DoD's $24.9M Network Centric Solutions Contract Awarded to Peraton Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,941,120 ($24.9M)
Contractor: Peraton Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-01-08
End Date: 2008-08-13
Contract Duration: 583 days
Daily Burn Rate: $42.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: NETWORK CENTRIC SOLUTIONS
Place of Performance
Location: EGLIN AFB, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32542
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.9 million to PERATON INC. for work described as: NETWORK CENTRIC SOLUTIONS Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Peraton Inc. for $24.9 million. 2. Utilized full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. Contract duration was 583 days. 4. The NAICS code 517110 indicates Wired Telecommunications Carriers. 5. The contract was awarded in Florida.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $24.9 million for a 583-day duration appears reasonable for wired telecommunications services. Benchmarking against similar DoD contracts for network infrastructure would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting a competitive process was initiated, but specific sources may have been excluded. This method aims for price discovery through competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by leveraging market forces.
Public Impact
Ensures critical wired telecommunications infrastructure for the Department of the Air Force. Supports military operations and communication networks. Potential impact on the telecommunications services market in Florida.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
- Contract duration is relatively short, potentially leading to frequent re-competition.
- Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes makes value assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
- Contract supports a critical government function (Air Force communications).
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Wired Telecommunications Carriers sector, supporting essential communication infrastructure. Spending in this sector for the DoD is significant, often involving complex network solutions.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract award.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, implying oversight from this agency. Further details on performance monitoring and accountability mechanisms are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Wired Telecommunications Carriers
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for reduced competition due to source exclusion.
- Short contract duration may lead to frequent, costly re-procurements.
- Lack of detailed performance data makes effectiveness assessment challenging.
- The specific nature of 'Wired Telecommunications Carriers' can be broad; clarity on services is needed.
Tags
wired-telecommunications-carriers, department-of-defense, fl, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.9 million to PERATON INC.. NETWORK CENTRIC SOLUTIONS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERATON INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-01-08. End: 2008-08-13.
What was the specific reason for excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process, and did this exclusion impact the final price?
The exclusion of specific sources, even within a full and open competition framework, can potentially limit the breadth of bids received and may influence the final price. Understanding the justification for exclusion is crucial to assess if it was necessary for technical or security reasons, or if it inadvertently reduced competitive pressure and potentially led to a higher cost for the government.
How does the $24.9 million contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar wired telecommunications services over an 18-month period?
Benchmarking the $24.9 million contract value against similar wired telecommunications services procured by government agencies or large commercial entities over an 18-month period is essential. Without comparative data, it's difficult to definitively assess if the price represents good value. Factors like service scope, bandwidth, security requirements, and geographic coverage heavily influence pricing in this sector.
What performance metrics were established for this contract, and how were they monitored to ensure effective service delivery by Peraton Inc.?
The effectiveness of this contract hinges on the established performance metrics and the rigor of their monitoring. Without knowing these metrics (e.g., uptime, latency, security compliance), it's impossible to gauge if Peraton Inc. delivered services effectively. Robust oversight mechanisms, including regular performance reviews and potential penalties for non-compliance, are critical for ensuring taxpayer value and mission success.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Wired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite) › Wired Telecommunications Carriers
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L3harris Technologies, Inc (UEI: 004203337)
Address: 1441 MCCORMICK DR, LARGO, MD, 90
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,941,120
Exercised Options: $24,941,120
Current Obligation: $24,941,120
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA877104D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-01-08
Current End Date: 2008-08-13
Potential End Date: 2008-08-13 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-11-25
More Contracts from Peraton Inc.
- 200107!000034!5700!GZ80 !smc/Pks !F0470101C0001 !A!N!*!Y! !20001103!20061031!052819732!052819732!001216845!n!itt Industries, Inc , Systems !4410 E Fountain Blvd !colorado Sprin !co!80916!16000!041!08!colorado Springs !EL Paso !colorado !+000016429445!n!n!000000000000!ac26!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Mgmt Support !A2 !missile and Space Systems !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!B! !A !Y!R!2!003!B! !A!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $1.7B (Department of Defense)
- THE Exploration and Space Communications Projects Division (ESC) IS a National Resource Located AT Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc) Which Enables Scientific Discovery and Space Exploration by Providing Innovative and Mission-Effective Space Communications and Navigation Solutions to a Large Community of Diverse Customers. ESC Manages Operational Geostationary Communications Relay Satellites and Ground Systems for the Space Communications and Navigation (scan) Program AT Nasa Headquarters. Today, Scan Network Systems Consist of the Space Network (SN), the Near Earth Network (NEN), and the Deep Space Network (DSN). the Day-To-Day Management of These Three Networks IS Currently NOT Fully Consistent. IT IS the Intention of the Government to Unify the SN and NEN Where Practicable Under This Contract Using Integrated, Common Management Practices and Network Solutions — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center's (gsfc) Goal for the Space Communications Networks Services Contract (scns) IS to Enable Mission Success for Every Customer Using Scns Services. KEY Objectives of the Scns Contract ARE to Decrease Cost and Maintain or Improve Operational Efficiency and Reliability, While Maintaining an Acceptable Level of Risk and Providing for Safe Operation of the Missions. the Contractor Shall Implement a Safety, Health, and Mission Assurance Program That Provides a Safe and Healthy Work Environment, Minimizes Program Risk, and Maximizes Nasa Mission Success. the Contractor Shall BE Responsible and Accountable for Achieving the Required Results. Core Requirement Functions, Such AS Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, ETC. ARE Required to Support Idiq Task Orders. the Space Network (SN) IS Comprised of a Fleet of On-Orbit Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (tdrs) and Associated Ground Systems That Provide Telecommunications Services. the Nature of the SN Architecture, I.E., Extremely Large Capital Investment, Contractor Operated Facilities, Continuous 24X7 Requirements, ETC., Lends Itself to a Core Requirements Approach. the Ground Network (GN) Consists of an Orbital Tracking Network and the Satellite Laser Ranging Network. the Nature of the Ground Network Architecture, I.E., Diverse MIX of Commercial and Government Assets, Evolving Geographic and Technical Customer Requirements, and Legacy Systems, ETC. Lends Itself to an Idiq Approach. Other Activities, I.E., Very Long Baseline Interferometry Network Operations and Maintenance (O&M), Electronic System Test Laboratory, Requirements Development, Hardware and Software Development, ETC. ARE Best Suited to an Idiq Approach in the Resource-Constrained Environment That Nasa Operates in — $1.2B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Operational Planning Implementation and Assessment Services (opias) Base Award — $800.8M (General Services Administration)
- Sitec 3 EOM Provides Ussocom With O&M Services to Maintain Netops, Maintain Systems & Network Infrastructure, Provide END User & Common Device Support, Provide Configuration, Change, License, & Asset Mgmt. Conduct Training and Perform Imacs Services — $651.0M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)