DoD awards $30.8M for Aircraft Parts to URS Federal Services Inc. under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,800,017 ($30.8M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-28

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,068 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73110

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.8 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract Value: $30.8 million over 3 years. 2. Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc. 3. Agency: Department of Defense (DCMA). 4. Competition: Full and Open Competition. 5. Contract Type: Time and Materials.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded on a Time and Materials basis, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The awarded value of $30.8 million for 1068 days suggests a moderate daily rate, but without specific unit costs or labor rates, a precise value assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing, although the Time and Materials pricing structure may limit the extent of savings.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is positive for taxpayers, as it aims to secure the best possible price through market forces. However, the Time and Materials contract type requires diligent oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable.

Public Impact

Ensures availability of critical aircraft parts for defense operations. Supports URS Federal Services Inc. and its supply chain. Potential for cost increases due to Time and Materials contract type. Requires robust oversight from DCMA to manage contractor performance and costs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining military readiness. Benchmarks for similar contracts are difficult to ascertain without more granular data on the specific parts and services procured.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The prime contractor, URS Federal Services Inc., is likely a large business, suggesting that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist but are not explicitly detailed in this award.

Oversight & Accountability

The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) is responsible for oversight. Given the Time and Materials contract type, DCMA's role in monitoring labor hours, material costs, and overall performance is critical to ensuring the government receives good value and controls expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ok, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.8 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-28. End: 2008-09-30.

What is the average per-unit cost for the key aircraft parts being procured under this contract, and how does it compare to market rates?

The provided data lacks specific details on the individual aircraft parts or their quantities, making it impossible to determine average per-unit costs. A Time and Materials contract focuses on labor and material costs incurred. To assess value, a comparison of these incurred costs against industry benchmarks for similar parts and labor would be necessary, requiring access to more detailed contract line item data.

What are the primary risks associated with the Time and Materials contract type for this specific procurement, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

The primary risk of a Time and Materials contract is the potential for cost escalation without a defined ceiling, as the contractor is reimbursed for actual labor and material costs plus a fee. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust government oversight, detailed tracking of hours and materials, establishing labor rate ceilings, and clear performance expectations to prevent scope creep and ensure efficiency.

How effectively does the full and open competition process ensure optimal pricing and contractor performance for specialized aircraft parts manufacturing?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize price discovery by allowing all responsible sources to bid, theoretically leading to the lowest price for the required quality. For specialized parts, its effectiveness depends on the clarity of the solicitation's technical requirements and the government's ability to evaluate complex proposals. While it promotes competition, the Time and Materials structure still necessitates vigilant oversight to realize the full cost-saving potential.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENTMODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-10-28

Current End Date: 2008-09-30

Potential End Date: 2008-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-01-31

More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.

View all URS Federal Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending