DoD's $11.6M contract for professional services awarded to Anteon Corp. shows fair competition and good value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,591,290 ($11.6M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-10-01

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200502!416139!97AS!SP3100!DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION CENTER !GS23F8049H !C!N! !Y!SP310005F0033! !20041001!20041030!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!26496!600!51!FAIRFAX !FAIRFAX (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000005906815!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !562920!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: NEW CUMBERLAND, YORK County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17070

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: 200502!416139!97AS!SP3100!DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION CENTER !GS23F8049H !C!N! !Y!SP310005F0033! !20041001!20041030!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!26496!600!51!FAIRFAX !FAIR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive marketplace. 2. Pricing appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar contracts. 3. No significant risk indicators identified in the contract's performance history. 4. Services provided fall within a common category for professional support. 5. Contractor has a track record of performance in similar government engagements. 6. Spending aligns with broader trends in defense contracting for professional services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $11.6 million over four years appears reasonable for administrative management and general management consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for professional services within the Department of Defense suggests that the pricing is competitive. The firm fixed-price structure also provides cost certainty. While specific performance metrics are not detailed here, the absence of major issues suggests satisfactory value delivery.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring that the government receives competitive pricing. The fact that it was competed openly implies that the agency sought the best value from the market.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that likely drives down costs and ensures the government is not overpaying for essential professional services.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from enhanced administrative and management consulting services. Services delivered likely support operational efficiency and strategic planning within the agency. Geographic impact is primarily within the agency's operational areas, with potential national security implications. Workforce implications include support for government personnel and potential engagement of contractor staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, a significant area of federal spending. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services represents a broad category of support crucial for government operations. Federal spending in this sector often supports strategic planning, organizational efficiency, and specialized expertise that agencies require. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the broader professional services category for the Department of Defense.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses and the data does not indicate any subcontracting requirements. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this specific award. However, larger prime contractors often engage small businesses in their supply chains, though this is not explicitly detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight mechanisms. As a firm fixed-price contract, performance is monitored to ensure deliverables meet requirements. The Department of Defense and the Defense Logistics Agency have established oversight bodies, and the Inspector General's office can investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS.

Related Government Programs

Tags

department-of-defense, defense-logistics-agency, professional-services, administrative-management, general-management-consulting, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, anteon-corporation, virginia, federal-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. 200502!416139!97AS!SP3100!DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION CENTER !GS23F8049H !C!N! !Y!SP310005F0033! !20041001!20041030!067641597!067641597!099312725!N!ANTEON CORPORATION !3211 JERMANTOWN ROAD !FAIRFAX !VA!22030!26496!600!51!FAIRFAX !FAIRFAX (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000005906815!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT !000 !* !562920!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-10-01. End: 2008-09-30.

What is the track record of Anteon Corporation with the federal government?

Anteon Corporation, prior to its acquisition by General Dynamics, had a significant track record with the federal government, particularly within the Department of Defense. They specialized in providing IT and professional services. Their history includes numerous contracts across various agencies, demonstrating experience in delivering complex solutions. While this specific contract was awarded to Anteon, it's important to note that the data indicates General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. as the 'co' (contracting office or parent company at the time of data extraction), suggesting a potential acquisition or merger context. Further investigation into Anteon's historical performance, including any past performance evaluations or disputes, would provide a more complete picture of their reliability as a contractor.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar professional services contracts within the DoD?

The contract value of approximately $11.6 million over a four-year period (October 1, 2004, to September 30, 2008) for administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) appears to be within a reasonable range for the Department of Defense. While specific, directly comparable contracts are not provided in the dataset, the average annual value of roughly $2.9 million is consistent with the cost of specialized consulting support. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract also suggests a degree of cost control. Benchmarking against broader categories of professional services within the DoD, which can range from IT support to strategic planning, indicates that this award is not an outlier in terms of its overall financial commitment.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of contract?

The primary risks associated with this type of firm fixed-price contract for professional services include potential scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined, contractor underperformance if the quality of services does not meet expectations, and the possibility of the contractor lacking the necessary expertise for highly specialized tasks. Given that this is for administrative management and general management consulting, the risk of technical failure is lower than in complex IT development. However, ensuring the effectiveness and efficiency of the consulting advice provided is crucial. The 'full and open competition' aspect mitigates some risk by selecting from a pool of qualified bidders, and the contract duration allows for performance monitoring over time.

How effective are professional services contracts like this in improving agency operations?

The effectiveness of professional services contracts like this hinges on several factors, including the clarity of the SOW (Statement of Work), the expertise of the contractor, and the agency's ability to manage the relationship and integrate the provided services. For administrative management and general management consulting, these contracts can be highly effective in bringing in specialized knowledge, improving organizational efficiency, streamlining processes, and supporting strategic decision-making. When well-executed, they can lead to significant improvements in how an agency operates. However, if the contractor's advice is not actionable or if the agency fails to implement recommendations, the effectiveness can be limited. The 'good' value rating suggests a positive outcome was likely achieved.

What is the historical spending trend for NAICS code 541611 within the Department of Defense?

Historical spending trends for NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) within the Department of Defense (DoD) show a consistent and substantial investment over the years. The DoD is a major consumer of professional services, utilizing consultants for a wide array of functions, including strategic planning, organizational restructuring, process improvement, and management support. Spending in this category typically fluctuates based on defense priorities, budget allocations, and specific needs for external expertise. While this specific $11.6 million contract is a single data point, the overall trend indicates that the DoD relies heavily on these services to maintain operational effectiveness and adapt to evolving challenges. Analyzing broader spending patterns would reveal significant annual outlays in this sector.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 3211 JERMANTOWN RD, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,591,290

Exercised Options: $11,591,290

Current Obligation: $11,591,290

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F8049H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-10-01

Current End Date: 2008-09-30

Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-12-08

More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending