Treasury's $42.7M Property Management Contract Awarded to VSE Corporation Under Sole-Source Basis

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $42,731,708 ($42.7M)

Contractor: VSE Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2010-10-01

End Date: 2012-10-02

Contract Duration: 732 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MANAGEMENT,STORAGE, AND DISPOSITION OF SEIZED, FORFEITED, AND BLOCKED GENERAL PROPERTY AND CONVEYANCES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20005

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $42.7 million to VSE CORPORATION for work described as: MANAGEMENT,STORAGE, AND DISPOSITION OF SEIZED, FORFEITED, AND BLOCKED GENERAL PROPERTY AND CONVEYANCES Key points: 1. The contract value is $42.7 million for property management services. 2. VSE Corporation, the incumbent, secured this sole-source award. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns. 4. The sector is Other Warehousing and Storage, a niche but essential service.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, while allowing flexibility, offers less incentive for cost control compared to fixed-price contracts. Benchmarking is difficult without detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, raising concerns about whether the government obtained the best possible price and service. Sole-source awards limit price discovery and competitive pressure.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these services.

Public Impact

Citizens rely on efficient management of seized assets to ensure fairness and proper disposal. The services provided are critical for law enforcement and judicial processes. Transparency in sole-source awards is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Other Warehousing and Storage sector, which includes services like inventory control, storage, and disposition of various goods. Benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the specialized nature of seized property.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. Opportunities for small businesses in specialized warehousing and logistics should be explored.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure the contractor is performing efficiently and costs are reasonable. Audits of the cost-plus fixed fee elements are essential.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-warehousing-and-storage, department-of-the-treasury, dc, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $42.7 million to VSE CORPORATION. MANAGEMENT,STORAGE, AND DISPOSITION OF SEIZED, FORFEITED, AND BLOCKED GENERAL PROPERTY AND CONVEYANCES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VSE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $42.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-10-01. End: 2012-10-02.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities or circumstances where competition is not feasible. Without specific documentation, it's difficult to assess the steps taken to ensure fair pricing. However, agencies should conduct market research and price analyses even in sole-source situations to validate reasonableness.

What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract for property management?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts carry risks of cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee. This can reduce the incentive for the contractor to control expenses. For property management, this could lead to inflated storage, handling, or disposition costs if not closely monitored.

How does the lack of competition impact the overall value and effectiveness of this contract for taxpayers?

The lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to achieve the best value. Taxpayers may bear higher costs due to the absence of competitive bidding. Effectiveness could also be impacted if alternative, more innovative solutions were available from other providers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and WarehousingWarehousing and StorageOther Warehousing and Storage

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: A-10-090

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2550 HUNTINGTON AVE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,790,508

Exercised Options: $42,731,708

Current Obligation: $42,731,708

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 171

Total Subaward Amount: $47,859,729

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-10-01

Current End Date: 2012-10-02

Potential End Date: 2012-10-02 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-10-26

More Contracts from VSE Corporation

View all VSE Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending