DoD awards $37.2M for aircraft structural components, with URS Federal Services as incumbent
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $37,263,234 ($37.3M)
Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-10-01
End Date: 2011-03-10
Contract Duration: 2,717 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200403!000035!5700!GE35 !OO-ALC/PKC/LCK !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !Y!QP07 ! !20031001!20040930!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!48350!109!40!MIDWEST CITY !OKLAHOMA !OKLAHOMA !+000000730000!N!N!000000000000!K015!MODIFICATION OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!004!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!A!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73110
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $37.3 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: 200403!000035!5700!GE35 !OO-ALC/PKC/LCK !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !Y!QP07 ! !20031001!20040930!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!48350!109!40!MIDWEST CITY !OKLA… Key points: 1. Contract value is substantial at $37.2M. 2. URS Federal Services is the incumbent contractor. 3. Risk is moderate due to contract type and duration. 4. Sector is Defense, specifically aircraft parts manufacturing.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $37.2M for aircraft structural components appears reasonable given the 8-year duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized aircraft parts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is expected to yield fair pricing, maximizing taxpayer value for these critical aircraft components.
Public Impact
Ensures continued availability of essential aircraft structural components for the Department of Defense. Supports jobs within the aerospace manufacturing sector. Maintains readiness of military aircraft through component sustainment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (8 years) could lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Time and Materials contract type can incentivize increased effort rather than efficiency.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
- Incumbent contractor has existing knowledge and infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting the manufacturing and maintenance of aircraft structural components. Spending in this area is critical for military readiness and can be benchmarked against historical procurement data for similar parts and services.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, with oversight likely provided by the Defense Contract Management Agency. The duration and value suggest a need for robust oversight to ensure performance and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration.
- Time and Materials contract type.
- Potential for cost overruns.
- Reliance on incumbent contractor may limit innovation.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ok, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $37.3 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. 200403!000035!5700!GE35 !OO-ALC/PKC/LCK !F3460197D0423 !A!N! !Y!QP07 ! !20031001!20040930!020205527!073871048!175406842!N!LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC !2701 LIBERTY PARKWAY SUITE!MIDWEST CITY !OK!73110!48350!109!40!MIDWEST CITY !OKLAHOMA !OKLAHOMA !+000000730000!N!N!000000000000!K015!MODIFICATION OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !* !336413!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $37.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-10-01. End: 2011-03-10.
What is the specific nature of the 'MODIFICATION OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS' and how does it differ from previous contracts?
The 'MODIFICATION OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS' likely refers to upgrades, repairs, or the manufacturing of new structural components for aircraft. The specific modifications would depend on the technical requirements outlined in the contract's statement of work. Understanding these details is crucial for assessing if the contract represents new capabilities or ongoing sustainment efforts.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and how will they be measured to ensure effectiveness?
Key performance indicators for this contract would likely focus on component quality, on-time delivery, and adherence to technical specifications. Measurement methods would involve rigorous testing, inspection reports, and delivery tracking. Effective oversight would ensure these KPIs are met, directly impacting aircraft readiness and safety.
Given the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, what mechanisms are in place to control costs and prevent scope creep?
T&M contracts require strong government oversight to manage costs. Mechanisms include detailed labor hour tracking, pre-negotiated labor rates, and strict limits on material costs. A defined ceiling price and clear change order procedures are essential to prevent uncontrolled scope expansion and ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT › MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)
Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-10-01
Current End Date: 2011-03-10
Potential End Date: 2011-03-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-10-01
More Contracts from URS Federal Services Inc.
- Federal Contract — $282.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $255.4M (Department of Defense)
- Rotary Wing Flight Training Services, Fort Rucker, AL — $254.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE Award of a Time and Materials Task Order Under ITS Multiple Award Schedule Contract Number Gs-10f-0038m for Aircraft Maintenance and Modification Services — $142.3M (General Services Administration)
- Request for Proposal for Logistics Support A-76 Study — $114.6M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)