Treasury's $55M IBM Contract for CDR Development: A Deep Dive into Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $54,970,423 ($55.0M)

Contractor: International Business Machines Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2011-07-14

End Date: 2014-08-25

Contract Duration: 1,138 days

Daily Burn Rate: $48.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: TTN #4015: CDR DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: LANHAM, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20703

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $55.0 million to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION for work described as: TTN #4015: CDR DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Key points: 1. The contract awarded to IBM for CDR development represents a significant investment in IT infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. The contract's duration and cost-plus-fixed-fee structure warrant scrutiny for potential cost overruns. 4. The IT sector, particularly data management and development, is a critical area for government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure can lead to higher costs if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar IT development contracts is difficult without more granular cost data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the specific pricing mechanisms within the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure need careful monitoring to ensure value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for this contract, and the ultimate value depends on the successful delivery of the CDR system and its long-term benefits.

Public Impact

Enhances IRS data processing capabilities, potentially improving taxpayer services and operational efficiency. Supports critical government functions by modernizing essential IT systems. The use of a large, established contractor like IBM may indicate a focus on reliability and expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on software development and data management. Spending in this area is crucial for government modernization, with benchmarks varying widely based on project complexity and technology.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to a large business (IBM) and there is no indication of small business participation. This suggests limited opportunities for small businesses in this specific procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would focus on monitoring the contractor's adherence to the fixed fee, managing the cost elements, and ensuring timely delivery of the CDR system according to specifications.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-computer-related-services, department-of-the-treasury, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $55.0 million to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION. TTN #4015: CDR DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $55.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-07-14. End: 2014-08-25.

What specific performance metrics were established to ensure the CDR system meets the IRS's needs effectively and efficiently?

The provided data does not detail specific performance metrics. Effective oversight would require clear, measurable performance indicators tied to the CDR system's functionality, reliability, and impact on IRS operations. Without these, assessing the contract's true effectiveness is challenging.

How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure compare to alternative contract types for similar IT development projects in terms of overall cost efficiency?

Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts offer flexibility but can be less cost-efficient than fixed-price contracts if costs escalate beyond initial estimates. For IT development, fixed-price or performance-based contracts might offer better cost control, provided the scope is well-defined.

What is the anticipated long-term return on investment for the $55 million spent on the CDR development contract?

The return on investment is tied to the successful implementation and utilization of the CDR system. Potential benefits include improved data analysis, enhanced operational efficiency, better decision-making, and potentially reduced long-term IT maintenance costs. Quantifying this ROI requires post-implementation analysis.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6710 ROCKLEDGE DR, BETHESDA, MD, 20817

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $55,740,695

Exercised Options: $55,740,694

Current Obligation: $54,970,423

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 68

Total Subaward Amount: $6,741,495

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: TIRNO11D00022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-07-14

Current End Date: 2014-08-25

Potential End Date: 2015-09-24 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-07-10

More Contracts from International Business Machines Corporation

View all International Business Machines Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending