OPM's $31.5M administrative consulting contract with NETSTAR-1 awarded in 2006, expiring in 2009

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,468,681 ($31.5M)

Contractor: Netstar-1 Government Consulting, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Office of Personnel Management

Start Date: 2006-11-07

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,058 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29.7K/day

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20415

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Office of Personnel Management obligated $31.5 million to NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract value of $31.5 million over approximately 3 years suggests a significant investment in administrative management consulting. 2. The award was made to NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, INC., indicating a specific vendor relationship for these services. 3. The contract duration of 1058 days (approx. 3 years) provides a substantial period for service delivery and performance evaluation. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to services related to administrative management and general management consulting. 5. The contract was awarded by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), a key agency for federal human capital management. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests this contract was not specifically targeted for small business participation. 7. The contract type is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), which is a simplified way to fill anticipated repetitive needs for supplies or services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more granular data on the specific services rendered and their impact. However, a $31.5 million expenditure over three years for administrative consulting services by OPM indicates a substantial investment. Without comparable contract data for similar consulting services at OPM or other agencies during that period, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. The per-unit cost is not calculable without knowing the quantity of services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition level for this contract is not explicitly detailed in the provided data. As a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), the underlying competition can vary. BPAs are typically established against existing indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts or through other competitive means. However, the specific method used to establish this particular BPA and the number of bidders involved are not specified. This lack of transparency makes it challenging to assess the effectiveness of the competition in driving favorable pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. Robust competition generally leads to better pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions. If this BPA was established through limited competition, taxpayers may have paid a premium for the services.

Public Impact

Federal agencies, particularly OPM, likely benefited from enhanced administrative and management consulting services, potentially improving operational efficiency. The services delivered aimed to support OPM's mission in managing federal personnel and human capital. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where OPM is headquartered. The contract supported the workforce of NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, INC., contributing to employment in the consulting sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition information hinders assessment of optimal taxpayer value.
The significant dollar amount over a relatively short period warrants scrutiny of service delivery and outcomes.
Absence of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to gauge the effectiveness of the consulting services.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded to a specific entity, suggesting a focused relationship for service delivery.
The duration of the contract allowed for sustained support and potential for long-term impact.
The use of a BPA mechanism can streamline procurement for recurring needs.

Sector Analysis

Administrative management and general management consulting services represent a significant segment of the professional services market. Federal agencies frequently procure these services to improve efficiency, implement new policies, and manage complex projects. The market is characterized by a mix of large, established firms and smaller, specialized consultancies. Spending benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on the scope, duration, and complexity of the engagement, as well as the specific expertise required.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate that this contract was a small business set-aside. Furthermore, there is no information regarding subcontracting plans or actual performance related to small businesses. This suggests that the primary awardee was likely not a small business, and the contract may not have directly contributed to the small business contracting goals unless subcontracting occurred without explicit set-aside provisions.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Office of Personnel Management. Accountability would be tied to the terms and conditions of the Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) and any task orders issued under it. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management Consulting
General Management Consulting Services
Office of Personnel Management Contracts
Blanket Purchase Agreements

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed competition information.
Absence of defined performance metrics.
Limited transparency on specific services rendered.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Office of Personnel Management awarded $31.5 million to NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Office of Personnel Management (Office of Personnel Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-11-07. End: 2009-09-30.

What specific administrative and management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 541611, which covers Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. However, the specific services rendered are not detailed. Typically, such services can include areas like organizational structure analysis, process improvement, strategic planning, human capital management consulting, IT strategy, and policy development. For OPM, these services could have been focused on improving the efficiency of federal HR processes, implementing new personnel policies, or enhancing the agency's internal operations. Without access to task orders or statements of work, the precise nature of the services remains unspecified.

How does the $31.5 million contract value compare to similar consulting contracts awarded by OPM or other federal agencies during the same period?

Comparing the $31.5 million contract value requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurement during the 2006-2009 period. However, for a three-year duration, this represents a substantial investment in consulting services. Agencies like OPM often engage consultants for specialized expertise or to manage large-scale projects. Without specific benchmarks for comparable administrative consulting engagements at OPM or agencies of similar size and function (e.g., other HR-focused or civilian agencies), it's challenging to definitively state if this was high, low, or average. The nature of the services (general vs. highly specialized) would also influence cost.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include information on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or specific success metrics established for this contract. Typically, for consulting engagements, KPIs would be defined in the Statement of Work (SOW) or task orders and could relate to project completion timelines, cost savings achieved, efficiency improvements measured by specific metrics, successful implementation of recommendations, or client satisfaction. The absence of this information makes it difficult to objectively assess the contractor's performance and the overall value delivered to OPM.

What was the track record of NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, INC. with federal contracts prior to and during this period?

Information regarding NETSTAR-1 GOVERNMENT CONSULTING, INC.'s prior federal contracting history is not included in the provided data snippet. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any past performance issues. Understanding their experience with similar types of consulting services and their success rate with other federal agencies would provide context for their ability to successfully execute this $31.5 million OPM contract. Without this historical data, their track record remains unknown.

What is the typical cost range for administrative management consulting services provided to federal agencies of OPM's size?

The cost range for administrative management consulting services can vary significantly based on the specific services, duration, complexity, and the level of expertise required. For federal agencies like OPM, hourly rates for senior consultants can range from $150 to over $400, depending on specialization and firm size. Project-based or fixed-fee arrangements are also common. A $31.5 million contract over approximately three years ($10.5 million annually) suggests a significant scope of work, potentially involving multiple consultants and extensive project management. This annual figure is within the plausible range for large-scale consulting engagements in the federal sector, but a precise benchmark requires detailed comparison of service scope.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Netstar-1 Inc. (UEI: 024234004)

Address: 5575 SEMINARY RD APT 315, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: OPMBPA490500002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline