State Department awarded $25.7M for hardened trailer systems, completed on time and within budget

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,715,128 ($25.7M)

Contractor: Perini Management Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2014-03-27

End Date: 2018-07-19

Contract Duration: 1,575 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCUTION AND INSTALLATION OF HARDENED ALTERNATIVE TRAILER SYSTEMS

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $25.7 million to PERINI MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCUTION AND INSTALLATION OF HARDENED ALTERNATIVE TRAILER SYSTEMS Key points: 1. Contract achieved strong value for money, with final cost aligning closely with initial estimates. 2. Full and open competition likely contributed to competitive pricing. 3. No significant risk indicators were identified during the contract performance period. 4. Project was completed within the planned duration, indicating effective project management. 5. This contract falls within the broader construction and installation sector for government facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The final award amount of $25.7 million for the hardened alternative trailer systems appears reasonable given the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar construction projects for specialized government facilities suggests that this price point is competitive. The firm fixed-price contract type also indicates that the contractor assumed the majority of the cost risk, which can be beneficial for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives the best value. The specific number of bidders was not detailed, but the process itself indicates a robust marketplace was engaged.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of State personnel who will utilize the hardened alternative trailer systems for operational needs. The services delivered include the construction and installation of specialized, secure facilities. The geographic impact is likely concentrated at the specific locations where these trailer systems are deployed by the State Department. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers, project managers, and specialized technicians involved in the fabrication and installation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Contract completed within the awarded duration.
Final cost aligned with initial estimates, suggesting good budget management.
Firm Fixed Price contract type indicates cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract is situated within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a broad category encompassing the building of non-residential structures. The market for specialized government facilities, particularly those requiring hardening and security, is a niche within this larger sector. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other construction contracts for secure or temporary government infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, though larger prime contractors may engage small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer at the Department of State. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor regarding cost. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS.

Related Government Programs

Department of State Facilities Construction
Government Secure Infrastructure Projects
Temporary and Mobile Office Solutions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $25.7 million to PERINI MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCUTION AND INSTALLATION OF HARDENED ALTERNATIVE TRAILER SYSTEMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERINI MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-03-27. End: 2018-07-19.

What is the track record of Perini Management Services, Inc. with the Department of State?

Perini Management Services, Inc. has a history of performing various construction and facility management services for government agencies, including the Department of State. Their past performance with the State Department would typically be documented in past performance evaluations during the bidding process for new contracts. While this specific contract was completed successfully, a comprehensive review would involve examining other contracts to assess consistency in performance, adherence to schedules, and cost control across their portfolio with the agency. Information on their specific track record can often be found in contract award databases and performance review systems.

How does the cost of these hardened trailer systems compare to similar government procurements?

Benchmarking the cost of these hardened trailer systems against similar government procurements is challenging without access to detailed specifications and scope of work for comparable contracts. However, the final award amount of $25.7 million for a project with a duration of 1575 days (approximately 4.3 years) suggests a significant investment in specialized infrastructure. Factors such as security features, material durability, and site-specific installation requirements would influence the cost. Generally, firm-fixed-price contracts awarded under full and open competition, as this one was, tend to yield competitive pricing. Further analysis would require identifying contracts for similar hardened facilities or mobile command centers procured by other federal agencies.

What were the primary risks associated with the construction and installation of these hardened trailer systems?

The primary risks associated with the construction and installation of hardened trailer systems typically include logistical challenges in transporting and assembling specialized units, potential delays due to weather or site preparation issues, and ensuring compliance with stringent security and hardening requirements. For this specific contract, the firm-fixed-price structure placed the cost overrun risk on the contractor, Perini Management Services, Inc. The successful completion within the planned duration and budget suggests that these risks were effectively managed by both the contractor and the Department of State's oversight. Potential risks could also involve the availability of specialized materials or skilled labor, which would need to be proactively addressed by the contractor.

How effective was the Department of State in managing this contract to ensure value for taxpayer money?

The Department of State demonstrated effective contract management by awarding this contract under full and open competition, which fosters competitive pricing. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifted cost risk to the contractor. Furthermore, the project's completion within the scheduled duration and without apparent cost overruns (final cost closely matching award amount) indicates successful oversight and performance management. These factors collectively suggest that the Department of State managed this contract efficiently to ensure value for taxpayer money, achieving the desired outcome within the allocated budget and timeframe.

What is the historical spending pattern for hardened alternative trailer systems by the Department of State?

Analyzing the historical spending pattern for hardened alternative trailer systems by the Department of State requires a broader look at their procurement data over several years. This specific contract, awarded in 2014 and completed in 2018 for $25.7 million, represents a significant investment in such infrastructure during that period. Without access to a comprehensive database of all State Department procurements for similar systems, it's difficult to establish a definitive spending pattern. However, the need for secure and deployable facilities suggests that such procurements may be recurring, especially for overseas operations or temporary assignments. Future analysis would involve tracking similar contracts awarded in subsequent years to identify trends in spending and technology adoption.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tutor Perini Corporation (UEI: 006954432)

Address: 73 MOUNT WAYTE AVE, FRAMINGHAM, MA, 01702

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,715,128

Exercised Options: $25,715,128

Current Obligation: $25,715,128

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $25,000

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(F)

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SAQMMA11D0023

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline