State Department's $107M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $107,222,624 ($107.2M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2003-05-12

End Date: 2016-01-13

Contract Duration: 4,629 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.2K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $107.2 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $107.2 million over its period of performance. 2. Awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating multiple bids were considered. 3. The contract duration of approximately 12.7 years suggests a long-term need for these services. 4. Services fall under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330), a critical sector for government operations. 5. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability. 6. Contractor, MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., has secured a significant portion of the total award value.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award of $107.2 million over nearly 13 years averages to approximately $8.2 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for comparable engineering services contracts within the Department of State or similar agencies, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to manage costs, but the long duration could introduce risks if market rates for engineering services change significantly. Further analysis would require comparing the scope of services and deliverables to other contracts of similar scale and duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER,' suggesting that it was competed under a broader contract vehicle where multiple vendors could bid. The presence of a competitive award implies that the agency sought proposals from various qualified sources. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated in the provided data, but the 'competitive' nature indicates more than one offer was likely received, which generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more favorable pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of State, which receives essential engineering services to support its operations. These services likely contribute to the maintenance, development, or enhancement of infrastructure, systems, or facilities critical to diplomatic and operational functions. The geographic impact is centered in Washington D.C., where the contract is registered. The contract supports specialized engineering roles, potentially impacting the workforce within the engineering and technical services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 12 years) may lead to cost overruns if market conditions change unfavorably.
Lack of specific performance metrics or detailed scope of work in the provided data makes it difficult to assess true value.
Reliance on a single contractor for an extended period could reduce flexibility and responsiveness to evolving needs.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value and quality.
Firm-fixed-price contract type helps in budget predictability and cost control.
The contractor has secured a substantial award, indicating confidence in their capabilities.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services (NAICS 541330) represent a significant segment of the professional services market, encompassing a wide range of activities from design and consulting to project management and technical support. Government agencies, particularly those with extensive infrastructure and complex operational needs like the Department of State, are major consumers of these services. The market is characterized by a mix of large, established firms and smaller, specialized companies. This contract, valued at over $100 million, falls into the large-scale procurement category within this sector.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits for the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. The focus appears to be on larger, established firms capable of handling the scale and duration of this engineering services requirement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of State. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services at an agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General of the Department of State would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of State Facilities Management Contracts
Engineering and Technical Services for Government Agencies
Professional Services Contracts
Infrastructure Support Services

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of cost escalation or obsolescence.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data hinders full value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $107.2 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $107.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-05-12. End: 2016-01-13.

What is the specific scope of engineering services provided under this contract?

The provided data identifies the contract under NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) and notes the awardee as MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. However, the specific details of the engineering services required, such as whether they pertain to facilities, IT infrastructure, security systems, or other operational needs, are not detailed in the summary data. A comprehensive understanding would necessitate reviewing the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). This would clarify the deliverables, technical requirements, and the precise nature of the engineering support the Department of State is procuring over the contract's extensive duration.

How does the $107.2 million award compare to typical engineering service contracts for the Department of State?

The $107.2 million award represents a substantial investment in engineering services over its approximately 12.7-year lifespan. To benchmark this, one would need to analyze historical spending patterns for similar engineering services procured by the Department of State and other federal agencies with comparable operational footprints. Factors such as the contract type (firm-fixed-price), the specific services rendered (e.g., design, construction oversight, systems engineering), and the duration are crucial for comparison. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state whether this award is high, low, or average. However, its scale suggests it covers significant, long-term engineering requirements.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the contractor's performance?

The provided summary data does not explicitly list the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for engineering services contracts, KPIs might include adherence to project timelines, quality of deliverables (e.g., design accuracy, compliance with standards), cost control within the fixed-price framework, responsiveness to task orders, and overall client satisfaction. The effectiveness of oversight mechanisms and the clarity of the Statement of Work (SOW) are critical for defining and measuring these KPIs. Performance evaluations would likely be conducted periodically throughout the contract's long duration.

What is the track record of MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of State?

MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. has secured a significant federal contract with the Department of State valued at $107.2 million. To assess their track record, a review of their past performance on similar government contracts would be necessary. This would involve examining contract histories for on-time delivery, quality of work, adherence to budget (especially relevant for fixed-price contracts), and any past performance issues or awards. Their ability to win a large, long-term competitive contract suggests a positive history, but a deeper dive into specific past performance evaluations and contract outcomes would provide a more complete picture.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as cost overruns or performance deficiencies?

While the firm-fixed-price contract type aims to mitigate cost overrun risks, the extended duration of nearly 13 years presents inherent uncertainties. Market fluctuations in labor costs, material prices, and technological advancements could potentially strain the fixed price over such a long period, although the contractor bears the primary risk. Performance deficiencies are always a risk with any contract; however, the competitive award suggests the agency selected a vendor believed capable of meeting requirements. Robust oversight, clear performance metrics, and defined remedies for non-performance are crucial to managing these risks throughout the contract's lifecycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation ID: SLMAQM03Q0065

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation (UEI: 053518312)

Address: 12015 LEE JACKSON HWY, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $204,207,388

Exercised Options: $204,207,386

Current Obligation: $107,222,624

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F0122J

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline