State Department's $12.8M IT infrastructure contract to CSRA LLC shows fair value with 4 bidders

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,799,363 ($12.8M)

Contractor: Csra LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2008-02-01

End Date: 2016-08-17

Contract Duration: 3,120 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.1K/day

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: ENM GTS - DELIVERY ORDER UNDER USAID PRIME 3.2 - ASSIST WITH MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF IT INFRASTRUCTURE (BELTSVILLE)

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGFIELD, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22153

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $12.8 million to CSRA LLC for work described as: ENM GTS - DELIVERY ORDER UNDER USAID PRIME 3.2 - ASSIST WITH MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF IT INFRASTRUCTURE (BELTSVILLE) Key points: 1. The contract provided IT infrastructure management and operations, indicating a need for specialized support. 2. With four bidders, the competition level suggests a moderately competitive market for these services. 3. The contract duration of over 8 years (3120 days) points to a long-term need and potential for sustained service. 4. The Time and Materials pricing structure can pose risks if not closely managed, potentially leading to cost overruns. 5. The contract was awarded to CSRA LLC, a significant player in the federal IT services sector. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 suggests a broad category of IT services. 7. The contract's performance period spanned from 2008 to 2016, reflecting past IT support requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total value of $12.8 million over more than 8 years suggests a moderate annual spend for IT infrastructure support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for IT operations and maintenance services indicates that this pricing falls within a reasonable range, though specific performance metrics and the exact scope of services would be needed for a more precise valuation. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model, while flexible, can sometimes lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed diligently. The number of bids received (4) suggests a degree of market interest, which can help in achieving competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under a full and open solicitation, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. Four bids were received, suggesting a reasonable level of competition for these IT infrastructure services. A moderate number of bidders generally allows for price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive terms, though a higher number of bidders could potentially drive prices down further.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition with four bidders likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award, as it allowed market forces to influence pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract were the Department of State, receiving essential IT infrastructure support. The services delivered included the management and operation of IT infrastructure, ensuring continuity and reliability of critical systems. The contract was geographically focused on Beltsville, Maryland, indicating a specific operational site requirement. The contract supported the IT workforce by engaging a contractor to perform these specialized functions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) services sector, specifically focusing on IT infrastructure management and operations. The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies consistently seeking support for maintaining and modernizing their complex systems. Comparable spending benchmarks for IT operations and maintenance can vary widely based on the scope, complexity, and criticality of the infrastructure supported. The broad NAICS code 541519 covers a range of computer-related services, indicating this contract was for general IT support rather than highly specialized niche services.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract included small business set-asides, as the 'ss' field is false. Similarly, the 'sb' field being false suggests no explicit requirement for subcontracting to small businesses was mandated within this specific award. This means the primary contractor, CSRA LLC, likely performed the majority of the work with its own resources or subcontracted based on its own business decisions, potentially limiting direct opportunities for small businesses within this particular contract's framework.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been primarily managed by the Department of State contracting officers and program managers responsible for the IT infrastructure at the Beltsville location. As a delivery order under a prime contract, the oversight mechanisms would align with the terms of the parent contract. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, which provide basic information on contract value, duration, and parties involved. Specific performance oversight details are typically internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, department-of-state, virginia, delivery-order, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, it-infrastructure, computer-related-services, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $12.8 million to CSRA LLC. ENM GTS - DELIVERY ORDER UNDER USAID PRIME 3.2 - ASSIST WITH MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF IT INFRASTRUCTURE (BELTSVILLE)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSRA LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-02-01. End: 2016-08-17.

What was the specific scope of IT infrastructure managed under this contract?

The contract, "ENM GTS - DELIVERY ORDER UNDER USAID PRIME 3.2 - ASSIST WITH MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF IT INFRASTRUCTURE (BELTSVILLE)", indicates a focus on the management and operation of IT infrastructure. While the specific details of the infrastructure are not provided in the summary data, typical services under such a contract would include network management, server administration, data center operations, cybersecurity support, help desk services, and potentially the maintenance of hardware and software systems. The location specified as Beltsville suggests these services were likely for a particular facility or set of facilities operated by the Department of State or an associated agency.

How does the per-year cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar IT infrastructure services?

The total contract value was approximately $12.8 million over a period of 3120 days, which is roughly 8.5 years. This equates to an average annual spend of approximately $1.5 million. Benchmarking this figure requires detailed comparison with industry data for IT infrastructure management and operations, considering factors like the size and complexity of the infrastructure, the specific services rendered (e.g., network, servers, security, help desk), and the geographic location. Generally, federal IT infrastructure support costs can range significantly, but an average annual spend of $1.5 million for a dedicated operational site might be considered moderate, assuming a substantial scope of services. Without more granular data on the scope and service levels, a precise comparison is challenging, but it does not appear to be an outlier based on the limited information.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate CSRA LLC's performance under this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that were used to evaluate CSRA LLC's performance. Typically, for IT infrastructure management contracts, KPIs would focus on metrics such as system uptime and availability, response times for service requests and incidents, resolution times for issues, security compliance rates, and user satisfaction. The Department of State would have established these KPIs in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) to ensure the contractor met the required service levels. The success of the contract would be measured against these predefined metrics, and any deviations could lead to contract modifications or penalties.

What is the historical spending trend for similar IT infrastructure support services at the Department of State?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for similar IT infrastructure support services at the Department of State requires access to comprehensive historical contract data. This specific contract (valued at $12.8M over 8.5 years) represents a portion of the department's overall IT expenditure. To understand trends, one would need to examine spending patterns over multiple fiscal years, identify recurring needs for infrastructure management, and track whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable. Factors influencing these trends include technological advancements, evolving security threats, agency growth or consolidation, and shifts in IT strategy (e.g., cloud migration). This single contract provides a snapshot but not a trend.

Were there any significant contract modifications or disputes associated with this delivery order?

The provided summary data does not contain information regarding specific contract modifications or disputes related to this delivery order. Contract modifications are common and can adjust scope, schedule, or price. Disputes can arise from disagreements over contract terms, performance, or payments. To determine if significant modifications or disputes occurred, one would need to consult the contract's official file or modification history, which is typically maintained by the contracting agency. The absence of readily available information on disputes does not necessarily mean none occurred, but it suggests no major, publicly documented conflicts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Contractor Details

Address: 3170 FAIRVIEW PARK DR, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,986,693

Exercised Options: $12,799,363

Current Obligation: $12,799,363

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F4381G

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-02-01

Current End Date: 2016-08-17

Potential End Date: 2016-08-17 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-08-17

More Contracts from Csra LLC

View all Csra LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of State Contracts

View all Department of State contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending