DoD's $23.3M C-130 Parts Contract Awarded to URS Federal Services Inc. for Aircraft Support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,273,916 ($23.3M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-10-01

End Date: 2010-09-16

Contract Duration: 1,446 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Defense

Official Description: LABOR- C-130

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73110

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.3 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: LABOR- C-130 Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of approximately 4 years indicates a medium-term need for services. 3. The award to URS Federal Services Inc. represents a significant commitment to a single prime contractor. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336413 points to specialized aircraft parts manufacturing. 5. The contract's 'OK' status suggests satisfactory performance or administrative standing. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags indicates a focus on larger, established firms for this requirement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns. The total award amount of $23.3 million over roughly four years suggests an average annual spend of approximately $5.8 million. This figure needs to be compared against the cost of similar C-130 parts and support services from other providers or historical contracts to determine if it represents good value for money. The lack of detailed cost-type information or specific deliverables makes a precise value assessment difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 9 bidders suggests a reasonably competitive environment for this requirement. A higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. The fact that multiple companies vied for this contract implies that the market for C-130 parts and related services is active.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages competitive pricing and potentially leads to cost savings compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Department of Defense, ensuring the continued operational readiness of its C-130 aircraft fleet. Services delivered include the provision of aircraft parts and potentially related support for C-130 military transport planes. The geographic impact is likely centered around military bases and maintenance depots where C-130s are operated and serviced. Workforce implications may include jobs in manufacturing, logistics, and technical support roles within URS Federal Services Inc. and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if pricing models are not tightly managed.
Risk of supply chain disruptions affecting parts availability.
Dependence on a single prime contractor could lead to reduced leverage in future negotiations.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating market validation of pricing and capabilities.
Contract status 'OK' suggests satisfactory performance to date.
The existence of multiple bidders points to a healthy competitive landscape for these services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on aircraft parts. The market for military aircraft components is characterized by high technical specifications, stringent quality control, and long product lifecycles. Spending in this area is driven by the need to maintain aging fleets and support ongoing military operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for C-130 parts or similar military aircraft sustainment programs.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that this was not a small business set-aside, and the 'sb' field is false. This suggests that the primary award was made to a large business, URS Federal Services Inc. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data snippet. However, large prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized components or services, so there may be indirect opportunities for small businesses within the supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), as indicated by the 'sa' field. DCMA is responsible for ensuring contractor compliance with contract terms, quality standards, and delivery schedules. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract's performance clauses and payment schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS-NG, which provide public access to contract details, though specific performance data may be restricted.

Related Government Programs

C-130 Hercules Sustainment Programs
Military Aircraft Parts Procurement
Defense Logistics and Maintenance Contracts
Aerospace Manufacturing Support

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions.
Risk of price increases in future contract modifications or renewals.
Dependence on a single supplier for critical components.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.3 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. LABOR- C-130

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-10-01. End: 2010-09-16.

What is the historical spending trend for C-130 parts and support by the Department of Defense?

Analyzing historical spending trends for C-130 parts and support requires access to comprehensive contract databases over multiple fiscal years. Generally, spending on legacy aircraft like the C-130 tends to remain relatively stable or increase gradually as the fleet ages and requires more maintenance and replacement parts. Factors influencing spending include operational tempo, aircraft utilization rates, and the availability of new technologies or upgraded components. Without specific historical data for this contract vehicle or similar ones, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but sustained investment is typical for maintaining such a critical asset.

How does the per-unit cost of parts under this contract compare to commercial aviation equivalents?

Directly comparing per-unit costs between military and commercial aviation parts is complex due to differing specifications, quality assurance requirements, and production volumes. Military-grade components often undergo more rigorous testing and certification, leading to higher costs. Furthermore, the C-130 is a specialized military transport aircraft, and its parts may not have direct commercial equivalents. While commercial aviation benefits from economies of scale and broader market competition, military contracts often prioritize reliability and specific performance characteristics over pure cost minimization. A detailed analysis would require identifying specific part numbers and comparing their military procurement cost against any available commercial counterparts, accounting for differences in specifications and certifications.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate URS Federal Services Inc.'s performance on this contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a contract like this typically revolve around timely delivery of parts, adherence to quality standards, and cost control. Specific KPIs might include on-time delivery rates (e.g., percentage of orders delivered by the required date), defect rates (e.g., number of non-conforming parts per million), and compliance with technical specifications. The contract likely includes clauses for remedies or penalties if these KPIs are not met. The 'OK' status in the contract data suggests that performance has generally met expectations, but the precise KPIs and their thresholds are usually detailed within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and Performance Work Statement (PWS), which are not publicly available in this data.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the overall C-130 fleet readiness?

This contract plays a direct role in supporting the readiness of the C-130 fleet by ensuring the availability of necessary parts. The timely and reliable supply of components is critical for minimizing aircraft downtime due to maintenance or repairs. A well-executed contract that provides high-quality parts on schedule contributes positively to fleet readiness, allowing the DoD to maintain the operational capacity of its C-130 aircraft for transport and other missions. Conversely, any disruptions in supply or quality issues could negatively impact readiness levels.

Are there any known issues with URS Federal Services Inc.'s past performance on similar defense contracts?

Assessing URS Federal Services Inc.'s past performance requires a review of their contract history, including any past performance evaluations, awards, or disputes. The 'st' and 'sn' fields indicating 'OK' for status and 'OKLAHOMA' for location suggest that, as of the data's recording, there were no major outstanding issues flagged. However, a comprehensive review would involve examining contractor performance assessment reporting (CPARs) and any publicly available records of contract disputes or terminations. Without access to these detailed performance records, it's difficult to definitively state whether there have been significant past performance issues.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,273,916

Exercised Options: $23,273,916

Current Obligation: $23,273,916

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F3460197D0423

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline