DoD's $19.4M PMW 770 Program Management Support Contract Awarded to CSA Global LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,431,759 ($19.4M)

Contractor: CSA Global LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-10-01

End Date: 2017-02-13

Contract Duration: 1,962 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: PMW 770 ACQUISITION/PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23462

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.4 million to CSA GLOBAL LLC for work described as: PMW 770 ACQUISITION/PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1962 days indicates a long-term need for program management services. 3. The award was a delivery order, implying it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to engineering services, a critical component of defense acquisition. 5. The contract was awarded to CSA Global LLC, a private entity, for specialized support. 6. The contract's value of approximately $19.4 million over its term warrants scrutiny for cost-effectiveness.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific details on the scope of services and deliverables. However, the total award amount of $19.4 million over nearly five years suggests an average annual cost of approximately $4 million. This figure needs to be compared against similar program management support contracts within the Department of Defense to assess if it represents a reasonable investment for the services rendered. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract type can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed tightly, as contractor incentives are aligned with cost incurrence.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The fact that there were 5 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific delivery order. While multiple bidders are positive, the specific number (5) should be evaluated in the context of the total number of potential qualified firms in the market for such specialized program management support services.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation, leading to better value for public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and its various programs requiring acquisition and program management expertise. The services delivered are crucial for the efficient planning, execution, and oversight of defense acquisition programs. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the Defense Contract Management Agency's operational areas and the specific program offices supported. The contract supports a specialized workforce of program managers and acquisition professionals, potentially including subject matter experts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The defense sector relies heavily on specialized engineering and program management services to navigate complex acquisition processes. This contract falls within the broader engineering services market, which is a significant component of federal spending. The market for program management support is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in areas like logistics, systems engineering, and project oversight. The value of this contract, approximately $19.4 million, is moderate within the context of large-scale defense procurements, but significant for the specific services provided.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities, if CSA Global LLC chose to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals mandated in the contract, the direct benefit to the small business ecosystem is uncertain and depends on the prime contractor's procurement practices.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. Accountability measures are inherent in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which record award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, acquisition-support, program-management, engineering-services, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, cost-plus-fixed-fee, virginia, csa-global-llc, defense-contract-management-agency

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.4 million to CSA GLOBAL LLC. PMW 770 ACQUISITION/PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSA GLOBAL LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-10-01. End: 2017-02-13.

What specific program management functions did CSA Global LLC provide under this contract?

The contract, identified as PMW 770 Acquisition/Program Management Support, was awarded to CSA Global LLC for approximately $19.4 million. While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, contracts of this nature typically encompass a range of program management activities. These can include strategic planning, budget development and tracking, risk management, schedule management, coordination with stakeholders, acquisition strategy development, and ensuring compliance with federal acquisition regulations. The 'Engineering Services' NAICS code (541330) suggests a strong technical component to the program management, possibly involving oversight of engineering development, testing, or integration efforts for defense systems.

How does the $19.4 million award compare to similar program management support contracts within the DoD?

Comparing the $19.4 million award requires context regarding the contract's duration and scope. This contract spanned 1962 days (over 5 years), averaging roughly $4 million annually. Within the DoD, program management support contracts can range from a few million dollars for smaller, specialized tasks to hundreds of millions or even billions for large-scale, long-term programs. For a contract focused on acquisition/program management support, particularly with an engineering services component, this value appears moderate. However, a true benchmark would necessitate comparing it against contracts with similar service requirements, complexity, and duration awarded to similarly qualified contractors within the defense sector.

What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this service?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts, like the one awarded to CSA Global LLC, have inherent risks. The primary risk is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts, as their profit is fixed regardless of the final cost incurred. While the government pays the actual allowable costs, the fixed fee is predetermined. This structure can potentially lead to cost overruns if the government's oversight is not robust. To mitigate this, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) would need to diligently monitor expenditures, ensure costs are reasonable and allocable, and verify that the contractor is performing efficiently to achieve the program objectives within the anticipated cost framework.

What does the level of competition (5 bidders) indicate about the market for these services?

The presence of 5 bidders for this delivery order under a full and open competition suggests a moderately competitive market for acquisition and program management support services within the defense sector. Having multiple bidders generally indicates that there are several firms capable of performing the required work and willing to compete for the contract. This level of competition can be beneficial for the government, potentially leading to better pricing and service offerings. However, the true competitiveness also depends on the total number of qualified firms available in the market; if there are dozens of highly capable firms, 5 bidders might represent less intense competition than if there were only a handful of qualified entities.

What is the historical spending pattern for PMW 770 acquisition/program management support?

The provided data pertains to a single contract award for PMW 770 Acquisition/Program Management Support to CSA Global LLC, valued at $19.4 million and spanning from October 1, 2011, to February 13, 2017. This data point alone does not provide a comprehensive historical spending pattern. To establish such a pattern, one would need to analyze all contracts awarded under the PMW 770 designation, or similar program management support categories within the relevant Navy program executive office (if PMW refers to a specific Navy program), over an extended period. This would involve examining trends in award values, contract types, incumbent contractors, and competition levels to understand the evolution of spending and support needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002411R3229

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5701 CLEVELAND ST STE 140, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23462

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,631,534

Exercised Options: $19,631,534

Current Obligation: $19,431,759

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $2,536,323

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017805D4242

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-10-01

Current End Date: 2017-02-13

Potential End Date: 2017-02-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-11-03

More Contracts from CSA Global LLC

View all CSA Global LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending