DoD Spends $94.3M on Bradley Reactive Armor Tile Sets from General Dynamics-OTS, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $94,258,444 ($94.3M)

Contractor: General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-08-26

End Date: 2015-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,800 days

Daily Burn Rate: $52.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: UCA - 440 BRADLEY REACTIVE ARMOR TILE SETS

Place of Performance

Location: BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN County, VERMONT, 05401, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Vermont Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $94.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC. for work described as: UCA - 440 BRADLEY REACTIVE ARMOR TILE SETS Key points: 1. Significant investment in specialized armored vehicle components. 2. Sole-source award to General Dynamics-OTS, Inc. raises competition concerns. 3. Contract duration of 1800 days suggests long-term program needs. 4. High value contract warrants close scrutiny for cost-effectiveness.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $94.3 million for 440 tile sets results in a per-unit cost of approximately $214,223. Benchmarking this against similar specialized defense components is difficult without more granular data, but the lack of competition suggests potential for inflated pricing.

Cost Per Unit: $214,223

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This significantly limits price discovery and negotiation leverage, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive procurement process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for this substantial contract likely results in a higher cost to taxpayers than if multiple vendors had vied for the business.

Public Impact

Enhances survivability of Bradley Fighting Vehicles, a key asset for ground forces. Supports the operational readiness of the U.S. Army. Procurement of specialized military hardware can influence defense industry dynamics.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This procurement falls under the 'Other Ordnance and Accessories Manufacturing' sector. Defense spending in this area is critical for maintaining military hardware capabilities. Benchmarks for specialized armor components are often proprietary or difficult to ascertain due to unique specifications.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or participation by small businesses in this contract. Sole-source awards often bypass opportunities for small business subcontracting unless explicitly mandated.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'DCA' award action code suggests a Direct Commercial Agreement, which may have different oversight requirements than traditional government contracts. Further investigation into the specific oversight mechanisms for this sole-source award is warranted.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-ordnance-and-accessories-manufactu, department-of-defense, vt, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $94.3 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC.. UCA - 440 BRADLEY REACTIVE ARMOR TILE SETS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $94.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-08-26. End: 2015-07-31.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and were alternative procurement methods considered?

The justification for a sole-source award is typically based on factors like unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of viable alternatives. Without specific documentation, it's unclear if alternatives were thoroughly explored. A competitive process would likely have yielded better pricing and potentially identified other qualified suppliers, ensuring better value for taxpayer funds.

How does the per-unit cost of these reactive armor tile sets compare to similar systems or previous procurements?

The per-unit cost of approximately $214,223 is substantial. Direct comparisons are challenging without access to proprietary data or specific technical requirements of alternative systems. However, given the sole-source nature, it's reasonable to question if this price reflects market value or a premium due to limited competition.

What is the long-term strategic value and operational impact of these specific reactive armor tile sets for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle?

Reactive armor significantly enhances the survivability of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle against modern threats, particularly anti-tank guided missiles. This upgrade is crucial for maintaining the effectiveness and safety of ground troops operating these platforms in combat zones, directly impacting mission success and personnel protection.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingOther Ordnance and Accessories Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W15QKN10R0600

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 128 LAKESIDE AVE, BURLINGTON, VT, 05401

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $94,258,444

Exercised Options: $94,258,444

Current Obligation: $94,258,444

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-08-26

Current End Date: 2015-07-31

Potential End Date: 2015-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-05-29

More Contracts from General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.

View all General Dynamics-Ots, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending