DoD's $261M explosives contract awarded to Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC, with no competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $261,071,279 ($261.1M)
Contractor: Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-06-30
End Date: 2015-01-31
Contract Duration: 3,137 days
Daily Burn Rate: $83.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: CONTRACTOR REVIEW TDP TO INCORPORATE
Place of Performance
Location: MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN County, MINNESOTA, 55442, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $261.1 million to ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLC for work described as: CONTRACTOR REVIEW TDP TO INCORPORATE Key points: 1. The contract's value, while substantial, lacks a competitive benchmark due to its sole-source nature. 2. Performance context is limited as the contract spans nearly a decade, making direct comparisons difficult. 3. Risk indicators are elevated due to the absence of competitive pressure to drive down costs. 4. Sector positioning places this within the defense industrial base for explosives manufacturing. 5. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to transfer some cost risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without competitive bids. The $261 million awarded over its duration represents a significant investment in explosives manufacturing. However, the lack of competition means there's no readily available market data to assess if this price represents fair value compared to what could have been achieved through a competitive process. The firm-fixed-price type suggests an attempt to control costs, but the overall value proposition is obscured by the sole-source award.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC, was considered. There is no indication of a competitive solicitation process. This approach bypasses the typical market research and bidding stages, which can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium for this contract due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without multiple bids, there's less incentive for the contractor to offer the lowest possible price.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from a dedicated supplier for essential explosives. This contract ensures the continued availability of critical munitions manufacturing capabilities. The geographic impact is primarily centered around the contractor's facilities in Minnesota. Workforce implications include sustained employment in specialized manufacturing roles within the defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced innovation.
- Sole-source awards can create vendor lock-in, limiting future flexibility.
- Long contract duration without competitive re-evaluation may obscure evolving market prices.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts some cost risk to the contractor.
- Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC is a known entity in defense manufacturing, suggesting some level of established capability.
- The contract supports critical national defense needs for explosives.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense industrial base, specifically the explosives manufacturing sector. This is a niche but critical area for national security, often characterized by high barriers to entry due to specialized knowledge, safety regulations, and capital investment. The market size for such specialized defense manufacturing can be limited, sometimes leading to fewer potential bidders and a greater reliance on incumbent suppliers. Spending in this area is directly tied to defense procurement strategies and geopolitical demands.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor is there information indicating significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The nature of explosives manufacturing often involves large-scale operations and specialized facilities, which may not be conducive to small business participation. The absence of set-asides suggests that the primary focus was on securing the required capabilities from a large, established prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and financial management regulations. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver goods at an agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with fewer public details available compared to competed contracts. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Ammunition Procurement
- Ordnance Manufacturing Contracts
- Defense Industrial Base Support
- Explosives and Chemical Manufacturing
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
- Long contract duration without re-competition
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, explosives-manufacturing, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, minnesota, alliant-techsystems-operations-llc, defense-industrial-base
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $261.1 million to ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLC. CONTRACTOR REVIEW TDP TO INCORPORATE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $261.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-06-30. End: 2015-01-31.
What is Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly on similar sole-source contracts?
Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC, now part of Northrop Grumman, has a long history of contracting with the Department of Defense. While specific details on their sole-source contract performance for explosives manufacturing are not publicly detailed in this data, the company is a major defense contractor with extensive experience in aerospace and defense systems. Their track record generally involves large-scale production and integration. However, the absence of competition for this particular contract means that performance metrics and value assessments are less transparent than they would be for a competed award. Without access to internal DoD performance reviews or specific contract modifications, a comprehensive assessment of their track record on this sole-source award remains limited.
How does the $261 million contract value compare to other federal spending on explosives manufacturing?
Comparing the $261 million contract value to other federal spending on explosives manufacturing is challenging without a broader dataset of similar sole-source or competed contracts. However, this figure represents a significant, long-term investment in a specialized defense capability. Federal spending in this area is typically driven by defense readiness requirements and strategic munitions programs. While this contract alone is substantial, it's likely part of a larger federal strategy for maintaining domestic explosives production capacity. The lack of competitive bidding makes it difficult to ascertain if this represents a market rate or a premium.
What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award of this magnitude for explosives manufacturing?
The primary risks associated with a sole-source award of this magnitude for explosives manufacturing include potential overpricing due to the lack of competitive pressure, reduced incentive for innovation, and vendor lock-in. Without competing bids, the government may not achieve the best possible price or terms. Furthermore, relying on a single supplier can create vulnerabilities in the supply chain if that supplier faces production issues or decides to exit the market. The government also loses the opportunity to foster competition among multiple capable firms, which could lead to more robust market development and technological advancements in the long run. Ensuring quality and timely delivery remains critical, but the absence of competition obscures the value-for-money aspect.
What is the expected program effectiveness and impact of this contract on DoD's capabilities?
The expected program effectiveness of this contract is to ensure a consistent and reliable supply of explosives for the Department of Defense's operational needs. By awarding this contract to Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC, the DoD aims to secure critical manufacturing capabilities essential for national defense. The impact on DoD's capabilities is significant, as it guarantees access to necessary munitions components, thereby supporting readiness and strategic objectives. The long duration and substantial value suggest a commitment to maintaining this capability over an extended period, contributing to the overall robustness of the defense industrial base and the ability to meet future demands for ordnance.
What are the historical spending patterns for explosives manufacturing within the Department of Defense?
Historical spending patterns for explosives manufacturing within the Department of Defense have generally involved significant, long-term investments to maintain domestic production capabilities and ensure supply chain security. Contracts in this sector are often awarded to a limited number of specialized firms due to the high technical requirements, safety regulations, and capital intensity involved. Spending fluctuates based on geopolitical conditions, modernization programs, and operational tempo. While this specific $261 million contract is a large single award, it reflects a broader pattern of sustained federal investment in this critical, albeit niche, defense manufacturing sector. Sole-source awards have historically been utilized when unique capabilities or existing infrastructure necessitate it, though competed contracts are generally preferred for cost efficiency.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing › Explosives Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W15QKN06R0103
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems LLC (UEI: 618705925)
Address: 4700 NATHAN LN N, PLYMOUTH, MN, 55442
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $261,071,312
Exercised Options: $261,071,312
Current Obligation: $261,071,279
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-06-30
Current End Date: 2015-01-31
Potential End Date: 2015-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-04-09
More Contracts from Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC
- Small Caliber Ammunition — $668.1M (Department of Defense)
- Small CAL Requirements — $648.9M (Department of Defense)
- Obligate Funding for the Improved 5.56MM Commercial Pack Phase III (project Execution Phase) — $584.2M (Department of Defense)
- Small Caliber Ammunition (5.56MM, 7.62MM, CAL .22, CAL. 30, CAL .45, CAL .50) — $582.2M (Department of Defense)
- Systems Engineering and Development — $569.0M (Department of Defense)
View all Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)