur, influencing overall spending patterns. Analyzing multi-year spending data for BOSS at similar installations would provide context for the current $29.9M award, indicating whether it aligns with historical investment levels or represents a notable increase or decrease.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10030 FOOTHILLS BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 95747

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $171,911,036

Exercised Options: $96,618,983

Current Obligation: $29,923,221

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline